Remodeling of the aortic root-a 28-year journey.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of cardiothoracic surgery Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.21037/acs-2022-avs1-15
Karen B Abeln, Tristan Ehrlich, Lennart Froede, Christian Giebels, Hans-Joachim Schäfers
{"title":"Remodeling of the aortic root-a 28-year journey.","authors":"Karen B Abeln,&nbsp;Tristan Ehrlich,&nbsp;Lennart Froede,&nbsp;Christian Giebels,&nbsp;Hans-Joachim Schäfers","doi":"10.21037/acs-2022-avs1-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm. The objective of this review was to summarize our experience with root remodeling encompassing 28 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed root remodeling in 1,189 patients (76% male, mean age 53±14 years) between October 1995 and September 2022. The original valve morphology was unicuspid in 33 (2%), bicuspid in 472 (40%) and tricuspid in 684 (58%) patients. Fifty-four patients (5%) had Marfan's syndrome. Objective measurement of valve configuration was performed in 804 (77%) and an external suture annuloplasty was added in 524 patients (44%). Cusp repair was performed in 1,047 (88%) patients, most commonly for prolapse (n=972; 82%). Mean follow-up was 6.7±5.5 years [1 month to 28 years]. Follow-up was 95% complete (7,700 patient-years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival was 71% at 20 years; freedom from cardiac death was 80%. Freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥2 was 77% at 15 years. Freedom from reoperation was 89% and was higher in tricuspid aortic valves (94%) compared to bicuspid (84%) and unicuspid valves (P<0.001). Since the introduction of effective height measurement, freedom from reoperation has remained stable at 15 years (91%). With the addition of a suture annuloplasty, freedom from reoperation was 94% at 12 years. The difference with or without annuloplasty (91%) was not significant (P=0.949).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. Concomitant cusp prolapse is frequent and can be corrected reproducibly by intraoperative measurement of effective height. The long-term benefit of an annuloplasty still needs to be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"225-236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/0c/acs-12-03-225.PMC10248910.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2022-avs1-15","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm. The objective of this review was to summarize our experience with root remodeling encompassing 28 years.

Methods: We performed root remodeling in 1,189 patients (76% male, mean age 53±14 years) between October 1995 and September 2022. The original valve morphology was unicuspid in 33 (2%), bicuspid in 472 (40%) and tricuspid in 684 (58%) patients. Fifty-four patients (5%) had Marfan's syndrome. Objective measurement of valve configuration was performed in 804 (77%) and an external suture annuloplasty was added in 524 patients (44%). Cusp repair was performed in 1,047 (88%) patients, most commonly for prolapse (n=972; 82%). Mean follow-up was 6.7±5.5 years [1 month to 28 years]. Follow-up was 95% complete (7,700 patient-years).

Results: Survival was 71% at 20 years; freedom from cardiac death was 80%. Freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥2 was 77% at 15 years. Freedom from reoperation was 89% and was higher in tricuspid aortic valves (94%) compared to bicuspid (84%) and unicuspid valves (P<0.001). Since the introduction of effective height measurement, freedom from reoperation has remained stable at 15 years (91%). With the addition of a suture annuloplasty, freedom from reoperation was 94% at 12 years. The difference with or without annuloplasty (91%) was not significant (P=0.949).

Conclusions: Root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. Concomitant cusp prolapse is frequent and can be corrected reproducibly by intraoperative measurement of effective height. The long-term benefit of an annuloplasty still needs to be defined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉根部重塑——28年的历程。
背景:根重塑是主动脉反流和根动脉瘤的一种保留瓣膜的根置换术。这篇综述的目的是总结我们近28年来牙根重塑的经验。方法:我们在1995年10月至2022年9月期间对1189例患者进行了牙根重塑,其中76%为男性,平均年龄53±14岁。原始瓣膜形态为单尖瓣33例(2%),双尖瓣472例(40%),三尖瓣684例(58%)。54例(5%)患者有马凡氏综合征。804例(77%)患者进行了瓣膜构型的客观测量,524例(44%)患者增加了外部缝合环成形术。1047例(88%)患者进行了尖端修复,最常见的是脱垂(n=972;82%)。平均随访6.7±5.5年(1个月~ 28年)。随访完成95%(7700患者年)。结果:20年生存率为71%;心源性死亡发生率为80%。15年时主动脉反流≥2的自由度为77%。与二尖瓣(84%)和单尖瓣相比,三尖瓣主动脉瓣的再手术自由度为89%(94%)更高。结论:在保留瓣膜的主动脉瓣置换术中,根重塑是一种可行的选择。并发的鼻尖脱垂是常见的,可以通过术中测量有效高度来纠正。环成形术的长期效益仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Different styles in trocar placement in robotic-assisted beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting. Embracing industry in the development of robotic coronary bypass grafting-the sun rises in the East. Exposure technique for the circumflex artery territory in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. How to advance from minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting to totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting: challenges in Europe versus United States of America. How to robotically take down a mammary artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1