The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.

IF 3.5 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1177/09636625231176935
Sinan Alper, Busra Elif Yelbuz, Sumeyra Bengisu Akkurt, Onurcan Yilmaz
{"title":"The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.","authors":"Sinan Alper, Busra Elif Yelbuz, Sumeyra Bengisu Akkurt, Onurcan Yilmaz","doi":"10.1177/09636625231176935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most prominent correlates of trust in science and scientists is education level, possibly because educated individuals have higher levels of science knowledge and thinking ability, suggesting that trusting science and scientists relies more on reflective thinking abilities. However, it is relatively more reasonable for highly educated individuals to suspect authority figures in highly corrupt countries. We tested this prediction in two nationally representative and probabilistic cross-cultural data sets (Study 1: 142 countries, <i>N</i> = 40,085; Study 2: 47 countries, <i>N</i> = 69,332), and found that the positive association between education and trust in scientists (Study 1) and science (Study 2) was weaker or non-existent in highly corrupt countries. The results did not change after statistically controlling for age, sex, household income, and residence. We suggest future research to be more considerate of the societal context in understanding how education status correlates with trust in science and scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231176935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most prominent correlates of trust in science and scientists is education level, possibly because educated individuals have higher levels of science knowledge and thinking ability, suggesting that trusting science and scientists relies more on reflective thinking abilities. However, it is relatively more reasonable for highly educated individuals to suspect authority figures in highly corrupt countries. We tested this prediction in two nationally representative and probabilistic cross-cultural data sets (Study 1: 142 countries, N = 40,085; Study 2: 47 countries, N = 69,332), and found that the positive association between education and trust in scientists (Study 1) and science (Study 2) was weaker or non-existent in highly corrupt countries. The results did not change after statistically controlling for age, sex, household income, and residence. We suggest future research to be more considerate of the societal context in understanding how education status correlates with trust in science and scientists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在腐败严重的国家,教育与对科学和科学家的信任之间的正相关关系较弱。
教育水平是信任科学和科学家的最显著相关因素之一,这可能是因为受过教育的人拥有更高水平的科学知识和思维能力,表明信任科学和科学家更依赖于反思能力。然而,在腐败严重的国家,受过高等教育的人怀疑权威人士相对更合理。我们在两个具有国家代表性的概率跨文化数据集(研究 1:142 个国家,N=40,085;研究 2:47 个国家,N=69,332)中检验了这一预测,发现在高度腐败的国家,教育与对科学家(研究 1)和科学(研究 2)的信任之间的正相关关系较弱或不存在。在对年龄、性别、家庭收入和居住地进行统计控制后,结果没有变化。我们建议今后的研究在理解教育状况如何与科学和科学家信任度相关时,应更多地考虑社会背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
期刊最新文献
Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news. Towards a trusted genomics repository: Identifying commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance across segments of the community. Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs. Issue ownership of science in the United States. The four "R"s: Strategies for tailoring science for religious publics and their prices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1