Implants Placed with the All-On-4 Technique: A Radiographic Retrospective Study on 156 Implants with a 5- to 14-Year Follow-up.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.11607/prd.6013
Francesco Tironi, Francesco Orlando, Francesco Azzola, Carlo Vitelli, Luca Angelo Francetti
{"title":"Implants Placed with the All-On-4 Technique: A Radiographic Retrospective Study on 156 Implants with a 5- to 14-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Francesco Tironi,&nbsp;Francesco Orlando,&nbsp;Francesco Azzola,&nbsp;Carlo Vitelli,&nbsp;Luca Angelo Francetti","doi":"10.11607/prd.6013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of implants placed with the All-on-4 technique after a mean time in function of 9 years. A total of 34 patients with 156 implants were selected for this study: 18 patients underwent tooth extraction on the day of implant placement (Group D), and 16 patients were already edentulous (Group E). A periapical radiograph was taken at a mean follow-up of 9 years (range: 5 to 14 years). Success and survival rates and the prevalence of peri-implantitis were calculated. Statistical analysis was used to assess comparisons between groups. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, the cumulative survival rate was 97.4% and the success rate was 77.4%. The difference between the initial and final radiographs resulted in a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.3 ± 1.06 mm (range: 0.1 to 5.3 mm). No differences were seen between Groups D and E. Peri-implantitis affected 15 implants (9.6%) in 9 patients (26.5%). This study shows that the All-on-4 technique is a reliable treatment method for both edentulous patients and patients requiring tooth extractions, with results maintained over a long follow-up period. The present MBL results are similar to those around implants in other rehabilitation types.</p>","PeriodicalId":54948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of implants placed with the All-on-4 technique after a mean time in function of 9 years. A total of 34 patients with 156 implants were selected for this study: 18 patients underwent tooth extraction on the day of implant placement (Group D), and 16 patients were already edentulous (Group E). A periapical radiograph was taken at a mean follow-up of 9 years (range: 5 to 14 years). Success and survival rates and the prevalence of peri-implantitis were calculated. Statistical analysis was used to assess comparisons between groups. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, the cumulative survival rate was 97.4% and the success rate was 77.4%. The difference between the initial and final radiographs resulted in a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.3 ± 1.06 mm (range: 0.1 to 5.3 mm). No differences were seen between Groups D and E. Peri-implantitis affected 15 implants (9.6%) in 9 patients (26.5%). This study shows that the All-on-4 technique is a reliable treatment method for both edentulous patients and patients requiring tooth extractions, with results maintained over a long follow-up period. The present MBL results are similar to those around implants in other rehabilitation types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All-On-4技术植入的植入物:一项对156个植入物进行5至14年随访的放射学回顾性研究。
这项回顾性研究的目的是评估使用All-on-4技术放置的植入物在平均9年功能后的性能。本研究共选择了34名患者和156个种植体:18名患者在种植体植入当天进行了拔牙(D组),16名患者已经无牙(E组)。平均随访9年(范围:5至14年),拍摄根尖周x线片。计算成功率和生存率以及种植体周围炎的患病率。统计分析用于评估各组之间的比较。经过9年的平均随访,累积生存率为97.4%,成功率为77.4%。初次和最终X线片之间的差异导致平均边缘骨丢失(MBL)为1.3±1.06mm(范围:0.1至5.3mm)。D组和E组之间没有差异。9名患者(26.5%)的15个种植体(9.6%)受到种植体周围炎的影响。本研究表明,All-on-4技术对无牙患者和需要拔牙的患者来说都是一种可靠的治疗方法,结果在长时间的随访期内保持不变。目前的MBL结果与其他康复类型的植入物周围的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry will publish manuscripts concerned with all aspects of clinical periodontology, restorative dentistry, and implantology. This includes pertinent research as well as clinical methodology (their interdependence and relationship should be addressed where applicable); proceedings of relevant symposia or conferences; and quality review papers. Original manuscripts are considered for publication on the condition that they have not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
The Trapezoidal Sling Suture: A Technical Note of a Novel Suturing Technique for Tunneling Flap Procedures. Treatment of Mandibular Class III/IV Furcation Defects with a Combination Plastic Regenerative Technique: A Case Series. The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative to Modulate Wound Healing of Peri-implant Soft Tissues. Root Coverage and Volumetric Outcomes of a Novel Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix with the Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions: A Clinical Prospective Study. The Guided Bone Regeneration of a Large, Noncontained Maxillary Anterior Perforation Defect: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1