The impact of rapid diagnostic testing on hospital administrative coding accuracy for influenza

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Infection Disease & Health Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.idh.2023.05.003
Hugh C. Murray , Benjamin J. Smith , Mark Putland , Lou Irving , Douglas Johnson , Deborah A. Williamson , Steven Y.C. Tong
{"title":"The impact of rapid diagnostic testing on hospital administrative coding accuracy for influenza","authors":"Hugh C. Murray ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Smith ,&nbsp;Mark Putland ,&nbsp;Lou Irving ,&nbsp;Douglas Johnson ,&nbsp;Deborah A. Williamson ,&nbsp;Steven Y.C. Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hospital administrative coding may underestimate the true incidence of influenza-associated hospitalisation. Earlier availability of test results could lead to improved accuracy of administrative coding.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>In this study we evaluated International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) coding for influenza (with [J09-J10] or without [J11] </span>virus identified) in adult inpatients who underwent testing in the year prior, compared to those in the 2.5 years after, the introduction of rapid PCR testing in 2017. Other factors associated with influenza coding were evaluated using </span>logistic regression. Discharge summaries were audited to assess the impact of documentation and result availability on coding accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Influenza was confirmed by laboratory testing in 862 of 5755 (15%) patients tested after rapid PCR introduction compared with 170 of 926 (18%) prior. Following the introduction of rapid testing there was a significant increase in patients allocated J09 or J10 ICD-10 codes (768 of 860 [89%] </span>vs 107 of 140 [79%], P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with correct coding were rapid PCR testing (aOR 4.36 95% CI [2.75–6.90]) and increasing length of stay (aOR 1.01, 95% CI [1.00–1.01]). Correctly coded patients were more likely to have documentation of influenza in their discharge summaries (95 of 101 [89%] vs 11 of 101 [10%], P &lt; 0.001) and less likely to have pending results at discharge (8 of 101 [8%] vs 65 of 101 [61%], P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The introduction of rapid PCR testing for influenza was associated with more accurate hospital coding. One possible explanation is faster test turnaround leading to improvement in clinical documentation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hospital administrative coding may underestimate the true incidence of influenza-associated hospitalisation. Earlier availability of test results could lead to improved accuracy of administrative coding.

Methods

In this study we evaluated International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) coding for influenza (with [J09-J10] or without [J11] virus identified) in adult inpatients who underwent testing in the year prior, compared to those in the 2.5 years after, the introduction of rapid PCR testing in 2017. Other factors associated with influenza coding were evaluated using logistic regression. Discharge summaries were audited to assess the impact of documentation and result availability on coding accuracy.

Results

Influenza was confirmed by laboratory testing in 862 of 5755 (15%) patients tested after rapid PCR introduction compared with 170 of 926 (18%) prior. Following the introduction of rapid testing there was a significant increase in patients allocated J09 or J10 ICD-10 codes (768 of 860 [89%] vs 107 of 140 [79%], P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with correct coding were rapid PCR testing (aOR 4.36 95% CI [2.75–6.90]) and increasing length of stay (aOR 1.01, 95% CI [1.00–1.01]). Correctly coded patients were more likely to have documentation of influenza in their discharge summaries (95 of 101 [89%] vs 11 of 101 [10%], P < 0.001) and less likely to have pending results at discharge (8 of 101 [8%] vs 65 of 101 [61%], P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The introduction of rapid PCR testing for influenza was associated with more accurate hospital coding. One possible explanation is faster test turnaround leading to improvement in clinical documentation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速诊断检测对流感医院管理编码准确性的影响。
背景:医院行政编码可能低估了流感相关住院的真实发生率。尽早获得测试结果可以提高管理编码的准确性。方法:在本研究中,我们评估了在前一年接受检测的成年住院患者中编码流感(已识别[J09-J10]或未识别[J11]病毒)的国际疾病分类10(ICD-10),与2017年引入快速PCR检测后2.5年的住院患者进行了比较。其他与流感编码相关的因素使用逻辑回归进行评估。对出院总结进行了审计,以评估文件和结果可用性对编码准确性的影响。结果:在5755名患者中,862名(15%)在快速PCR引入后接受检测,而926名患者中有170名(18%)在实验室检测中确诊为流感。在引入快速检测后,分配J09或J10 ICD-10代码的患者显著增加(768/860[89%]vs 107/140[79%],P=0.001)。在多变量分析中,与正确编码独立相关的因素是快速PCR检测(aOR 4.36 95%CI[2.75-6.90])和住院时间增加(aOR 1.01,95%CI[1.00-1.01])。正确编码的患者更有可能在出院总结中记录流感(101例中有95例[89%],而101例中只有11例[10%]结论:流感快速PCR检测的引入与更准确的医院编码有关。一种可能的解释是更快的测试周转,从而改善临床文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Disease & Health
Infection Disease & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Australia's COVID-19 quarantine cohort journeys Reducing candidaemia risk in urology patients: Revised algorithm & Pharmacist-Led Implementation Designing for transparency and trust: Next steps for healthcare associated infection surveillance in Queensland The experience of infection prevention and control nurse (IPCN) in conducting post-discharge surveillance (PDS) of surgical site infections (SSI): A qualitative study From basic research to clinical practice: The impact of laminar airflow filters on surgical site infection in vascular surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1