Periaqueductal gray matter and medial prefrontal cortex reflect negative prediction errors during differential conditioning.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Social cognitive and affective neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1093/scan/nsad025
Adam X Gorka, Ryan T Philips, Salvatore Torrisi, Adrienne Manbeck, Madeline Goodwin, Monique Ernst, Christian Grillon
{"title":"Periaqueductal gray matter and medial prefrontal cortex reflect negative prediction errors during differential conditioning.","authors":"Adam X Gorka, Ryan T Philips, Salvatore Torrisi, Adrienne Manbeck, Madeline Goodwin, Monique Ernst, Christian Grillon","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsad025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational models of associative learning posit that negative prediction errors arising from the omission of aversive outcomes weaken aversive Pavlovian associations during differential conditioning and extinction. It is possible that negative prediction errors may underlie exaggerated conditioned responses to the CS- during differential conditioning and to the CS+ during extinction in patients with clinical anxiety disorders. Although previous research has demonstrated that manipulations of the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) interfere with extinction learning in animals, the role of the PAG in processing negative prediction errors within the human brain is presently unclear. We set out to investigate how PAG BOLD responses and connectivity are impacted by negative prediction errors using ultra-high field (7T) functional MRI and hierarchical Bayesian analysis. During differential conditioning, negative prediction errors were associated with larger BOLD responses within the lateral and dorsolateral PAG and increased connectivity between the dorsolateral PAG and medial areas of Brodmann area 9. The relationship between negative prediction errors and BOLD responses during extinction was not significant. Collectively, these results shed light on the association between activity within the PAG and medial prefrontal cortex and the omission of aversive outcomes during Pavlovian learning.","PeriodicalId":21789,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205175/pdf/nsad025.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational models of associative learning posit that negative prediction errors arising from the omission of aversive outcomes weaken aversive Pavlovian associations during differential conditioning and extinction. It is possible that negative prediction errors may underlie exaggerated conditioned responses to the CS- during differential conditioning and to the CS+ during extinction in patients with clinical anxiety disorders. Although previous research has demonstrated that manipulations of the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) interfere with extinction learning in animals, the role of the PAG in processing negative prediction errors within the human brain is presently unclear. We set out to investigate how PAG BOLD responses and connectivity are impacted by negative prediction errors using ultra-high field (7T) functional MRI and hierarchical Bayesian analysis. During differential conditioning, negative prediction errors were associated with larger BOLD responses within the lateral and dorsolateral PAG and increased connectivity between the dorsolateral PAG and medial areas of Brodmann area 9. The relationship between negative prediction errors and BOLD responses during extinction was not significant. Collectively, these results shed light on the association between activity within the PAG and medial prefrontal cortex and the omission of aversive outcomes during Pavlovian learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导水管周围灰质和内侧前额叶皮层反映了差异条件作用下的负面预测误差。
联想学习的计算模型假设,在差异条件作用和消退过程中,由于厌恶结果的遗漏而产生的负面预测误差(PEs)削弱了厌恶的巴甫洛夫联想。在临床焦虑障碍患者中,在差异条件反射过程中,对条件刺激未伴随不良结果(CS-)和在消退过程中对条件刺激最初伴随不良结果(CS+)的条件反应可能是负pe的基础。尽管先前的研究表明,对输水导管周围灰质(PAG)的操作会干扰动物的灭绝学习,但PAG在人脑中处理负PEs中的作用目前尚不清楚。我们利用超高场(7t)功能磁共振成像和分层贝叶斯分析研究了负PEs对PAG反应和连通性的影响。在差异条件下,负PEs与PAG外侧和背外侧的更大反应以及PAG背外侧与Brodmann区内侧区域之间的连通性增加有关。总的来说,这些结果揭示了PAG和内侧前额叶皮层的活动与巴甫洛夫学习过程中厌恶结果的遗漏之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SCAN will consider research that uses neuroimaging (fMRI, MRI, PET, EEG, MEG), neuropsychological patient studies, animal lesion studies, single-cell recording, pharmacological perturbation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. SCAN will also consider submissions that examine the mediational role of neural processes in linking social phenomena to physiological, neuroendocrine, immunological, developmental, and genetic processes. Additionally, SCAN will publish papers that address issues of mental and physical health as they relate to social and affective processes (e.g., autism, anxiety disorders, depression, stress, effects of child rearing) as long as cognitive neuroscience methods are used.
期刊最新文献
The role of the Somatosensory system in the feeling of emotions: a neurostimulation study Increased sensitivity to social hierarchy during social competition versus cooperation Exposure to Community Violence as a Mechanism Linking Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Neural Responses to Reward The SocialVidStim: a video database of positive and negative social evaluation stimuli for use in social cognitive neuroscience paradigms Disrupted cognitive and affective empathy network interactions in autistic children viewing social animation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1