Introducing FCR6-Brain: Measuring fear of cancer recurrence in brain tumor patients and their caregivers.

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npac043
Sarah Ellen Braun, Kelcie D Willis, Samantha N Mladen, Farah Aslanzadeh, Autumn Lanoye, Jenna Langbein, Morgan Reid, Ashlee R Loughan
{"title":"Introducing FCR6-Brain: Measuring fear of cancer recurrence in brain tumor patients and their caregivers.","authors":"Sarah Ellen Braun,&nbsp;Kelcie D Willis,&nbsp;Samantha N Mladen,&nbsp;Farah Aslanzadeh,&nbsp;Autumn Lanoye,&nbsp;Jenna Langbein,&nbsp;Morgan Reid,&nbsp;Ashlee R Loughan","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a psychological consequence of cancer diagnosis that impacts quality of life in neuro-oncology. However, the instruments used to assess FCR have not been tested for validity in patients with brain tumors. The present study explored the psychometric properties of a brief FCR scale in patients with primary brain tumor (PBT) and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with PBT (<i>n</i> = 165) and their caregivers (<i>n</i> = 117) completed the FCR-7-item scale (FCR7) and measures of psychological functioning. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted for both patient and caregiver FCR7. Convergent validity, prevalence, the difference between FCR in patients and caregivers, and relationships with relevant medical and demographic variables were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFAs revealed a single factor with one item demonstrating poor loading for both patients and caregivers. Removal of the item measuring hypervigilance symptoms (checking for physical signs of tumor) greatly improved the single factor metrics. The amended scale (FCR6-Brain) demonstrated good convergent validity. Caregiver FCR was significantly higher than patient. Clinical guidance to identify clinically significant FCR was introduced. Age, gender, and time since diagnosis were related to FCR, with higher FCR in younger women more recently diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FCR6-Brain is the first validated instrument to assess FCR in this population and should be used to identify individuals at risk for FCR and guide development of future psychotherapeutic interventions. This study highlights the distinct characteristics of FCR in neuro-oncology. Symptoms of hypervigilance in PBT patients need further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"9 6","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665059/pdf/npac043.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a psychological consequence of cancer diagnosis that impacts quality of life in neuro-oncology. However, the instruments used to assess FCR have not been tested for validity in patients with brain tumors. The present study explored the psychometric properties of a brief FCR scale in patients with primary brain tumor (PBT) and their caregivers.

Methods: Adult patients with PBT (n = 165) and their caregivers (n = 117) completed the FCR-7-item scale (FCR7) and measures of psychological functioning. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted for both patient and caregiver FCR7. Convergent validity, prevalence, the difference between FCR in patients and caregivers, and relationships with relevant medical and demographic variables were explored.

Results: EFAs revealed a single factor with one item demonstrating poor loading for both patients and caregivers. Removal of the item measuring hypervigilance symptoms (checking for physical signs of tumor) greatly improved the single factor metrics. The amended scale (FCR6-Brain) demonstrated good convergent validity. Caregiver FCR was significantly higher than patient. Clinical guidance to identify clinically significant FCR was introduced. Age, gender, and time since diagnosis were related to FCR, with higher FCR in younger women more recently diagnosed.

Conclusions: The FCR6-Brain is the first validated instrument to assess FCR in this population and should be used to identify individuals at risk for FCR and guide development of future psychotherapeutic interventions. This study highlights the distinct characteristics of FCR in neuro-oncology. Symptoms of hypervigilance in PBT patients need further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍FCR6-Brain:测量脑肿瘤患者及其护理人员对癌症复发的恐惧。
背景:肿瘤复发恐惧(FCR)是肿瘤诊断后的一种心理后果,影响神经肿瘤患者的生活质量。然而,用于评估FCR的仪器尚未在脑肿瘤患者中进行有效性测试。本研究探讨了简易FCR量表在原发性脑肿瘤患者及其照顾者中的心理测量特性。方法:成年PBT患者(165例)及其照顾者(117例)完成fcr -7量表(FCR7)和心理功能测量。对患者和护理人员的FCR7进行探索性因素分析(EFA)。探讨了收敛效度、患病率、患者和护理人员之间FCR的差异以及与相关医学和人口统计学变量的关系。结果:EFAs揭示了一个单一的因素,一个项目表明患者和护理人员的负荷都很差。去除测量过度警觉症状的项目(检查肿瘤的物理体征)大大改善了单因素指标。修正后的FCR6-Brain量表具有较好的收敛效度。护理者FCR显著高于患者。介绍了鉴别临床显著性FCR的临床指导。年龄、性别和诊断后的时间与FCR有关,最近诊断的年轻女性FCR较高。结论:FCR6-Brain是第一个在该人群中评估FCR的有效工具,应该用于识别FCR风险个体,并指导未来心理治疗干预措施的发展。本研究强调了FCR在神经肿瘤学中的独特特点。PBT患者的高警觉性症状需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Reviewer List for the year 2024. Should we be testing for germline and "actionable" mutations in all glioma patients? Foreword. Role of the tumor board when prescribing mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors to patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1