Building infrastructures of abortion care in an un-caring state: acompañante's carework and abortion access in Peru.

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Signs Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/723296
Deirdre Duffy, Cordelia Freeman, Sandra Rodríguez
{"title":"Building infrastructures of abortion care in an un-caring state: acompañante's carework and abortion access in Peru.","authors":"Deirdre Duffy, Cordelia Freeman, Sandra Rodríguez","doi":"10.1086/723296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For abortion seekers, Peru is an uncaring state where legal and policy interventions have resulted in violence, persecution, and neglect. This state of abortion uncare is set within historic and ongoing denials of reproductive autonomy, coercive reproductive care, and the marginalisation of abortion. Abortion is not supported, even where legally permissible. Here we explore abortion care activism within the Peruvian context, foregrounding a key mobilisation that has emerged against a state of un-care - <i>acompañante</i> carework. Through interviews with people involved in abortion access and activism in Peru, we argue that <i>acompañantes</i> have constructed an infrastructure of abortion care in Peru through the bringing together of actors, technologies, and strategies. This infrastructure is shaped by a feminist ethic of care that differs from minority world care assumptions regarding high quality abortion care in three key ways: (i) care is provided beyond the state; (ii) care is holistic; and (iii) care is collective. We argue that US feminist debates relating to the emerging hyperrestrictive state of abortion un-care as well as broader research on feminist care can learn from <i>acompañante</i> activism strategically and conceptually.</p>","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"48 3","pages":"585-608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For abortion seekers, Peru is an uncaring state where legal and policy interventions have resulted in violence, persecution, and neglect. This state of abortion uncare is set within historic and ongoing denials of reproductive autonomy, coercive reproductive care, and the marginalisation of abortion. Abortion is not supported, even where legally permissible. Here we explore abortion care activism within the Peruvian context, foregrounding a key mobilisation that has emerged against a state of un-care - acompañante carework. Through interviews with people involved in abortion access and activism in Peru, we argue that acompañantes have constructed an infrastructure of abortion care in Peru through the bringing together of actors, technologies, and strategies. This infrastructure is shaped by a feminist ethic of care that differs from minority world care assumptions regarding high quality abortion care in three key ways: (i) care is provided beyond the state; (ii) care is holistic; and (iii) care is collective. We argue that US feminist debates relating to the emerging hyperrestrictive state of abortion un-care as well as broader research on feminist care can learn from acompañante activism strategically and conceptually.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在缺乏关爱的国家建立堕胎护理基础设施:秘鲁的陪护工作和堕胎机会。
对于寻求堕胎者而言,秘鲁是一个缺乏关爱的国家,法律和政策干预导致了暴力、迫害和忽视。这种不关心堕胎的状态是建立在历史和持续剥夺生殖自主权、强制生殖保健和堕胎边缘化的基础之上的。即使在法律允许的情况下,堕胎也得不到支持。在此,我们将探讨秘鲁的堕胎关怀活动,重点关注针对无关怀状态而出现的一种重要动员--"陪伴者关怀工作"(acompañante carework)。通过对参与秘鲁堕胎服务和活动的人员进行访谈,我们认为 "陪同者 "通过汇集参与者、技术和策略,构建了秘鲁堕胎护理的基础设施。这一基础设施是由女权主义的护理伦理形成的,它在三个关键方面不同于世界少数群体对高质量人工流产护理的假设:(i) 护理是在国家之外提供的;(ii) 护理是整体性的;(iii) 护理是集体性的。我们认为,美国女权主义关于堕胎无关怀这一新兴的过度限制状态的辩论,以及关于女权主义关怀的更广泛的研究,可以从战略和概念上向 acompañante 行动主义学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
期刊最新文献
Connective Labor as Emotional Vocabulary: Inequality, Mutuality, and the Politics of Feelings in Care-Work Acuerpar: The Decolonial Feminist Call for Embodied Solidarity About the Contributors Challenging the Antipolitics of Regimes of Care: Young African Men in Italy Resist Precarious Futures Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1