Improving Cancer Survivorship Care for Latino Adolescent, Young Adult Survivors through Community-Partnered Participatory Research.

Jacqueline N Casillas, Patricia A Ganz, Katherine Kahn, Margaret Stuber, Roshan Bastani, Lindsay F Schwartz, Sonia Morales, Joshua Macadangdang, Emma K Lidington, Karla Quintana, Amri Gonzalez, Esther Casas, Elvia Barboa
{"title":"Improving Cancer Survivorship Care for Latino Adolescent, Young Adult Survivors through Community-Partnered Participatory Research.","authors":"Jacqueline N Casillas,&nbsp;Patricia A Ganz,&nbsp;Katherine Kahn,&nbsp;Margaret Stuber,&nbsp;Roshan Bastani,&nbsp;Lindsay F Schwartz,&nbsp;Sonia Morales,&nbsp;Joshua Macadangdang,&nbsp;Emma K Lidington,&nbsp;Karla Quintana,&nbsp;Amri Gonzalez,&nbsp;Esther Casas,&nbsp;Elvia Barboa","doi":"10.35844/001c.29534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minority adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience disparities in receipt of survivorship care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the infrastructure of a community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) project between a community-based organization and a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center to develop culturally-tailored interventions to improve Latino AYA cancer survivor knowledge regarding their need for survivorship care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research team participants included the community organization and NCI cancer center directors, a research coordinator, a community liaison, and cross-training program interns. Through use of Jones's theoretical framework, additional stakeholders from academic and community settings were identified and invited to participate in the research team. A process evaluation and qualitative interviews were conducted to assess equal partnership between community and academic stakeholders and determine if the infrastructure followed the five core principles of CPPR. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPPR between an NCI-designated cancer center and a community-based organization is a new research model for conducting minority AYA cancer survivor outreach. Open communication was critical in engaging the Latino community to discuss their survivorship needs. Community stakeholders were key to infrastructure success through fostering a cohesive partnership with and acting as the voice of the Latino community. Implementing a cross-training program promoted continued engagement of community members with academic partners. Proper infrastructure development is critical to building successful research partnerships in order to develop culturally-tailored interventions to improve survivorship care knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237623/pdf/nihms-1902446.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.29534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Minority adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience disparities in receipt of survivorship care.

Objective: This study describes the infrastructure of a community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) project between a community-based organization and a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center to develop culturally-tailored interventions to improve Latino AYA cancer survivor knowledge regarding their need for survivorship care.

Methods: Research team participants included the community organization and NCI cancer center directors, a research coordinator, a community liaison, and cross-training program interns. Through use of Jones's theoretical framework, additional stakeholders from academic and community settings were identified and invited to participate in the research team. A process evaluation and qualitative interviews were conducted to assess equal partnership between community and academic stakeholders and determine if the infrastructure followed the five core principles of CPPR. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze qualitative data.

Conclusions: CPPR between an NCI-designated cancer center and a community-based organization is a new research model for conducting minority AYA cancer survivor outreach. Open communication was critical in engaging the Latino community to discuss their survivorship needs. Community stakeholders were key to infrastructure success through fostering a cohesive partnership with and acting as the voice of the Latino community. Implementing a cross-training program promoted continued engagement of community members with academic partners. Proper infrastructure development is critical to building successful research partnerships in order to develop culturally-tailored interventions to improve survivorship care knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社区合作参与性研究改善拉丁裔青少年和年轻成人癌症幸存者的护理。
背景:少数族裔青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症幸存者在接受幸存者护理方面存在差异。目的:本研究描述了社区合作参与式研究(CPPR)项目的基础设施,该项目在社区组织和国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的癌症中心之间开展,旨在开发适合文化的干预措施,以提高拉丁裔AYA癌症幸存者对其生存护理需求的了解。方法:研究团队参与者包括社区组织和NCI癌症中心主任、研究协调员、社区联络员和交叉培训项目实习生。通过使用Jones的理论框架,从学术和社区环境中确定并邀请其他利益相关者参与研究团队。进行了过程评估和定性访谈,以评估社区和学术利益相关者之间的平等伙伴关系,并确定基础设施是否遵循CPPR的五项核心原则。采用扎根理论方法分析定性数据。结论:nci指定的癌症中心与社区组织之间的CPPR是开展少数族裔AYA癌症幸存者外展的新研究模式。开放的沟通对于拉丁裔社区参与讨论他们的生存需求至关重要。社区利益相关者是基础设施建设成功的关键,他们与拉丁裔社区建立了紧密的伙伴关系,并充当了拉丁裔社区的代言人。实施交叉培训计划促进了社区成员与学术合作伙伴的持续接触。适当的基础设施发展对于建立成功的研究伙伴关系至关重要,以便开发适合文化的干预措施,以改善幸存者护理知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: ”How Communities and Research Institutions Work Together to Dismantle Structural Racism and Advance Health Equity” Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services The Equity-Centered Participatory Compensation Model (EPCM): A Tutorial for This Emergent Methodology Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1