The role of honour in interpersonal, intrapersonal and intergroup processes.

IF 4.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1111/spc3.12719
Ayse K Uskul, Susan E Cross, Ceren Günsoy
{"title":"The role of honour in interpersonal, intrapersonal and intergroup processes.","authors":"Ayse K Uskul,&nbsp;Susan E Cross,&nbsp;Ceren Günsoy","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we review research in psychology and other related social science fields that has adopted an honor framework to examine intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intergroup processes taking a culture-comparative or individual differences approach. In the sections below, we will first review research on the role of honor in interpersonal processes focusing primarily on interpersonal aggression including in close relationships, non-aggressive ways of responding to threats (e.g., forgiveness), and reciprocity. Next, we move onto reviewing research on the role of honor in intrapersonal processes, specifically in the domains of emotional responses to honor-threatening situations, mental, and physical health. Finally, we review research emerging from social and political psychology and political science that have utilized the honor framework to understand and explain group processes and intergroup relations at different level of analyses (e.g., social groups, nations). Given the limited space, our goal was to emphasize major and emerging areas of research on honor and provide food for thought for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":"17 1","pages":"e12719"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078545/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this article, we review research in psychology and other related social science fields that has adopted an honor framework to examine intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intergroup processes taking a culture-comparative or individual differences approach. In the sections below, we will first review research on the role of honor in interpersonal processes focusing primarily on interpersonal aggression including in close relationships, non-aggressive ways of responding to threats (e.g., forgiveness), and reciprocity. Next, we move onto reviewing research on the role of honor in intrapersonal processes, specifically in the domains of emotional responses to honor-threatening situations, mental, and physical health. Finally, we review research emerging from social and political psychology and political science that have utilized the honor framework to understand and explain group processes and intergroup relations at different level of analyses (e.g., social groups, nations). Given the limited space, our goal was to emphasize major and emerging areas of research on honor and provide food for thought for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荣誉在人际关系、人际关系和群体间的过程中的作用。
在这篇文章中,我们回顾了心理学和其他相关社会科学领域的研究,这些研究采用了荣誉框架,以文化比较或个体差异的方法来研究个人内部、人际关系和群体间的过程。在下面的章节中,我们将首先回顾关于荣誉在人际关系过程中的作用的研究,主要关注人际攻击,包括亲密关系,应对威胁的非攻击性方式(例如,宽恕)和互惠。接下来,我们将回顾有关荣誉在人际交往过程中的作用的研究,特别是在荣誉威胁情境、心理和身体健康的情绪反应领域。最后,我们回顾了来自社会政治心理学和政治学的研究,这些研究利用荣誉框架来理解和解释群体过程和群体间关系的不同分析层面(例如,社会群体、国家)。由于篇幅有限,我们的目标是强调荣誉研究的主要和新兴领域,并为未来的研究提供思想食粮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing psychological well-being as a dynamic process: Implications for research on mobile health interventions Studying personality and social structure Responding to feedback about implicit bias Tracking depressive and anxious symptoms during the first year of COVID-19: The search for moderators COVID‐19 responsibility and blame: How group identity and political ideology inform perceptions of responsibility, blame, and racial disparities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1