Association between newborn hypoglycemia screening and breastfeeding success in an Ottawa, Ontario, hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210324
Michael Saginur, Joseph Abdulnour, Eva Guérin, Xaand Bancroft, Daniel J Corsi, Vincent Della Zazzera, El Mostafa Bouattane
{"title":"Association between newborn hypoglycemia screening and breastfeeding success in an Ottawa, Ontario, hospital: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Michael Saginur,&nbsp;Joseph Abdulnour,&nbsp;Eva Guérin,&nbsp;Xaand Bancroft,&nbsp;Daniel J Corsi,&nbsp;Vincent Della Zazzera,&nbsp;El Mostafa Bouattane","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been limited investigation of the unintended effects of routine screening for asymptomatic hypoglycemia in at-risk newborns. This study aimed to explore whether rates of exclusive breastfeeding were lower in screened babies than in unscreened babies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study conducted in Ottawa, Canada, used data from Hôpital Montfort's electronic health information system. Healthy singleton newborns discharged between Feb. 1, 2014, and June 30, 2018, were included. We excluded babies and mothers with conditions expected to interfere with breastfeeding (e.g., twins). We investigated the association between postnatal screening for hypoglycemia and initial exclusive breastfeeding (in the first 24 hours of life).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 965 newborns; of these, 1952 (17.8%) were fully screened for hypoglycemia. Of screened newborns, 30.6% exclusively breastfed and 64.6% took both formula and breastmilk in the first 24 hours of life. Of unscreened newborns, 45.4% exclusively breastfed and 49.8% received both formula and breastmilk. The adjusted odds ratio for exclusive breastfeeding in the first 24 hours of life among newborns screened for hypoglycemia was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.64).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The association of routine newborn hypoglycemia screening with a lower initial rate of exclusive breastfeeding suggests a potential effect of screening on early breastfeeding success. Confirmation of these findings might warrant a re-evaluation of the net benefit of asymptomatic postnatal hypoglycemia screening for different newborn populations at risk of hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 2","pages":"E381-E388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/cd/cmajo.20210324.PMC10139071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been limited investigation of the unintended effects of routine screening for asymptomatic hypoglycemia in at-risk newborns. This study aimed to explore whether rates of exclusive breastfeeding were lower in screened babies than in unscreened babies.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study conducted in Ottawa, Canada, used data from Hôpital Montfort's electronic health information system. Healthy singleton newborns discharged between Feb. 1, 2014, and June 30, 2018, were included. We excluded babies and mothers with conditions expected to interfere with breastfeeding (e.g., twins). We investigated the association between postnatal screening for hypoglycemia and initial exclusive breastfeeding (in the first 24 hours of life).

Results: We included 10 965 newborns; of these, 1952 (17.8%) were fully screened for hypoglycemia. Of screened newborns, 30.6% exclusively breastfed and 64.6% took both formula and breastmilk in the first 24 hours of life. Of unscreened newborns, 45.4% exclusively breastfed and 49.8% received both formula and breastmilk. The adjusted odds ratio for exclusive breastfeeding in the first 24 hours of life among newborns screened for hypoglycemia was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.64).

Interpretation: The association of routine newborn hypoglycemia screening with a lower initial rate of exclusive breastfeeding suggests a potential effect of screening on early breastfeeding success. Confirmation of these findings might warrant a re-evaluation of the net benefit of asymptomatic postnatal hypoglycemia screening for different newborn populations at risk of hypoglycemia.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省渥太华一家医院新生儿低血糖筛查与母乳喂养成功之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:对高危新生儿无症状低血糖常规筛查的意外影响进行了有限的调查。本研究旨在探讨筛查婴儿的纯母乳喂养率是否低于未筛查婴儿。方法:这项回顾性队列研究在加拿大渥太华进行,使用Hôpital Montfort电子健康信息系统的数据。纳入2014年2月1日至2018年6月30日出院的健康单胎新生儿。我们排除了可能影响母乳喂养的婴儿和母亲(如双胞胎)。我们调查了产后低血糖筛查与最初纯母乳喂养(出生后24小时内)之间的关系。结果:纳入新生儿10 965例;其中,1952例(17.8%)进行了低血糖全面筛查。在接受筛查的新生儿中,30.6%的人接受纯母乳喂养,64.6%的人在出生后24小时内同时服用配方奶和母乳。在未接受筛查的新生儿中,45.4%是纯母乳喂养,49.8%是配方奶和母乳混合喂养。经低血糖筛查的新生儿在出生后24小时内纯母乳喂养的调整优势比为0.57(95%可信区间0.51-0.64)。解释:常规新生儿低血糖筛查与较低的初始纯母乳喂养率的关联表明筛查对早期母乳喂养成功率有潜在影响。确认这些发现可能需要重新评估无症状产后低血糖筛查对不同低血糖风险新生儿群体的净收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1