Comparison of the biomechanical properties of internal fixation materials for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, A finite element analysis

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101534
{"title":"Comparison of the biomechanical properties of internal fixation materials for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, A finite element analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>Regarding the three distinct types of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, this study developed finite element models<span> (FEMs) of absorbable material and titanium material for repair and fixation, respectively. By applying a force of 120 N to the model to simulate the masseter muscle </span></span>strength<span>, the maximum stress and displacement of the repair materials and the fracture ends were measured. In discussing various models, the maximum stress values of absorbable and titanium materials are less than their yield strength, and the maximum displacement values of the titanium material and fracture end were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. The maximum displacement values of absorbable material and fracture end in incomplete zygomatic fracture and dislocation were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. While in the zygomatic complex complete fractures and dislocation, the maximum displacement values of the absorbable material and the fracture end exceeded 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. Consequently, the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the two materials was 0.08 mm, and the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the fracture ends was 0.22 mm, despite the fact that the absorbable material can withstand the fracture end's strength, it is not as stable as the titanium material.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785523001556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regarding the three distinct types of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, this study developed finite element models (FEMs) of absorbable material and titanium material for repair and fixation, respectively. By applying a force of 120 N to the model to simulate the masseter muscle strength, the maximum stress and displacement of the repair materials and the fracture ends were measured. In discussing various models, the maximum stress values of absorbable and titanium materials are less than their yield strength, and the maximum displacement values of the titanium material and fracture end were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. The maximum displacement values of absorbable material and fracture end in incomplete zygomatic fracture and dislocation were less than 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. While in the zygomatic complex complete fractures and dislocation, the maximum displacement values of the absorbable material and the fracture end exceeded 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm. Consequently, the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the two materials was 0.08 mm, and the distinction between the maximum displacement values of the fracture ends was 0.22 mm, despite the fact that the absorbable material can withstand the fracture end's strength, it is not as stable as the titanium material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颧颌复合体骨折内固定材料生物力学性能的比较,有限元分析。
关于三种不同类型的颧颌复合体(ZMC)骨折,本研究分别开发了可吸收材料和钛材料的有限元模型(FEM),用于修复和固定。通过向模型施加120N的力来模拟咬肌强度,测量修复材料和骨折端的最大应力和位移。在讨论各种模型时可吸收材料和钛材料的最大应力值小于它们的屈服强度,钛材料和骨折端的最大位移值分别小于0.1mm和0.2mm。不完全颧骨骨折脱位中可吸收材料和骨折末端的最大位移量分别小于0.1mmm和0.2mm,而在颧骨复合体完全骨折脱位中,可吸收材料和断裂端的最大位移值分别超过0.1mm和0.2mm。因此,尽管可吸收材料能够承受断裂端的强度,但这两种材料的最大位移量之间的差异为0.08mm,断裂端的最高位移量之间差异为0.22mm,它不如钛材料稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Is panoramic radiography adequate for diagnosing coronoid process hyperplasia? A case series Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE): Case report of a 63-year-old male patient with a rare self-healing oral mucosal lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1