Provision of Social Care Services by US Hospitals.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12653
Bradley Iott, Denise Anthony
{"title":"Provision of Social Care Services by US Hospitals.","authors":"Bradley Iott, Denise Anthony","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Hospitals address population health needs and patients' social determinants of health by offering social care services. Tax-exempt hospitals are required to invest in community benefits, including social care services programs, though most community benefits spending is toward unreimbursed health care services. Tax-exempt hospitals offer about 36% more social care services than for-profit hospitals. Among tax-exempt hospitals, those that allocate more resources to community benefits spending offer more types of social care services, but those in states with minimum community benefits spending requirements offer fewer social care services. Policymakers may consider specifically incentivizing community benefits expenditures toward particular social care services, including linking tax exemptions to implementation, utilization, and outcome targets, to more directly help patients.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Despite growing interest in identifying patients' social needs, little is known about hospitals' provision of services to address them. We identify social care services offered by US hospitals and determine whether hospital spending or state policies toward community benefits are associated with the provision of these services by tax-exempt hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National secondary data about hospitals were collected from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, with additional Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data on community benefits spending from CommunityBenefitInsight.org and state-level community benefits policies from HilltopInstitute.org. Descriptive statistics for types of social care services and hospital characteristics were calculated, with bivariate chi-square and t-tests comparing for-profit and tax-exempt hospitals. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate associations between hospital characteristics and types of services offered and among tax-exempt hospitals to estimate associations between social care services and community benefits spending and policies. Multivariable logistic regressions modeled associations between community benefits spending/policies and each type of social care services.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Private US hospitals offered an average of 5.7 types of social care services in 2018. Tax-exempt hospitals offered about 36% more social care services than for-profit hospitals. Larger number of beds, health system affiliation, and having community partnerships are associated with more social care services, whereas rural hospitals and those managed under contract offered fewer social care services. Among tax-exempt hospitals, greater community benefits spending is associated with offering more total (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.10, p < 0.01) and patient-focused social care services (IRR = 1.16, p < 0.01). Hospitals in states with minimum community benefits spending requirements offered significantly fewer social care services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although tax-exempt status and increased community benefits spending were associated with increased social care services provision, the observation that certain hospital characteristics and state minimum community benefits spending requirements were associated with fewer social care services suggests opportunities for policy reform to increase social care services implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":"101 2","pages":"601-635"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy Points Hospitals address population health needs and patients' social determinants of health by offering social care services. Tax-exempt hospitals are required to invest in community benefits, including social care services programs, though most community benefits spending is toward unreimbursed health care services. Tax-exempt hospitals offer about 36% more social care services than for-profit hospitals. Among tax-exempt hospitals, those that allocate more resources to community benefits spending offer more types of social care services, but those in states with minimum community benefits spending requirements offer fewer social care services. Policymakers may consider specifically incentivizing community benefits expenditures toward particular social care services, including linking tax exemptions to implementation, utilization, and outcome targets, to more directly help patients.

Context: Despite growing interest in identifying patients' social needs, little is known about hospitals' provision of services to address them. We identify social care services offered by US hospitals and determine whether hospital spending or state policies toward community benefits are associated with the provision of these services by tax-exempt hospitals.

Methods: National secondary data about hospitals were collected from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, with additional Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data on community benefits spending from CommunityBenefitInsight.org and state-level community benefits policies from HilltopInstitute.org. Descriptive statistics for types of social care services and hospital characteristics were calculated, with bivariate chi-square and t-tests comparing for-profit and tax-exempt hospitals. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate associations between hospital characteristics and types of services offered and among tax-exempt hospitals to estimate associations between social care services and community benefits spending and policies. Multivariable logistic regressions modeled associations between community benefits spending/policies and each type of social care services.

Findings: Private US hospitals offered an average of 5.7 types of social care services in 2018. Tax-exempt hospitals offered about 36% more social care services than for-profit hospitals. Larger number of beds, health system affiliation, and having community partnerships are associated with more social care services, whereas rural hospitals and those managed under contract offered fewer social care services. Among tax-exempt hospitals, greater community benefits spending is associated with offering more total (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.10, p < 0.01) and patient-focused social care services (IRR = 1.16, p < 0.01). Hospitals in states with minimum community benefits spending requirements offered significantly fewer social care services.

Conclusions: Although tax-exempt status and increased community benefits spending were associated with increased social care services provision, the observation that certain hospital characteristics and state minimum community benefits spending requirements were associated with fewer social care services suggests opportunities for policy reform to increase social care services implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医院提供的社会关怀服务。
政策要点 医院通过提供社会护理服务来满足人口健康需求和病人的社会健康决定因素。免税医院必须投资于社区福利,包括社会医疗服务计划,尽管大多数社区福利支出都用于无偿医疗服务。免税医院提供的社会医疗服务比营利性医院多出约 36%。在免税医院中,那些将更多资源用于社区福利支出的医院提供更多类型的社会医疗服务,但那些位于有最低社区福利支出要求的州的医院提供的社会医疗服务较少。政策制定者可以考虑专门激励社区福利支出用于特定的社会医疗服务,包括将免税与实施、使用和结果目标挂钩,以更直接地帮助患者:尽管人们对识别病人的社会需求越来越感兴趣,但对医院为满足这些需求而提供的服务却知之甚少。我们确定了美国医院提供的社会关怀服务,并确定医院支出或各州的社区福利政策是否与免税医院提供这些服务有关:我们从美国医院协会年度调查(American Hospital Association Annual Survey)中收集了有关医院的国家二级数据,并从 CommunityBenefitInsight.org 收集了美国国税局(IRS)990 表格中有关社区福利支出的额外数据,从 HilltopInstitute.org 收集了州一级的社区福利政策。我们计算了社会医疗服务类型和医院特征的描述性统计数字,并对营利性医院和免税医院进行了双变量卡方检验和 t 检验。多变量泊松回归用于估计医院特征与所提供服务类型之间的关联,免税医院则用于估计社会护理服务与社区福利支出和政策之间的关联。多变量逻辑回归模拟了社区福利支出/政策与各类社会医疗服务之间的关联:2018年,美国私立医院平均提供了5.7种社会医疗服务。免税医院提供的社会医疗服务比营利性医院多出约 36%。床位数较多、隶属于医疗系统和拥有社区合作关系与提供更多社会医疗服务有关,而农村医院和根据合同管理的医院提供的社会医疗服务较少。在免税医院中,社区福利支出越多,提供的总社会关怀服务就越多(发生率比 [IRR] = 1.10,P < 0.01),以患者为中心的社会关怀服务也越多(发生率比 = 1.16,P < 0.01)。在有最低社区福利支出要求的州,医院提供的社会医疗服务要少得多:结论:虽然免税地位和社区福利支出的增加与社会医疗服务的增加有关,但观察到某些医院特征和州的最低社区福利支出要求与社会医疗服务的减少有关,这表明有机会进行政策改革以增加社会医疗服务的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
期刊最新文献
Innovative Insurance to Improve US Patient Access to Cell and Gene Therapy. How Are You Doing… Really? A Review of Whole Person Health Assessments. Mental Health Treatment Access: Experience, Hypotheticals, and Public Opinion. Comprehensiveness in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Reforming Physician Licensure in the United States to Improve Access to Telehealth: State, Regional, and Federal Initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1