Yanan Dang, Yiannis Koutedakis, Ruoling Chen, Matthew Wyon
{"title":"Online Dance Injury Monitoring: The Efficacy of Weekly Reporting and Respondent Compliance Over a 30-Week Period.","authors":"Yanan Dang, Yiannis Koutedakis, Ruoling Chen, Matthew Wyon","doi":"10.1177/1089313X231177172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous injury survey recall methods often use one-off questionnaires with varying periods of recall. These methods have proven to show injury incidence inaccuracies and limited information on injury etiology.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of a remote weekly self-report injury incidence and etiology tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two online questionnaires were developed based on the \"Fit to Dance 2\" survey and sent to volunteers. The first questionnaire was sent once and asked for complete injury history information. The second questionnaire was sent to each respondent on a weekly basis and it focused on new injuries and their causes and whether injuries that occurred in previous weeks were still affecting their dancing. The online survey was opened for full-time dance students from September 2020 to July 2021. All weekly data for each respondent were combined with a unique reference code using their account names, students' numbers, and schools' names. The proportion of participants who drop out is defined as the measurement of outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 756 respondents engaged in the survey from 16 different Chinese dance schools; the drop-out rate was 70.1%, with student respondents under 18 years old having a slightly lower drop-out rate than adult respondents (69%vs 71%). 33 respondents (4.4%) who completed all 30 weeks survey. These data allow other researchers to examine respondent compliance rates from a weekly survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A reminder system and teacher engagement could potentially increase the response rate. For frequent completion questionnaires the design needs to be streamlined to increase compliance. It is concluded that the researchers would need to weigh reduced completion rates (<100%) against data efficacy to achieve generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":"27 2","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X231177172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous injury survey recall methods often use one-off questionnaires with varying periods of recall. These methods have proven to show injury incidence inaccuracies and limited information on injury etiology.
Purpose: The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of a remote weekly self-report injury incidence and etiology tool.
Methods: Two online questionnaires were developed based on the "Fit to Dance 2" survey and sent to volunteers. The first questionnaire was sent once and asked for complete injury history information. The second questionnaire was sent to each respondent on a weekly basis and it focused on new injuries and their causes and whether injuries that occurred in previous weeks were still affecting their dancing. The online survey was opened for full-time dance students from September 2020 to July 2021. All weekly data for each respondent were combined with a unique reference code using their account names, students' numbers, and schools' names. The proportion of participants who drop out is defined as the measurement of outcome.
Results: A total of 756 respondents engaged in the survey from 16 different Chinese dance schools; the drop-out rate was 70.1%, with student respondents under 18 years old having a slightly lower drop-out rate than adult respondents (69%vs 71%). 33 respondents (4.4%) who completed all 30 weeks survey. These data allow other researchers to examine respondent compliance rates from a weekly survey.
Conclusion: A reminder system and teacher engagement could potentially increase the response rate. For frequent completion questionnaires the design needs to be streamlined to increase compliance. It is concluded that the researchers would need to weigh reduced completion rates (<100%) against data efficacy to achieve generalizability.
背景:以往损伤调查的回忆方法多采用一次性问卷,具有不同的回忆期。这些方法已被证明显示出损伤发生率的不准确性和损伤病因学的有限信息。目的:本研究旨在检验远程每周自我报告损伤发生率和病因工具的有效性。方法:在“Fit to Dance 2”调查的基础上,制作两份在线问卷,发放给志愿者。第一份问卷发送一次,询问完整的损伤史信息。第二份调查问卷每周发给每位受访者,调查的重点是新的伤害及其原因,以及前几周发生的伤害是否仍在影响他们的舞蹈。这项在线调查于2020年9月至2021年7月对全日制舞蹈学生开放。每个受访者的所有每周数据都与使用其帐户名称、学生号码和学校名称的唯一参考代码相结合。参与者退出的比例被定义为结果的度量。结果:共有来自16所不同的中国舞蹈学校的756名受访者参与了调查;辍学率为70.1%,18岁以下学生的辍学率略低于成人(69%对71%)。33名受访者(4.4%)完成了所有30周的调查。这些数据使其他研究人员能够从每周的调查中检查受访者的依从率。结论:提醒系统和教师参与可以潜在地提高回复率。对于频繁完成的问卷,设计需要被简化以增加遵从性。结论是,研究人员需要权衡降低的完成率(