Estimating the test-adjusted incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections identified through Public Health Ontario Laboratories in Peel region, Ontario, 2010-2018: a population-based study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210236
Lindsay Obress, Olaf Berke, David N Fisman, Shilpa Raju, Ashleigh R Tuite, Monali Varia, Amy L Greer
{"title":"Estimating the test-adjusted incidence of <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> infections identified through Public Health Ontario Laboratories in Peel region, Ontario, 2010-2018: a population-based study.","authors":"Lindsay Obress,&nbsp;Olaf Berke,&nbsp;David N Fisman,&nbsp;Shilpa Raju,&nbsp;Ashleigh R Tuite,&nbsp;Monali Varia,&nbsp;Amy L Greer","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health guidelines for chlamydia testing are not sex specific, but young females test at a disproportionally higher rate than males and other age groups. This study aims to describe testing trends across age and sex subgroups, then estimate a test-adjusted incidence of chlamydia in these subgroups to identify gaps in current testing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a population-based study to examine observed chlamydia rates by age and sex subgroups: 15-19 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years and older than 40 years. The study included diagnostic test results recorded by Public Health Ontario Laboratories between Jan. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2018, for individuals living in Peel region, Ontario. We then employed meta-regression models as a method of standardization to estimate the effect of sex and age on standardized morbidity ratio, testing ratio and test positivity, then calculate a test-adjusted incidence of chlamydia for each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, infection, testing and test positivity varied across age and sex subgroups. Observed incidence and testing were highest in females aged 20-29 years, whereas males had the highest standardized test positivity across all age groups. After estimating test-adjusted incidence for each age-sex subgroup, males in the 15-19-year and 30-39-year age groups had an increase in incidence of 60.2% and 9.7%, respectively, compared with the observed incidence.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We found that estimated test-adjusted incidence was higher than observed incidence in males aged 15-19 years and 30-39 years. This suggests that infections in males are likely being missed owing to differential testing, and this may be contributing to the persistent increase in reported cases in Canada. Public health programming that targets males, especially in high-risk settings and communities, and use of innovative partner notification methods could be critical to curbing overall rates of chlamydia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 1","pages":"E62-E69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/2b/cmajo.20210236.PMC9876583.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Public health guidelines for chlamydia testing are not sex specific, but young females test at a disproportionally higher rate than males and other age groups. This study aims to describe testing trends across age and sex subgroups, then estimate a test-adjusted incidence of chlamydia in these subgroups to identify gaps in current testing practices.

Methods: We used a population-based study to examine observed chlamydia rates by age and sex subgroups: 15-19 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years and older than 40 years. The study included diagnostic test results recorded by Public Health Ontario Laboratories between Jan. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2018, for individuals living in Peel region, Ontario. We then employed meta-regression models as a method of standardization to estimate the effect of sex and age on standardized morbidity ratio, testing ratio and test positivity, then calculate a test-adjusted incidence of chlamydia for each subgroup.

Results: Over the study period, infection, testing and test positivity varied across age and sex subgroups. Observed incidence and testing were highest in females aged 20-29 years, whereas males had the highest standardized test positivity across all age groups. After estimating test-adjusted incidence for each age-sex subgroup, males in the 15-19-year and 30-39-year age groups had an increase in incidence of 60.2% and 9.7%, respectively, compared with the observed incidence.

Interpretation: We found that estimated test-adjusted incidence was higher than observed incidence in males aged 15-19 years and 30-39 years. This suggests that infections in males are likely being missed owing to differential testing, and this may be contributing to the persistent increase in reported cases in Canada. Public health programming that targets males, especially in high-risk settings and communities, and use of innovative partner notification methods could be critical to curbing overall rates of chlamydia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计2010-2018年安大略省皮尔地区安大略省公共卫生实验室确定的沙眼衣原体感染的测试调整发生率:一项基于人群的研究
背景:衣原体检测的公共卫生指南没有性别特异性,但年轻女性的检测率不成比例地高于男性和其他年龄组。本研究旨在描述不同年龄和性别亚组的检测趋势,然后估计这些亚组中经检测调整的衣原体发病率,以确定当前检测实践中的差距。方法:我们采用一项基于人群的研究,按年龄和性别亚组(15-19岁、20-29岁、30-39岁和40岁以上)检查观察到的衣原体发病率。该研究包括安大略省公共卫生实验室在2010年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间对居住在安大略省皮尔地区的个人记录的诊断测试结果。然后,我们采用meta回归模型作为标准化方法来估计性别和年龄对标准化发病率、检测率和检测阳性的影响,然后计算每个亚组的经测试调整的衣原体发病率。结果:在研究期间,感染、检测和检测阳性在不同年龄和性别的亚组中存在差异。观察到的发病率和检测在20-29岁的女性中最高,而男性在所有年龄组中都有最高的标准化检测阳性。在估计每个年龄-性别亚组的测试调整发病率后,15-19岁和30-39岁年龄组的男性发病率分别比观察到的发病率增加了60.2%和9.7%。解释:我们发现在15-19岁和30-39岁的男性中,经测试调整的估计发病率高于观察到的发病率。这表明,由于差异检测,男性感染可能被遗漏,这可能是加拿大报告病例持续增加的原因。针对男性的公共卫生规划,特别是在高风险环境和社区,以及使用创新的伴侣通知方法,对于控制衣原体的总体发病率可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1