COVID-19 Vaccine Videos: Health Literacy Considerations.

Iris Feinberg, Michelle Ogrodnick, Jamie Bernhardt
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Videos: Health Literacy Considerations.","authors":"Iris Feinberg,&nbsp;Michelle Ogrodnick,&nbsp;Jamie Bernhardt","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20230523-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimedia videos are important tools to inform uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. Video design using health literacy guidelines may help optimize video usefulness. Many health organizations (HO) (provides information) and health care (HCO) (provides direct health care) organizations have used YouTube to deliver videos about COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined HO and HCO COVID-19 vaccine videos shown on YouTube for health literacy guidelines (quality, understandability and actionability).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 30 most viewed COVID-19 vaccine videos posted by HO and HCO were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the Patient Education Assessment Tool for evaluating audiovisual formats (PEMAT-AV).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>GQS scores averaged 3.12 (standard deviation [<i>SD</i>] .789), which is equivalent to 80%. Using PEMATAV, there was a relationship between actionability and quality (<i>r</i>(28) = .453, <i>p</i> < .05) for HO; for HCO, there was a relationship between usability and quality (<i>r</i>(28) = .455, <i>p</i> < .05). Odds ratio analysis showed quality in HO leading to higher odds of actionability (3.573, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.480-14.569]) and quality in HCO videos leading to higher understandability (4.093, CI [1.203-17.865]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few organizations applied all health literacy principles to video design. Video creation for mass media health campaigns by HO and HCO should include consideration of evidence-based health literacy measures (quality, understandability, actionability) to ensure intended results across viewers with different health literacy levels including communities who have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2023;7(2):e111-e118.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"7 2","pages":"e111-e118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/29/hlrp0623feinbergor-prt.PMC10256273.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20230523-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimedia videos are important tools to inform uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. Video design using health literacy guidelines may help optimize video usefulness. Many health organizations (HO) (provides information) and health care (HCO) (provides direct health care) organizations have used YouTube to deliver videos about COVID-19 vaccines.

Objective: We examined HO and HCO COVID-19 vaccine videos shown on YouTube for health literacy guidelines (quality, understandability and actionability).

Methods: The top 30 most viewed COVID-19 vaccine videos posted by HO and HCO were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the Patient Education Assessment Tool for evaluating audiovisual formats (PEMAT-AV).

Key results: GQS scores averaged 3.12 (standard deviation [SD] .789), which is equivalent to 80%. Using PEMATAV, there was a relationship between actionability and quality (r(28) = .453, p < .05) for HO; for HCO, there was a relationship between usability and quality (r(28) = .455, p < .05). Odds ratio analysis showed quality in HO leading to higher odds of actionability (3.573, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.480-14.569]) and quality in HCO videos leading to higher understandability (4.093, CI [1.203-17.865]).

Conclusion: Few organizations applied all health literacy principles to video design. Video creation for mass media health campaigns by HO and HCO should include consideration of evidence-based health literacy measures (quality, understandability, actionability) to ensure intended results across viewers with different health literacy levels including communities who have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(2):e111-e118.].

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗视频:健康素养考量。
背景:多媒体视频是宣传COVID-19疫苗接种的重要工具。使用健康素养指南的视频设计可能有助于优化视频的有用性。许多卫生组织(HO)(提供信息)和卫生保健(HCO)(提供直接卫生保健)组织使用YouTube发布有关COVID-19疫苗的视频。目的:我们检查了YouTube上播放的who和HCO COVID-19疫苗视频,以获得健康素养指南(质量、可理解性和可操作性)。方法:采用全球质量评分(GQS)和患者教育评估工具(PEMAT-AV)对HO和HCO发布的观看量最高的30个COVID-19疫苗视频进行分析。关键结果:GQS平均分3.12(标准差[SD] .789),相当于80%。使用PEMATAV, HO的可操作性与质量之间存在相关性(r(28) = 0.453, p < 0.05);对于HCO,可用性与质量之间存在关系(r(28) = .455, p < .05)。优势比分析显示,高质量的HO视频可提高可操作性的几率(3.573,95%可信区间[CI][1.480-14.569]),高质量的HCO视频可提高可理解性(4.093,CI[1.203-17.865])。结论:很少有组织将所有健康素养原则应用于视频设计。世卫组织和卫生组织为大众媒体卫生运动制作的视频应考虑以证据为基础的卫生素养措施(质量、可理解性和可操作性),以确保不同卫生素养水平的观众,包括受COVID-19影响严重的社区,都能取得预期结果。健康素养研究与实践[j].中国卫生科学,2013;7(2):e111-e118。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1