Do Women Physicians Accept and Follow Heart Failure Guidelines More Than Men?

IF 3.8 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Heart Failure Reports Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s11897-023-00597-y
Jesús Álvarez-García, María José Cristo Ropero, Ángel Manuel Iniesta Manjavacas, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Alberto Esteban-Fernández, Javier de Juan Bagudá, Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, Mikel Taibo Urquía, Juan Górriz-Magaña, Marta Cobo Marcos, Josebe Goirigolzarri-Artaza, Diego Iglesias Del Valle, Ramón Bover Freire, Cristina Beltrán Herrera, Adolfo Villa, Raquel Campuzano Ruiz, Manuel Martínez-Sellés
{"title":"Do Women Physicians Accept and Follow Heart Failure Guidelines More Than Men?","authors":"Jesús Álvarez-García, María José Cristo Ropero, Ángel Manuel Iniesta Manjavacas, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Alberto Esteban-Fernández, Javier de Juan Bagudá, Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, Mikel Taibo Urquía, Juan Górriz-Magaña, Marta Cobo Marcos, Josebe Goirigolzarri-Artaza, Diego Iglesias Del Valle, Ramón Bover Freire, Cristina Beltrán Herrera, Adolfo Villa, Raquel Campuzano Ruiz, Manuel Martínez-Sellés","doi":"10.1007/s11897-023-00597-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Our aim was to assess the degree of acceptance of the European Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on heart failure (HF) among Spanish physicians according to sex. This was a cross-sectional study, employing Google Forms, conducted by a group of HF experts from the Region of Madrid (Spain), between November 2021 and February 2022, among specialists and residents of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Primary Care from Spain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A total of 387 physicians-173 women (44.7%)-from 128 different centers completed the survey. Compared to men, women were significantly younger (38.2 ± 9.1 years vs. 40.6 ± 11.2 years; p = 0.024) and had fewer years of clinical practice (12.1 ± 8.1 years vs. 14.5 ± 10.7 years; p = 0.014). Briefly, women and men had a positive opinion of the guidelines and thought that implementing quadruple therapy is feasible in less than 8 weeks. Women followed more frequently than men the new paradigm of \"4 pillars at lowest doses\" and considered more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device. Although they agreed about \"low blood pressure\" as the major limitation for achieving quadruple therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there were discrepancies on the second most frequent barrier, and women were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. In a large survey including nearly 400 doctors from all over Spain to provide real-world opinion on 2021 ESC HF Guidelines and experience with SGLT2 inhibitors, women follow more frequently the new paradigm of \"4 pillars at lowest doses\", consider more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device, and were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. Further studies confirming an association of sex with a better compliance of HF guidelines are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-023-00597-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Our aim was to assess the degree of acceptance of the European Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on heart failure (HF) among Spanish physicians according to sex. This was a cross-sectional study, employing Google Forms, conducted by a group of HF experts from the Region of Madrid (Spain), between November 2021 and February 2022, among specialists and residents of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Primary Care from Spain.

Recent findings: A total of 387 physicians-173 women (44.7%)-from 128 different centers completed the survey. Compared to men, women were significantly younger (38.2 ± 9.1 years vs. 40.6 ± 11.2 years; p = 0.024) and had fewer years of clinical practice (12.1 ± 8.1 years vs. 14.5 ± 10.7 years; p = 0.014). Briefly, women and men had a positive opinion of the guidelines and thought that implementing quadruple therapy is feasible in less than 8 weeks. Women followed more frequently than men the new paradigm of "4 pillars at lowest doses" and considered more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device. Although they agreed about "low blood pressure" as the major limitation for achieving quadruple therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there were discrepancies on the second most frequent barrier, and women were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. In a large survey including nearly 400 doctors from all over Spain to provide real-world opinion on 2021 ESC HF Guidelines and experience with SGLT2 inhibitors, women follow more frequently the new paradigm of "4 pillars at lowest doses", consider more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device, and were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. Further studies confirming an association of sex with a better compliance of HF guidelines are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女医生比男医生更容易接受和遵循心力衰竭指南吗?
综述目的:我们的目的是根据性别评估西班牙医生对欧洲心力衰竭(HF)临床实践指南(CPG)的接受程度。这是一项横断面研究,由一组来自马德里地区(西班牙)的心力衰竭专家在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月期间使用谷歌表格进行,研究对象为西班牙心脏病学、内科学和初级保健的专家和住院医师:共有来自 128 个不同中心的 387 名医生--173 名女性(44.7%)--完成了调查。与男性相比,女性明显更年轻(38.2 ± 9.1 岁 vs 40.6 ± 11.2 岁;p = 0.024),临床执业年限更短(12.1 ± 8.1 年 vs 14.5 ± 10.7 年;p = 0.014)。简而言之,女性和男性都对指南持肯定态度,并认为在不到 8 周的时间内实施四联疗法是可行的。女性比男性更倾向于遵循 "最低剂量四支柱 "的新范例,更倾向于在植入心脏设备前建立四联疗法。虽然她们一致认为 "低血压 "是射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者实现四联疗法的主要限制因素,但在第二大障碍上存在差异,女性在开始使用 SGLT2 抑制剂时更加积极主动。在一项大型调查中,来自西班牙各地的近 400 名医生就 2021 ESC HF 指南和使用 SGLT2 抑制剂的经验提供了真实世界的意见,其中女性更常遵循 "最低剂量的四大支柱 "的新范例,更常考虑在植入心脏设备前建立四联疗法,并且在使用 SGLT2 抑制剂时更积极主动。还需要进一步研究证实性别与更好地遵守高血压指南之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Heart Failure Reports
Current Heart Failure Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers. Biomarkers of Hemodynamic Congestion in Heart Failure. Heart Failure in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Implications. Screening for Heart Failure: Biomarkers to Detect Heightened Risk in the General Population. Troponin Elevation in Asymptomatic Cancer Patients: Unveiling Connections and Clinical Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1