Association Between Socioeconomic Deprivation and Orbital Trauma in a Hospital-Based Population.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-18 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2023.2225590
Saleha Z Munir, Wuqaas M Munir
{"title":"Association Between Socioeconomic Deprivation and Orbital Trauma in a Hospital-Based Population.","authors":"Saleha Z Munir, Wuqaas M Munir","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2023.2225590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the association between area-level socioeconomic deprivation and orbital trauma among emergency ophthalmology consults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using 5-year Epic data for all hospital-based ophthalmology consults at the University of Maryland Medical System, and the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) data for area-level socioeconomic deprivation. We ran multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between the DCI quintile 5 distressed score and orbital trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,811 cases of acute emergency consults were identified, of whom 750 (19.7%) had orbital trauma and 2,386 (62.6%) had other traumatic ocular emergencies. The odds of orbital trauma among people living in a distressed community were 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76) times the odds for those living in a prosperous community. Among White subjects, the odds of orbital trauma for people living in a distressed community were 1.71 (95% CI 1.12-2.62) times the odds for those living in a prosperous community; among Black subjects, the OR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.30-0.75; p-interaction = 0.0001). Among women, the OR for orbital trauma among those living in a distressed community was 0.46 (95% CI 0.29-0.71); among men, the OR was 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.97; p-interaction = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we found an inverse association between higher area-level socioeconomic deprivation and orbital trauma among both men and women. The association varied by race, such that there was an inverse association with higher deprivation among Black subjects in contrast to a positive association among White subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"210-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2023.2225590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between area-level socioeconomic deprivation and orbital trauma among emergency ophthalmology consults.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using 5-year Epic data for all hospital-based ophthalmology consults at the University of Maryland Medical System, and the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) data for area-level socioeconomic deprivation. We ran multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between the DCI quintile 5 distressed score and orbital trauma.

Results: A total of 3,811 cases of acute emergency consults were identified, of whom 750 (19.7%) had orbital trauma and 2,386 (62.6%) had other traumatic ocular emergencies. The odds of orbital trauma among people living in a distressed community were 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76) times the odds for those living in a prosperous community. Among White subjects, the odds of orbital trauma for people living in a distressed community were 1.71 (95% CI 1.12-2.62) times the odds for those living in a prosperous community; among Black subjects, the OR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.30-0.75; p-interaction = 0.0001). Among women, the OR for orbital trauma among those living in a distressed community was 0.46 (95% CI 0.29-0.71); among men, the OR was 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.97; p-interaction = 0.03).

Conclusion: Overall, we found an inverse association between higher area-level socioeconomic deprivation and orbital trauma among both men and women. The association varied by race, such that there was an inverse association with higher deprivation among Black subjects in contrast to a positive association among White subjects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院人群中社会经济贫困与眼眶创伤之间的关系
目的:研究眼科急诊中地区级社会经济贫困与眼眶外伤之间的关系:我们使用马里兰大学医疗系统所有医院眼科会诊的 5 年 Epic 数据和贫困社区指数 (DCI) 数据进行了一项横断面研究,以了解地区级社会经济贫困程度。我们运行了多变量逻辑回归模型,对年龄进行了调整,以计算DCI五分位数5困苦得分与眼眶外伤之间关系的几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):共发现 3,811 例急诊病例,其中 750 例(19.7%)有眼眶外伤,2,386 例(62.6%)有其他眼外伤急症。生活在贫困社区的人发生眼眶外伤的几率是生活在富裕社区的人的 0.59 倍(95% CI 0.46-0.76)。在白人受试者中,生活在贫困社区的人发生眼眶外伤的几率是生活在富裕社区的人的 1.71 倍(95% CI 1.12-2.62);在黑人受试者中,发生眼眶外伤的几率是 0.47 倍(95% CI 0.30-0.75;p-交互作用 = 0.0001)。在女性受试者中,生活在贫困社区的受试者发生眼眶外伤的概率为 0.46(95% CI 0.29-0.71);在男性受试者中,发生眼眶外伤的概率为 0.70(95% CI 0.52-0.97;P-交互作用 = 0.03):总体而言,我们发现在男性和女性中,较高的地区社会经济贫困程度与眼眶创伤之间存在反向关联。这种关系因种族而异,在黑人受试者中,较高的贫困程度与眼眶创伤呈反向关系,而在白人受试者中则呈正向关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Risk Screening Tool for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in a German Cohort. Feasibility and Patient Experience of a Pilot Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program in Northern Ontario. Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Dilated Fundus Examinations by Metropolitan Status from 2017-2021: An Assessment of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Weather Patterns, Patient, and Appointment Characteristics Associated with Cancellations and No-Shows in a Glaucoma Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1