Knowledge of First Aid Treatment of Burns: A Comparative Study of Parents and Non-parent Adults.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Hamna Atique, Hafsa Atique, Sheena Shamoon, Hurmat Fatima Azeem, Syeda Rija Hussain
{"title":"Knowledge of First Aid Treatment of Burns: A Comparative Study of Parents and Non-parent Adults.","authors":"Hamna Atique,&nbsp;Hafsa Atique,&nbsp;Sheena Shamoon,&nbsp;Hurmat Fatima Azeem,&nbsp;Syeda Rija Hussain","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn first aid treatment is any primary care provided for burn injuries prior to medical aid. Children are most vulnerable, with 17% to 18% of childhood burn injuries in Pakistan resulting in disability due to inadequate first aid. Misconceptions and incorrect instant home remedies like toothpastes and burn creams encumber the health care system with preventable ailments. This study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge scores of parents of children under the age of 13 years and non-parent adults regarding burn first aid treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted on parents of children under the age of 13 years and non-parent adults. This study included 364 respondents via an online questionnaire; those under the age of 18 years and with previous workshop attendance were excluded. Results were computed in terms of frequencies and comparisons using chi-square test and student <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, knowledge among both groups remained inadequate (mean score of 4.18 ± 1.94 out of 14 with parents = 4.20 ± 1.91 and non-parent adults = 4.17 ± 1.98) with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 0.841). From a total of 364 respondents, 148 (40.7%) confessed to using toothpaste as the best first aid, while cooling the burn was the most favored immediate step (27.5%). Running with the face covered by a wet towel was considered the safest way of escaping a burning building by 33.8% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both groups were poorly aware of burn first aid treatment, with no superiority of parents over non-parent adults. This highlights the need for educating adults, especially parents, to cater to the prevalent misconceptions in our society and help deliver authentic knowledge regarding first aid management of burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257203/pdf/eplasty-23-e31.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burn first aid treatment is any primary care provided for burn injuries prior to medical aid. Children are most vulnerable, with 17% to 18% of childhood burn injuries in Pakistan resulting in disability due to inadequate first aid. Misconceptions and incorrect instant home remedies like toothpastes and burn creams encumber the health care system with preventable ailments. This study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge scores of parents of children under the age of 13 years and non-parent adults regarding burn first aid treatment.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted on parents of children under the age of 13 years and non-parent adults. This study included 364 respondents via an online questionnaire; those under the age of 18 years and with previous workshop attendance were excluded. Results were computed in terms of frequencies and comparisons using chi-square test and student t test.

Results: Overall, knowledge among both groups remained inadequate (mean score of 4.18 ± 1.94 out of 14 with parents = 4.20 ± 1.91 and non-parent adults = 4.17 ± 1.98) with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.841). From a total of 364 respondents, 148 (40.7%) confessed to using toothpaste as the best first aid, while cooling the burn was the most favored immediate step (27.5%). Running with the face covered by a wet towel was considered the safest way of escaping a burning building by 33.8% of respondents.

Conclusions: Both groups were poorly aware of burn first aid treatment, with no superiority of parents over non-parent adults. This highlights the need for educating adults, especially parents, to cater to the prevalent misconceptions in our society and help deliver authentic knowledge regarding first aid management of burns.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤急救知识:父母与非父母成人的比较研究。
背景:烧伤急救治疗是在医疗救助之前为烧伤提供的任何初级护理。儿童是最脆弱的,巴基斯坦17%至18%的儿童烧伤因急救不足而导致残疾。误解和不正确的家庭即时疗法,如牙膏和烧伤膏,阻碍了医疗保健系统的可预防疾病。本研究旨在评估和比较13岁以下儿童父母与非父母成人烧伤急救知识得分。方法:采用横断面描述性调查方法,对13岁以下儿童的父母和无父母的成年人进行调查。该研究通过在线问卷调查了364名受访者;年龄在18岁以下和以前参加过讲习班的人被排除在外。使用卡方检验和学生t检验以频率和比较来计算结果。结果:总体而言,两组患者的知识水平均存在不足(14名父母组= 4.20±1.91,非父母组= 4.17±1.98,平均得分为4.18±1.94),两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.841)。在364名受访者中,148人(40.7%)承认使用牙膏是最好的急救措施,而冷却烧伤是最受欢迎的直接措施(27.5%)。33.8%的受访者认为,用湿毛巾蒙住脸跑是逃离燃烧的建筑物最安全的方式。结论:两组患者烧伤急救意识均较差,且父母对非父母成人烧伤急救意识不存在优势。这突出了教育成年人,特别是父母的必要性,以迎合我们社会中普遍存在的误解,并帮助提供有关烧伤急救管理的真实知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1