Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale
{"title":"Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale","authors":"Mélanie Verdon, Anne-Claire Rae, Corinne Palleron, Marie-José Roulin","doi":"10.3917/rsi.149.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers. Structured evaluation with a risk assessment tool is recommended in order to identify patients at risk. The Braden QD Scale integrates the risks of both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure ulcers in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate and pretest the Braden QD Scale into French (Swiss-French version), and to evaluate its consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Over five prevalence surveys, the Braden QD Scale was used on all hospitalized pediatric patients. Convergent validity and internal consistency were tested. A self-administered questionnaire on feasibility and clinical utility was completed by nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated version of the Braden QD Scale was pretested on 352 children. The prevalence surveys showed that 5.1% were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Medical devices were present in 85.8% of cases. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.710 and a high convergent validity were measured. High scores of feasibility and clinical utility were found.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the Swiss-French version of the Braden QD Scale is reliable, valid, feasible, and has clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.149.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers. Structured evaluation with a risk assessment tool is recommended in order to identify patients at risk. The Braden QD Scale integrates the risks of both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure ulcers in pediatric patients.
Objectives: To translate and pretest the Braden QD Scale into French (Swiss-French version), and to evaluate its consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility.
Method: Over five prevalence surveys, the Braden QD Scale was used on all hospitalized pediatric patients. Convergent validity and internal consistency were tested. A self-administered questionnaire on feasibility and clinical utility was completed by nurses.
Results: The translated version of the Braden QD Scale was pretested on 352 children. The prevalence surveys showed that 5.1% were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Medical devices were present in 85.8% of cases. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.710 and a high convergent validity were measured. High scores of feasibility and clinical utility were found.
Discussion and conclusion: This study suggests that the Swiss-French version of the Braden QD Scale is reliable, valid, feasible, and has clinical utility.