AppReminders - a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of a memory aid app for people with acquired brain injury.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2023.2220969
Matthew Jamieson, Heather McClelland, Nicola Goudie, Jean McFarlane, Breda Cullen, Marilyn Lennon, Stephen Brewster, Bethany Stanley, Alex McConnachie, Jonathan Evans
{"title":"AppReminders - a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of a memory aid app for people with acquired brain injury.","authors":"Matthew Jamieson, Heather McClelland, Nicola Goudie, Jean McFarlane, Breda Cullen, Marilyn Lennon, Stephen Brewster, Bethany Stanley, Alex McConnachie, Jonathan Evans","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2023.2220969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobile phone reminding apps can be used by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) to compensate for memory impairments. This pilot feasibility trial aimed to establish the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing reminder apps in an ABI community treatment setting. Adults with ABI and memory difficulty who completed the three-week baseline were randomized (<i>n</i> = 29) and allocated to Google Calendar or ApplTree app. Those who attended an intervention session (<i>n</i> = 21) watched a 30-minute video tutorial of the app then completed reminder setting assignments to ensure they could use the app. Guidance was given if needed from a clinician or researcher. Those who passed the app assignments (<i>n</i> = 19) completed a three-week follow up. Recruitment was lower than target (<i>n</i> = 50), retention rate was 65.5%, adherence rate was 73.7%. Qualitative feedback highlighted issues that may impact usability of reminding apps introduced within community brain injury rehabilitation. Feasibility results indicate a full trial would require 72 participants to demonstrate the minimally clinically important efficacy difference between apps, should a difference exist. Most participants (19 of 21) given an app could learn to use it with the short tutorial. Design features implemented in ApplTree have potential to improve the uptake and utility of reminding apps.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"535-571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2220969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile phone reminding apps can be used by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) to compensate for memory impairments. This pilot feasibility trial aimed to establish the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing reminder apps in an ABI community treatment setting. Adults with ABI and memory difficulty who completed the three-week baseline were randomized (n = 29) and allocated to Google Calendar or ApplTree app. Those who attended an intervention session (n = 21) watched a 30-minute video tutorial of the app then completed reminder setting assignments to ensure they could use the app. Guidance was given if needed from a clinician or researcher. Those who passed the app assignments (n = 19) completed a three-week follow up. Recruitment was lower than target (n = 50), retention rate was 65.5%, adherence rate was 73.7%. Qualitative feedback highlighted issues that may impact usability of reminding apps introduced within community brain injury rehabilitation. Feasibility results indicate a full trial would require 72 participants to demonstrate the minimally clinically important efficacy difference between apps, should a difference exist. Most participants (19 of 21) given an app could learn to use it with the short tutorial. Design features implemented in ApplTree have potential to improve the uptake and utility of reminding apps.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AppReminders--后天性脑损伤患者记忆辅助应用程序的可行性随机对照试验。
后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者可以使用手机提醒应用程序来弥补记忆障碍。这项试点可行性试验旨在确定在 ABI 社区治疗环境中比较提醒应用程序的随机对照试验的可行性。对完成三周基线测试的有 ABI 和记忆障碍的成年人进行随机分组(n = 29),并分配到谷歌日历或 ApplTree 应用程序。参加干预课程的人(n = 21)观看了 30 分钟的应用程序视频教程,然后完成了提醒设置作业,以确保他们能够使用该应用程序。如有需要,临床医生或研究人员会给予指导。通过应用程序作业的人员(19 人)完成了为期三周的随访。招募人数低于目标(50 人),保留率为 65.5%,坚持率为 73.7%。定性反馈强调了一些问题,这些问题可能会影响在社区脑损伤康复中引入的提醒应用程序的可用性。可行性结果表明,全面试验需要 72 名参与者,才能证明应用程序之间存在最小临床意义的疗效差异(如果存在差异的话)。大多数参与者(21 人中的 19 人)都能通过简短的教程学会使用应用程序。ApplTree 中的设计功能有可能提高提醒应用程序的使用率和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
SIFT IT: A feasibility and preliminary efficacy randomized controlled trial of a social cognition group treatment programme for people with acquired brain injury. Cognitive remediation in residential substance use treatment: A randomized stepped-wedge trial. Comparing high definition transcranial direct current stimulation to left temporoparietal junction and left inferior frontal gyrus for logopenic primary progressive aphasia: A single-case study. A qualitative study investigating the views of stroke survivors and their family members on discussing post-stroke cognitive trajectories. "Communicative competence assessment of the person with aphasia caregiver: Standardization of the ACCA-CHECKLIST".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1