Do loneliness and social exclusion breed paranoia? An experience sampling investigation across the psychosis continuum

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2023.100282
Victoria Bell , Eva Velthorst , Jorge Almansa , Inez Myin-Germeys , Sukhi Shergill , Anne-Kathrin Fett
{"title":"Do loneliness and social exclusion breed paranoia? An experience sampling investigation across the psychosis continuum","authors":"Victoria Bell ,&nbsp;Eva Velthorst ,&nbsp;Jorge Almansa ,&nbsp;Inez Myin-Germeys ,&nbsp;Sukhi Shergill ,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Fett","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2023.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of loneliness and social exclusion in the development of paranoia is largely unexplored. Negative affect may mediate potential associations between these factors. We investigated the temporal relationships of daily-life loneliness, felt social exclusion, negative affect, and paranoia across the psychosis continuum.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Seventy-five participants, including 29 individuals with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis, 20 first-degree relatives, and 26 controls used an Experience Sampling Method (ESM) app to capture the fluctuations in loneliness, feelings of social exclusion, paranoia, and negative affect across a 1-week period. Data were analysed with multilevel regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all groups, loneliness and feelings of social exclusion were independent predictors of paranoia over time (b = 0.05, <em>p</em> &lt; .001 and b = 0.04, <em>p</em> &lt; .05, respectively). Negative affect predicted paranoia (b = 0.17, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and partially mediated the associations between loneliness, social exclusion, and paranoia. It also predicted loneliness (b = 0.15, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001), but not social exclusion (b = 0.04, <em>p</em> = .21) over time. Paranoia predicted social exclusion over time, with more pronounced effects in controls (b = 0.43) than patients (b = 0.19; relatives: b = 0.17); but not loneliness (b = 0.08, <em>p</em> = .16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Paranoia and negative affect worsen in all groups following feelings of loneliness and social exclusion. This highlights the importance of a sense of belonging and being included for mental well-being. Loneliness, feeling socially excluded, and negative affect were independent predictors of paranoid thinking, suggesting they represent useful targets in its treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064439/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001323000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

The role of loneliness and social exclusion in the development of paranoia is largely unexplored. Negative affect may mediate potential associations between these factors. We investigated the temporal relationships of daily-life loneliness, felt social exclusion, negative affect, and paranoia across the psychosis continuum.

Method

Seventy-five participants, including 29 individuals with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis, 20 first-degree relatives, and 26 controls used an Experience Sampling Method (ESM) app to capture the fluctuations in loneliness, feelings of social exclusion, paranoia, and negative affect across a 1-week period. Data were analysed with multilevel regression analyses.

Results

In all groups, loneliness and feelings of social exclusion were independent predictors of paranoia over time (b = 0.05, p < .001 and b = 0.04, p < .05, respectively). Negative affect predicted paranoia (b = 0.17, p < .001) and partially mediated the associations between loneliness, social exclusion, and paranoia. It also predicted loneliness (b = 0.15, p < .0001), but not social exclusion (b = 0.04, p = .21) over time. Paranoia predicted social exclusion over time, with more pronounced effects in controls (b = 0.43) than patients (b = 0.19; relatives: b = 0.17); but not loneliness (b = 0.08, p = .16).

Conclusion

Paranoia and negative affect worsen in all groups following feelings of loneliness and social exclusion. This highlights the importance of a sense of belonging and being included for mental well-being. Loneliness, feeling socially excluded, and negative affect were independent predictors of paranoid thinking, suggesting they represent useful targets in its treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤独和社会排斥会滋生偏执狂吗?精神病连续体的经验抽样调查
背景孤独和社会排斥在多疑症发展中的作用在很大程度上尚未被探索。负面影响可能介导这些因素之间的潜在关联。我们调查了精神病连续体中日常生活孤独感、社会排斥感、负面影响和偏执狂的时间关系。方法75名参与者,包括29名被诊断为非情感性精神病的患者、20名一级亲属和26名对照者,使用经验抽样方法(ESM)应用程序来捕捉1周内孤独感、社会排斥感、偏执狂和负面影响的波动。数据采用多水平回归分析。结果在所有组中,随着时间的推移,孤独感和社会排斥感是偏执狂的独立预测因素(分别为b=0.05,p<;.001和b=0.04,p<;.05)。负面影响预测了妄想症(b=0.17,p<;.001),并部分介导了孤独、社会排斥和妄想症之间的关联。它还预测了孤独感(b=0.15,p<;.0001),但没有预测社会排斥(b=0.04,p=.21)。随着时间的推移,偏执狂预测了社会排斥,对照组(b=0.43)的影响比患者(b=0.19;亲属:b=0.17)更明显;而不是孤独(b=0.08,p=.16)。结论在孤独感和社会排斥感之后,所有组的偏执和负面情绪都会恶化。这突出了归属感和被包容对心理健康的重要性。孤独感、被社会排斥感和负面影响是偏执思维的独立预测因素,这表明它们是治疗偏执思维的有用靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Cognitive functioning and functional ability in women with schizophrenia and homelessness Humor processing and its relationship with clinical features in patients with first-episode schizophrenia Through the lens of schizophrenia: Recognizing negative facial expressions and family patterns Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review Advances in the ecological validity of research on social cognition in schizophrenia: A systematic review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1