A Critical Systematic Review for Inhaled Corticosteroids on Lung Cancer Incidence: Not Yet Concluded Story.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4046/trd.2022.0084
Suh-Young Lee, Soon Ho Yoon, Hyunsook Hong
{"title":"A Critical Systematic Review for Inhaled Corticosteroids on Lung Cancer Incidence: Not Yet Concluded Story.","authors":"Suh-Young Lee,&nbsp;Soon Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Hyunsook Hong","doi":"10.4046/trd.2022.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To systematically review studies on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and lung cancer incidence in chronic airway disease patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted electronic bibliographic searches on OVID-MEDLINE, EM- BASE, and the Cochrane Database before May 2020 to identify relevant studies. Detailed data on the study population, exposure, and outcome domains were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,058 screened publications, 13 eligible studies in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma evaluated lung cancer incidence after ICS exposure. Pooled hazard ratio and odds ratio for developing lung cancer in ICS exposure were 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.02; I2=95.7%) from 10 studies and 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 2.07; I2=94.7%) from three studies. Meta-regression failed to explain the substantial heterogeneity of pooled estimates. COPD and asthma were variously defined without spirometry in 11 studies. Regarding exposure assessment, three and 10 studies regarded ICS exposure as a time-dependent and fixed variable, respectively. Some studies assessed ICS use for the entire study period, whereas others assessed ICS use for 6 months to 2 years within or before study entry. Smoking was adjusted in four studies, and only four studies introduced 1 to 2 latency years in their main or subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies published to date on ICS and lung cancer incidence had heterogeneous study populations, exposures, and outcome assessments, limiting the generation of a pooled conclusion. The beneficial effect of ICS on lung cancer incidence has not yet been established, and understanding the heterogeneities will help future researchers to establish robust evidence on ICS and lung cancer incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":"86 2","pages":"120-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/5a/trd-2022-0084.PMC10073604.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2022.0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To systematically review studies on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and lung cancer incidence in chronic airway disease patients.

Methods: We conducted electronic bibliographic searches on OVID-MEDLINE, EM- BASE, and the Cochrane Database before May 2020 to identify relevant studies. Detailed data on the study population, exposure, and outcome domains were reviewed.

Results: Of 4,058 screened publications, 13 eligible studies in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma evaluated lung cancer incidence after ICS exposure. Pooled hazard ratio and odds ratio for developing lung cancer in ICS exposure were 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.02; I2=95.7%) from 10 studies and 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 2.07; I2=94.7%) from three studies. Meta-regression failed to explain the substantial heterogeneity of pooled estimates. COPD and asthma were variously defined without spirometry in 11 studies. Regarding exposure assessment, three and 10 studies regarded ICS exposure as a time-dependent and fixed variable, respectively. Some studies assessed ICS use for the entire study period, whereas others assessed ICS use for 6 months to 2 years within or before study entry. Smoking was adjusted in four studies, and only four studies introduced 1 to 2 latency years in their main or subgroup analysis.

Conclusion: Studies published to date on ICS and lung cancer incidence had heterogeneous study populations, exposures, and outcome assessments, limiting the generation of a pooled conclusion. The beneficial effect of ICS on lung cancer incidence has not yet been established, and understanding the heterogeneities will help future researchers to establish robust evidence on ICS and lung cancer incidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入皮质类固醇对肺癌发病率的重要系统评价:尚未得出结论。
背景:系统回顾慢性气道疾病患者吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)与肺癌发病率的相关研究。方法:我们在2020年5月之前对OVID-MEDLINE、EM- BASE和Cochrane数据库进行电子书目检索,以确定相关研究。对研究人群、暴露和结果领域的详细数据进行了回顾。结果:在4058份被筛选的出版物中,13项针对成人慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘患者的合格研究评估了ICS暴露后的肺癌发病率。暴露于ICS后发生肺癌的合并风险比和优势比为0.81(95%可信区间为0.64 ~ 1.02;I2=95.7%)和1.02(95%可信区间0.50 ~ 2.07;I2=94.7%)。元回归未能解释汇总估计值的实质性异质性。在11项研究中,COPD和哮喘在没有肺量测定的情况下定义不同。在暴露评估方面,分别有3项和10项研究将ICS暴露视为时间相关变量和固定变量。一些研究评估了整个研究期间的ICS使用情况,而另一些研究评估了在研究开始期间或之前6个月至2年的ICS使用情况。4项研究对吸烟进行了调整,只有4项研究在其主组或亚组分析中引入了1至2个潜伏期年。结论:迄今为止发表的关于ICS和肺癌发病率的研究具有异质性的研究人群、暴露和结果评估,限制了汇总结论的产生。ICS对肺癌发病率的有益作用尚未确定,了解其异质性将有助于未来研究人员建立ICS与肺癌发病率的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of Lung Cysts in Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome from Patients with Multiple Lung Cysts. Request for Study Design Modification in Examining Nutritional Intake and Muscle Strength in Individuals with Airflow Limitation. Air Pollution and Interstitial Lung Disease. Dry Medical Thoracoscopy with Artificial Pneumothorax Induction Using Veress Needle. Clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to smoking status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1