The Biomedical Subjectification of Women of Advanced Maternal Age: Reproductive Risk, Privilege, and the Illusion of Control.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Health and Social Behavior Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/00221465221136252
Emily S Mann, Dana Berkowitz
{"title":"The Biomedical Subjectification of Women of Advanced Maternal Age: Reproductive Risk, Privilege, and the Illusion of Control.","authors":"Emily S Mann,&nbsp;Dana Berkowitz","doi":"10.1177/00221465221136252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States is experiencing a demographic transition toward older motherhood. Biomedicine classifies pregnancies among all women of advanced maternal age (AMA) as high-risk; paradoxically, women having first births at AMA are typically economically and racially privileged, which can reduce the risk of risks. This article examines the implications of the biomedicalization of AMA for first-time mothers, age 35 and older, using qualitative interviews. We find participants had substantial cultural health capital, which informed their critiques of AMA and the medical model of birth. When they found themselves subjected to biomedical protocols and concerned about reproductive risk as their pregnancies progressed, their subsequent biomedical subjectification compelled most to accept biomedical interventions. Consequently, some participants had traumatic birth experiences. Our findings illustrate that while first-time mothers of AMA anticipated that they would have more control over the birth process because of their advantages, ultimately, most did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":51349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","volume":"64 2","pages":"192-208"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465221136252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The United States is experiencing a demographic transition toward older motherhood. Biomedicine classifies pregnancies among all women of advanced maternal age (AMA) as high-risk; paradoxically, women having first births at AMA are typically economically and racially privileged, which can reduce the risk of risks. This article examines the implications of the biomedicalization of AMA for first-time mothers, age 35 and older, using qualitative interviews. We find participants had substantial cultural health capital, which informed their critiques of AMA and the medical model of birth. When they found themselves subjected to biomedical protocols and concerned about reproductive risk as their pregnancies progressed, their subsequent biomedical subjectification compelled most to accept biomedical interventions. Consequently, some participants had traumatic birth experiences. Our findings illustrate that while first-time mothers of AMA anticipated that they would have more control over the birth process because of their advantages, ultimately, most did not.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高龄产妇的生物医学主体化:生殖风险、特权和控制幻觉。
美国正在经历人口结构向高龄母亲的转变。生物医学将所有高龄产妇的妊娠归类为高危妊娠;矛盾的是,在AMA生育第一胎的女性通常在经济和种族上享有特权,这可以降低风险。这篇文章探讨了AMA的生物医学化的含义,首次母亲,35岁及以上,使用定性访谈。我们发现参与者有大量的文化健康资本,这为他们对AMA和出生医学模式的批评提供了信息。当她们发现自己受到生物医学协议的约束,并在怀孕过程中担心生殖风险时,她们随后的生物医学主体化迫使大多数人接受生物医学干预。因此,一些参与者有痛苦的分娩经历。我们的研究结果表明,虽然美国医学协会的第一次妈妈们预计,由于她们的优势,她们会对分娩过程有更多的控制权,但最终,大多数人并没有这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Health and Social Behavior is a medical sociology journal that publishes empirical and theoretical articles that apply sociological concepts and methods to the understanding of health and illness and the organization of medicine and health care. Its editorial policy favors manuscripts that are grounded in important theoretical issues in medical sociology or the sociology of mental health and that advance theoretical understanding of the processes by which social factors and human health are inter-related.
期刊最新文献
Breaking Bonds, Changing Habits: Understanding Health Behaviors during and after Marital Dissolution. Upward Mobility Context and Health Outcomes and Behaviors during Transition to Adulthood: The Intersectionality of Race and Sex. Race and Place Matter: Inequity in Prenatal Care for Reservation-Dwelling American Indian People. Second-Class Care: How Immigration Law Transforms Clinical Practice in the Safety Net. Painful Subjects, Desiring Relief: Experiencing and Governing Pain in a Medical Cannabis Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1