Preschoolers and Adults Learn From Novel Metaphors.

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/09567976231165267
Rebecca Zhu, Alison Gopnik
{"title":"Preschoolers and Adults Learn From Novel Metaphors.","authors":"Rebecca Zhu,&nbsp;Alison Gopnik","doi":"10.1177/09567976231165267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although adults use metaphors to guide their thinking and reasoning, less is known about whether metaphors might facilitate cognition earlier in development. Previous research shows that preschoolers understand metaphors, but less is known about whether preschoolers can learn from metaphors. The current preregistered experiment investigated whether adults (<i>n</i> = 64) and 3- and 4-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 128) can use metaphors to make new inferences. In a between-subjects design, participants heard information about novel artifacts, conveyed through either only positive metaphors (e.g., \"Daxes are suns\") or positive and negative metaphors (e.g., \"Daxes are suns. Daxes are not clouds.\"). In both conditions, participants of all ages successfully formed metaphor-consistent inferences about abstract, functional features of the artifacts (e.g., that daxes light up rather than let out water). Moreover, participants frequently provided explanations appealing to the metaphors when justifying their responses. Consequently, metaphors may be a powerful learning mechanism from early childhood onward.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"696-704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231165267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although adults use metaphors to guide their thinking and reasoning, less is known about whether metaphors might facilitate cognition earlier in development. Previous research shows that preschoolers understand metaphors, but less is known about whether preschoolers can learn from metaphors. The current preregistered experiment investigated whether adults (n = 64) and 3- and 4-year-olds (n = 128) can use metaphors to make new inferences. In a between-subjects design, participants heard information about novel artifacts, conveyed through either only positive metaphors (e.g., "Daxes are suns") or positive and negative metaphors (e.g., "Daxes are suns. Daxes are not clouds."). In both conditions, participants of all ages successfully formed metaphor-consistent inferences about abstract, functional features of the artifacts (e.g., that daxes light up rather than let out water). Moreover, participants frequently provided explanations appealing to the metaphors when justifying their responses. Consequently, metaphors may be a powerful learning mechanism from early childhood onward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童和成年人从新奇的隐喻中学习。
虽然成年人使用隐喻来指导他们的思维和推理,但隐喻是否会促进早期发展的认知,我们所知甚少。先前的研究表明,学龄前儿童能够理解隐喻,但对于学龄前儿童是否能够从隐喻中学习知之甚少。目前的预注册实验调查了成年人(n = 64)和3岁和4岁儿童(n = 128)是否可以使用隐喻进行新的推理。在受试者之间的设计中,参与者听到了关于新文物的信息,这些信息要么通过积极的隐喻(例如,“dax是太阳”)传达,要么通过积极和消极的隐喻(例如,“dax是太阳”)传达。乌云不是云。”)。在这两种情况下,所有年龄的参与者都成功地对人工制品的抽象功能特征(例如,灯会发光而不是放水)形成了与隐喻一致的推论。此外,在为自己的回答辩护时,参与者经常提供吸引隐喻的解释。因此,隐喻从童年早期起就是一种强大的学习机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
期刊最新文献
People Place Larger Bets When Risky Choices Provide a Postbet Option to Cash Out. On the Unequal Burden of Obesity: Obesity's Adverse Consequences Are Contingent on Regional Obesity Prevalence. Corrigendum to "A Practical Significance Bias in Laypeople's Evaluation of Scientific Findings". Racial Minorities Face Discrimination From Across the Political Spectrum When Seeking to Form Ties on Social Media: Evidence From a Field Experiment. Gender Differences in Climbing up the Ladder: Why Experience Closes the Ambition Gender Gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1