Radiographic marginal bone level evaluation around two different tissue-level implant systems: a one-year prospective study.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Minerva dental and oral science Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-16 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04786-1
Sandrine Abi Rached, Carole Chakar, Rawad Samarani, Gabriel Menassa, Salvatore Sembronio, Resi Pucci, Leonardo Calabrese, Stefania Cantore, Annarita Malcangi, Francesca Spirito, Michele DI Cosola
{"title":"Radiographic marginal bone level evaluation around two different tissue-level implant systems: a one-year prospective study.","authors":"Sandrine Abi Rached, Carole Chakar, Rawad Samarani, Gabriel Menassa, Salvatore Sembronio, Resi Pucci, Leonardo Calabrese, Stefania Cantore, Annarita Malcangi, Francesca Spirito, Michele DI Cosola","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04786-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Marginal bone loss, is a frequently reported variable in the evaluation of dental implants. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate radiographic marginal bone level changes around the two different tissue-level implant systems placed adjacently in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The influence of implant macro-geometry and vertical soft tissue thickness on marginal bone loss were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven patients were included in the study and a total of 18 implants were analyzed. Each patient received two different implants placed adjacently in the maxilla or the mandible. The implants used in our study were either Straumann<sup>®</sup> SP cylindrical implants or JD Octa<sup>®</sup> tapered implants. During the surgery, vertical soft-tissue thickness was measured with a periodontal probe placed on the top of the bony crest and in the center of the future implant site. Healing abutments were then seated. Three months following implant placement, impressions were taken, and screw-retained metal ceramic prostheses were delivered. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken immediately after implant placement and one year following implant loading in order to assess marginal bone level changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.55±0.5 mm for Straumann<sup>®</sup> SP implants and 0.39±0.49 mm for JD Octa<sup>®</sup> implants after one year of loading and the difference was not statistically significant between the two systems. A statistically significant correlation was found between soft tissue thickness and marginal bone loss; in sites with thin mucosal tissues (≤2 mm), there was significantly greater bone loss compared to sites with thick, soft tissues (> 2 mm) in both implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiographic marginal bone loss was not statistically different between the two implant systems at the one-year examination period. Moreover, vertical soft tissue thickness influenced marginal bone loss regardless of the implant system used.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04786-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marginal bone loss, is a frequently reported variable in the evaluation of dental implants. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate radiographic marginal bone level changes around the two different tissue-level implant systems placed adjacently in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The influence of implant macro-geometry and vertical soft tissue thickness on marginal bone loss were also evaluated.

Methods: Seven patients were included in the study and a total of 18 implants were analyzed. Each patient received two different implants placed adjacently in the maxilla or the mandible. The implants used in our study were either Straumann® SP cylindrical implants or JD Octa® tapered implants. During the surgery, vertical soft-tissue thickness was measured with a periodontal probe placed on the top of the bony crest and in the center of the future implant site. Healing abutments were then seated. Three months following implant placement, impressions were taken, and screw-retained metal ceramic prostheses were delivered. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken immediately after implant placement and one year following implant loading in order to assess marginal bone level changes.

Results: Results showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.55±0.5 mm for Straumann® SP implants and 0.39±0.49 mm for JD Octa® implants after one year of loading and the difference was not statistically significant between the two systems. A statistically significant correlation was found between soft tissue thickness and marginal bone loss; in sites with thin mucosal tissues (≤2 mm), there was significantly greater bone loss compared to sites with thick, soft tissues (> 2 mm) in both implants.

Conclusions: Radiographic marginal bone loss was not statistically different between the two implant systems at the one-year examination period. Moreover, vertical soft tissue thickness influenced marginal bone loss regardless of the implant system used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对两种不同组织级种植系统周围的边缘骨水平进行放射学评估:为期一年的前瞻性研究。
背景:边缘骨质流失是牙科植入物评估中经常报告的一个变量。本研究的主要目的是评估两种不同组织水平的种植体系统在上颌骨或下颌骨后部相邻位置周围的边缘骨量变化。研究还评估了种植体宏观几何形状和垂直软组织厚度对边缘骨流失的影响:研究共纳入了七名患者,对 18 个种植体进行了分析。每名患者都接受了两个不同的种植体,分别植入上颌或下颌。研究中使用的种植体是 Straumann® SP 圆柱形种植体或 JD Octa® 锥形种植体。手术过程中,使用牙周探针在骨嵴顶部和未来种植部位的中心测量垂直软组织厚度。然后安装愈合基台。植入种植体三个月后,取印模,并制作螺钉固位的金属陶瓷修复体。种植体植入后立即拍摄标准化的口内X光片,种植体植入一年后拍摄标准化的口内X光片,以评估边缘骨水平的变化:结果:结果显示,Straumann® SP种植体植入一年后的平均边缘骨量损失为0.55±0.5毫米,JD Octa®种植体植入一年后的平均边缘骨量损失为0.39±0.49毫米。软组织厚度与边缘骨量损失之间存在统计学意义上的相关性;在粘膜组织较薄(≤2 mm)的部位,两种种植体的骨量损失都明显大于软组织较厚(> 2 mm)的部位:结论:在为期一年的检查中,两种种植体系统的边缘骨量损失在统计学上没有差异。此外,无论使用哪种种植体系统,垂直方向的软组织厚度都会影响边缘骨量的流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
In-silico immunoinformatic vaccine design for Treponema denticola ergothionase. Virtual reality in specialized dentistry: employing virtual reality for the alleviation of pain and anxiety in hereditary angioedema patients. Medico-legal considerations in immediate loading implantology: risks, responsibilities, and best practices. Restorative and endodontic clinical strategies during COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a revision of the literature. A simple method to identify implant sites in totally edentulous arches: a pilot study with thermo-printed templates used with cone beam computed tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1