Validity and reliability of the COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale in Canadian dentists

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2877
Rachita Seth, Sreenath A. Madathil, Walter L. Siqueira, Mary McNally, Carlos R. Quiñonez, Michael Glogauer, Paul J. Allison
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale in Canadian dentists","authors":"Rachita Seth,&nbsp;Sreenath A. Madathil,&nbsp;Walter L. Siqueira,&nbsp;Mary McNally,&nbsp;Carlos R. Quiñonez,&nbsp;Michael Glogauer,&nbsp;Paul J. Allison","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a high level of mental health problems for the population worldwide including healthcare workers. Several studies have assessed these using measurements for anxiety for general populations. The COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale (C-19ASS) is a self-report measure developed to assess maladaptive forms of coping with COVID-19 (avoidance, threat monitoring and worry) among a general adult population in the United States. We used it in a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 incidence rates in practising Canadian dentists. We therefore need to ensure that it is valid for dentists in French and English languages. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the C-19ASS in that population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional data from the January 2021 monthly follow-up in our prospective cohort study were used. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results of EFA revealed a 2-factor structure solution that explained 47% of the total variance. The CFA showed a good model fit on the data in both English and French languages. The Cronbach's alpha indicated acceptable levels of reliability. Furthermore, the C-19ASS showed excellent divergent validity from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The C-19ASS is valid and reliable instrument to measure COVID-19-related anxiety in English and French among Canadian dentists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical implications</h3>\n \n <p>This validated measure will contribute to understanding of the mental health impact of the pandemic on dentists in Canada and enable the dental regulatory authorities and organizations to intervene to help dentists.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 6","pages":"1349-1356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2877","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a high level of mental health problems for the population worldwide including healthcare workers. Several studies have assessed these using measurements for anxiety for general populations. The COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale (C-19ASS) is a self-report measure developed to assess maladaptive forms of coping with COVID-19 (avoidance, threat monitoring and worry) among a general adult population in the United States. We used it in a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 incidence rates in practising Canadian dentists. We therefore need to ensure that it is valid for dentists in French and English languages. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the C-19ASS in that population.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the January 2021 monthly follow-up in our prospective cohort study were used. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed.

Results

The results of EFA revealed a 2-factor structure solution that explained 47% of the total variance. The CFA showed a good model fit on the data in both English and French languages. The Cronbach's alpha indicated acceptable levels of reliability. Furthermore, the C-19ASS showed excellent divergent validity from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale.

Conclusions

The C-19ASS is valid and reliable instrument to measure COVID-19-related anxiety in English and French among Canadian dentists.

Practical implications

This validated measure will contribute to understanding of the mental health impact of the pandemic on dentists in Canada and enable the dental regulatory authorities and organizations to intervene to help dentists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大牙医 COVID-19 焦虑综合征量表的有效性和可靠性。
背景:COVID-19 大流行导致包括医护人员在内的全球人口面临严重的心理健康问题。有几项研究使用焦虑测量法对普通人群进行了评估。COVID-19 焦虑综合征量表(C-19ASS)是一种自我报告量表,用于评估美国普通成年人应对 COVID-19 的不良形式(回避、威胁监测和担忧)。我们在一项针对加拿大执业牙医 COVID-19 发生率的前瞻性队列研究中使用了该方法。因此,我们需要确保它对使用法语和英语的牙医有效。本研究旨在评估 C-19ASS 在该人群中的有效性:研究使用了我们的前瞻性队列研究中 2021 年 1 月每月随访的横截面数据。研究进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)和确证性因子分析(CFA):EFA结果显示,2因素结构解解释了47%的总方差。确证因子分析显示,英语和法语数据的模型拟合良好。Cronbach's alpha 表示信度达到可接受水平。此外,C-19ASS 与广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)量表的发散效度非常好:结论:C-19ASS 是一种有效、可靠的工具,可用于测量加拿大牙医在英语和法语中与 COVID-19 相关的焦虑:这一经过验证的测量方法将有助于了解大流行病对加拿大牙医心理健康的影响,并使牙科监管机构和组织能够采取干预措施帮助牙医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1