Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations with Four Different Framework Designs.

Q3 Dentistry Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v20i2.12197
Sara Tavakolizadeh, Najmeh Yazdani, Rahab Ghoveizi, Abolghasem Mohammadi, Elaheh Beyabanaki, Soudabeh Koulivand
{"title":"Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations with Four Different Framework Designs.","authors":"Sara Tavakolizadeh,&nbsp;Najmeh Yazdani,&nbsp;Rahab Ghoveizi,&nbsp;Abolghasem Mohammadi,&nbsp;Elaheh Beyabanaki,&nbsp;Soudabeh Koulivand","doi":"10.18502/fid.v20i2.12197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study assessed the fracture resistance of zirconia crowns with four framework designs, fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this experimental study, a maxillary central incisor was prepared and scanned with a CAD/CAM scanner, and 40 frameworks with 4 designs (N=10) were fabricated as follows: simple core, dentine core with a design similar to dentine, 3mm trestle design collar in the lingual aspect with proximal buttresses, and monolithic or full-contour. After porcelain applying and 20h immersion in distilled water (37°C), crowns were cemented on metal dies using zinc phosphate cement. Fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Fracture resistance was maximum in the monolithic group, followed by the dentine core, trestle design, and simple core groups, respectively. The mean fracture resistance of the monolithic group was significantly higher than that of the simple core group (P<0.005). <b>Conclusion:</b> Zirconia restorations with frameworks that provided higher and more support for porcelain, showed increased fracture resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"20 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/6e/FID-20-2.PMC10258404.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i2.12197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the fracture resistance of zirconia crowns with four framework designs, fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, a maxillary central incisor was prepared and scanned with a CAD/CAM scanner, and 40 frameworks with 4 designs (N=10) were fabricated as follows: simple core, dentine core with a design similar to dentine, 3mm trestle design collar in the lingual aspect with proximal buttresses, and monolithic or full-contour. After porcelain applying and 20h immersion in distilled water (37°C), crowns were cemented on metal dies using zinc phosphate cement. Fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05). Results: Fracture resistance was maximum in the monolithic group, followed by the dentine core, trestle design, and simple core groups, respectively. The mean fracture resistance of the monolithic group was significantly higher than that of the simple core group (P<0.005). Conclusion: Zirconia restorations with frameworks that provided higher and more support for porcelain, showed increased fracture resistance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种不同框架设计的氧化锆修复体的抗断裂性。
目的:研究采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术制作的四种框架设计的氧化锆冠的抗断裂性能。材料与方法:在本实验研究中,制备上颌中切牙并使用CAD/CAM扫描仪进行扫描,并制作了4种设计(N=10)的40个框架,分别是:简单核、与牙本质设计相似的牙本质核、舌侧3mm支架设计带近端支托的环、整体或全轮廓。烤瓷后,在蒸馏水(37℃)中浸泡20小时,使用磷酸锌水泥将冠粘接在金属模具上。采用万能试验机进行断裂抗力测试。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(α =0.05)。结果:整体式组抗骨折能力最强,牙本质核组次之,支架设计组次之,简单核组次之。整体组的平均抗折断性明显高于单纯核组(p结论:框架对瓷提供更高、更多的支撑,氧化锆修复体的抗折断性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anxiolytic Effect of Jasmine Aromatherapy in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Single-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Smoking Cessation Counseling: Practices, Determinants, and Barriers in a Sample of Iranian Primary Care Dentists. Fracture Resistance, Surface Roughness, and Microtensile Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Resin Cements after Plasma Treatment. The Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin. In Vitro Effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol Polishing Systems on Composite Resin Surface Roughness after Aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1