A Closer Look—Who Are We Screening for Lung Cancer?

Kristine Galang MD , Efstathia Polychronopoulou MPH, RS, PhD , Gulshan Sharma MD , Shawn P.E. Nishi MD
{"title":"A Closer Look—Who Are We Screening for Lung Cancer?","authors":"Kristine Galang MD ,&nbsp;Efstathia Polychronopoulou MPH, RS, PhD ,&nbsp;Gulshan Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Shawn P.E. Nishi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the characteristics of individuals receiving lung cancer screening (LCS) and identify those with potentially limited benefit owing to coexisting chronic illnesses and/or comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study in the United States, patients were selected from a large clinical database who received LCS from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment. We assessed for potentially limited benefit in LCS defined strictly as not meeting the traditional risk factor inclusion criteria (age &lt;55 years or &gt;80 years, previous computed tomography scan within 11 months before an LCS examination, or a history of nonskin cancer) or liberally as having the potential exclusion criteria related to comorbid life-limiting conditions, such as cardiac and/or respiratory disease.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 51,551 patients were analyzed. Overall, 8391 (16.3%) individuals experienced a potentially limited benefit from LCS. Among those who did not meet the strict traditional inclusion criteria, 317 (3.8%) were because of age, 2350 (28%) reported a history of nonskin malignancy, and 2211 (26.3%) underwent a previous computed tomography thorax within 11 months before an LCS examination. Of those with potentially limited benefit owing to comorbidity, 3680 (43.9%) were because of severe respiratory comorbidity (937 [25.5%] with any hospitalization for coronary obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, or respiratory failure; 131 [3.6%] with hospitalization for respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; or 3197 [86.9%] with chronic obstructive disease/interstitial lung disease requiring outpatient oxygen) and 721 (8.59%) with cardiac comorbidity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Up to 1 of 6 low-dose computed tomography examinations may have limited benefit from LCS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/fb/main.PMC10244365.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the characteristics of individuals receiving lung cancer screening (LCS) and identify those with potentially limited benefit owing to coexisting chronic illnesses and/or comorbidities.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective study in the United States, patients were selected from a large clinical database who received LCS from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment. We assessed for potentially limited benefit in LCS defined strictly as not meeting the traditional risk factor inclusion criteria (age <55 years or >80 years, previous computed tomography scan within 11 months before an LCS examination, or a history of nonskin cancer) or liberally as having the potential exclusion criteria related to comorbid life-limiting conditions, such as cardiac and/or respiratory disease.

Results

A total of 51,551 patients were analyzed. Overall, 8391 (16.3%) individuals experienced a potentially limited benefit from LCS. Among those who did not meet the strict traditional inclusion criteria, 317 (3.8%) were because of age, 2350 (28%) reported a history of nonskin malignancy, and 2211 (26.3%) underwent a previous computed tomography thorax within 11 months before an LCS examination. Of those with potentially limited benefit owing to comorbidity, 3680 (43.9%) were because of severe respiratory comorbidity (937 [25.5%] with any hospitalization for coronary obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, or respiratory failure; 131 [3.6%] with hospitalization for respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; or 3197 [86.9%] with chronic obstructive disease/interstitial lung disease requiring outpatient oxygen) and 721 (8.59%) with cardiac comorbidity.

Conclusion

Up to 1 of 6 low-dose computed tomography examinations may have limited benefit from LCS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近距离观察——我们应该为哪些人筛查肺癌?
目的评估接受肺癌筛查(LCS)的个体的特征,并识别那些由于共存的慢性疾病和/或合并症而获益有限的个体。患者和方法在美国进行的这项回顾性研究中,从2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日接受LCS治疗的大型临床数据库中选择患者,至少连续入组1年。我们对LCS的潜在有限获益进行了评估,严格定义为不符合传统的风险因素纳入标准(年龄55岁或80岁,LCS检查前11个月内的计算机断层扫描,或非皮肤癌病史),或具有潜在的排除标准相关的合合性生命限制条件,如心脏和/或呼吸系统疾病。结果共分析51551例患者。总体而言,8391人(16.3%)从LCS中获益有限。在不符合严格的传统纳入标准的患者中,317例(3.8%)因年龄原因,2350例(28%)报告有非皮肤恶性肿瘤病史,2211例(26.3%)在LCS检查前11个月内接受过胸部计算机断层扫描。在因合并症而获益有限的患者中,有3680例(43.9%)是因为严重的呼吸合并症(937例(25.5%)是因为任何因冠状动脉阻塞性肺疾病、间质性肺疾病或呼吸衰竭住院治疗);131例(3.6%)因呼吸衰竭住院,需要机械通气;3197例(86.9%)患有慢性阻塞性疾病/需要门诊吸氧的间质性肺疾病,721例(8.59%)患有心脏合并症。结论6次低剂量ct检查中有1次可从LCS获益有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1