Improved Prediction of Perimetric Loss in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Latent Class Mixed Modeling

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.05.003
Swarup S. Swaminathan MD , Alessandro A. Jammal MD, PhD , J. Sunil Rao PhD , Felipe A. Medeiros MD, PhD
{"title":"Improved Prediction of Perimetric Loss in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Latent Class Mixed Modeling","authors":"Swarup S. Swaminathan MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro A. Jammal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;J. Sunil Rao PhD ,&nbsp;Felipe A. Medeiros MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate whether the identification of distinct classes within a population of glaucoma patients improves estimates of future perimetric loss.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 6558 eyes of 3981 subjects from the Duke Ophthalmic<span> Registry with ≥ 5 reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) tests and ≥ 2 years of follow-up.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Standard automated perimetry mean deviation (MD) values were extracted with associated timepoints. Latent class mixed models (LCMMs) were used to identify distinct subgroups (classes) of eyes according to rates of perimetric change over time. Rates for individual eyes were then estimated by considering both individual eye data and the most probable class membership for that eye. Data were split into training (80%) and test sets (20%), and test set mean squared prediction errors (MSPEs) were estimated using LCMM and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Rates of change in SAP MD in each class and MSPE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dataset contained 52 900 SAP tests with an average of 8.1 ± 3.7 tests per eye. The best-fitting LCMM contained 5 classes with rates of −0.06, −0.21, −0.87, −2.15, and +1.28dB/year (80.0%, 10.2%, 7.5%, 1.3%, and 1.0% of the population, respectively) labeled as slow, moderate, fast, catastrophic progressors, and “improvers” respectively. Fast and catastrophic progressors were older (64.1 ± 13.7 and 63.5 ± 16.9 vs. 57.8 ± 15.8, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and had generally mild-moderate disease at baseline (65.7% and 71% vs. 52%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than slow progressors. The MSPE was significantly lower for LCMM compared to OLS, regardless of the number of tests used to obtain the rate of change (5.1 ± 0.6 vs. 60.2 ± 37.9, 4.9 ± 0.5 vs. 13.4 ± 3.2, 5.6 ± 0.8 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1, 3.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.5 ± 1.1 when predicting the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh visual fields (VFs) respectively; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). MSPE of fast and catastrophic progressors was significantly lower with LCMM versus OLS (17.7 ± 6.9 vs. 48.1 ± 19.7, 27.1 ± 8.4 vs. 81.3 ± 27.1, 49.0 ± 14.7 vs. 183.9 ± 55.2, 46.6 ± 16.0 vs. 232.4 ± 78.0 when predicting the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh VFs respectively; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Latent class mixed model successfully identified distinct classes of progressors within a large glaucoma population that seemed to reflect subgroups observed in clinical practice. Latent class mixed models were superior to OLS regression in predicting future VF observations.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosuremay be found after the references.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 642-650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether the identification of distinct classes within a population of glaucoma patients improves estimates of future perimetric loss.

Design

Longitudinal cohort study.

Participants

A total of 6558 eyes of 3981 subjects from the Duke Ophthalmic Registry with ≥ 5 reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) tests and ≥ 2 years of follow-up.

Methods

Standard automated perimetry mean deviation (MD) values were extracted with associated timepoints. Latent class mixed models (LCMMs) were used to identify distinct subgroups (classes) of eyes according to rates of perimetric change over time. Rates for individual eyes were then estimated by considering both individual eye data and the most probable class membership for that eye. Data were split into training (80%) and test sets (20%), and test set mean squared prediction errors (MSPEs) were estimated using LCMM and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression.

Main Outcome Measures

Rates of change in SAP MD in each class and MSPE.

Results

The dataset contained 52 900 SAP tests with an average of 8.1 ± 3.7 tests per eye. The best-fitting LCMM contained 5 classes with rates of −0.06, −0.21, −0.87, −2.15, and +1.28dB/year (80.0%, 10.2%, 7.5%, 1.3%, and 1.0% of the population, respectively) labeled as slow, moderate, fast, catastrophic progressors, and “improvers” respectively. Fast and catastrophic progressors were older (64.1 ± 13.7 and 63.5 ± 16.9 vs. 57.8 ± 15.8, P < 0.001) and had generally mild-moderate disease at baseline (65.7% and 71% vs. 52%, P < 0.001) than slow progressors. The MSPE was significantly lower for LCMM compared to OLS, regardless of the number of tests used to obtain the rate of change (5.1 ± 0.6 vs. 60.2 ± 37.9, 4.9 ± 0.5 vs. 13.4 ± 3.2, 5.6 ± 0.8 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1, 3.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.5 ± 1.1 when predicting the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh visual fields (VFs) respectively; P < 0.001 for all comparisons). MSPE of fast and catastrophic progressors was significantly lower with LCMM versus OLS (17.7 ± 6.9 vs. 48.1 ± 19.7, 27.1 ± 8.4 vs. 81.3 ± 27.1, 49.0 ± 14.7 vs. 183.9 ± 55.2, 46.6 ± 16.0 vs. 232.4 ± 78.0 when predicting the fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh VFs respectively; P < 0.001 for all comparisons).

Conclusions

Latent class mixed model successfully identified distinct classes of progressors within a large glaucoma population that seemed to reflect subgroups observed in clinical practice. Latent class mixed models were superior to OLS regression in predicting future VF observations.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosuremay be found after the references.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用潜在类别混合模型改进青光眼周视缺损的预测。
目的:评价在青光眼患者群体中区分不同类别是否能改善对未来视界损失的估计。设计:纵向队列研究。参与者:来自杜克眼科注册中心的3981名受试者,6558只眼睛,进行≥5次可靠的标准自动视野测量(SAP)测试,随访≥2年。方法:提取标准的自动视距平均偏差(MD)值及相关时间点。使用潜在类别混合模型(LCMMs)根据随时间的周长变化率来识别不同的眼睛亚组(类别)。然后通过考虑单个眼睛的数据和该眼睛最可能的类别成员来估计单个眼睛的比率。将数据分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%),并使用LCMM和普通最小二乘(OLS)回归估计测试集均方预测误差(mspe)。主要结果测量:每个班级和MSPE中SAP MD的变化率。结果:该数据集包含52 900次SAP测试,平均每只眼睛8.1±3.7次测试。最佳拟合LCMM包含5个类别,分别为-0.06,-0.21,-0.87,-2.15和+1.28dB/年(分别占人口的80.0%,10.2%,7.5%,1.3%和1.0%),分别标记为缓慢,中等,快速,灾难性进展和“改善”。快速和灾难性进展者比缓慢进展者年龄更大(64.1±13.7和63.5±16.9对57.8±15.8,P < 0.001),基线时一般为轻中度疾病(65.7%和71%对52%,P < 0.001)。在预测第4、第5、第6和第7视野(VFs)时,LCMM的MSPE与OLS相比显著降低,与获得变化率的试验次数无关(分别为5.1±0.6 vs. 60.2±37.9,4.9±0.5 vs. 13.4±3.2,5.6±0.8 vs. 8.1±1.1,3.4±0.3 vs. 5.5±1.1);所有比较P < 0.001)。在预测第4、5、6、7次VFs时,LCMM对快速进展者和灾难性进展者的MSPE显著低于OLS(17.7±6.9 vs 48.1±19.7,27.1±8.4 vs 81.3±27.1,49.0±14.7 vs 183.9±55.2,46.6±16.0 vs 232.4±78.0);所有比较P < 0.001)。结论:潜在类别混合模型成功地识别了大量青光眼人群中不同类别的进展者,这些进展者似乎反映了临床实践中观察到的亚组。潜在类别混合模型在预测未来VF观测值方面优于OLS回归。财务披露:可在参考文献后找到专有或商业披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Editorial Board Contents Posterior Capsular Pigment Deposition in a Case of Pigmentary Glaucoma Iridoschisis: The Shredded Iris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1