Application of the Childbirth Supporter Study to Advance the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1177/19375867231177304
J Davis Harte, Athena Sheehan, Susan Stewart, Maralyn Foureur
{"title":"Application of the Childbirth Supporter Study to Advance the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool.","authors":"J Davis Harte, Athena Sheehan, Susan Stewart, Maralyn Foureur","doi":"10.1177/19375867231177304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Translational research to advance design criteria and apply the Childbirth Supporter Study (CSS) findings to practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The physical design of birth environments has not undergone substantial improvements in layout or ambiance since the initial move to hospitals. Cooperative, continuously present childbirth supporters are beneficial and are an expectation for most modern birth practices, yet the built environment does not offer support for the supporter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To advance design criteria, we use a comparative case study approach to create translational findings. Specifically, CSS findings were used as indicators to advance the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool (BUDSET) design characteristics in pursuit of better support for childbirth supporters in the built hospital birth environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This comparative case study provides eight new BUDSET design domain suggestions to benefit the supporter-woman dyad, and subsequently the baby and care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research-informed design imperatives are needed to guide the inclusion of childbirth supporters as both a supporter and as an individual in the birth space. Increased understanding of relationships between specific design features and childbirth supporters' experiences and reactions are provided. Suggestions to enhance the applicability of the BUDSET for birth unit design facility development are made, specifically ones that will better accommodate childbirth supporters.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231177304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Translational research to advance design criteria and apply the Childbirth Supporter Study (CSS) findings to practice.

Background: The physical design of birth environments has not undergone substantial improvements in layout or ambiance since the initial move to hospitals. Cooperative, continuously present childbirth supporters are beneficial and are an expectation for most modern birth practices, yet the built environment does not offer support for the supporter.

Methods: To advance design criteria, we use a comparative case study approach to create translational findings. Specifically, CSS findings were used as indicators to advance the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool (BUDSET) design characteristics in pursuit of better support for childbirth supporters in the built hospital birth environment.

Results: This comparative case study provides eight new BUDSET design domain suggestions to benefit the supporter-woman dyad, and subsequently the baby and care providers.

Conclusions: Research-informed design imperatives are needed to guide the inclusion of childbirth supporters as both a supporter and as an individual in the birth space. Increased understanding of relationships between specific design features and childbirth supporters' experiences and reactions are provided. Suggestions to enhance the applicability of the BUDSET for birth unit design facility development are made, specifically ones that will better accommodate childbirth supporters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用 "分娩支持者研究 "推进 "分娩室设计空间评估工具"。
目标:开展转化研究,推进设计标准,并将分娩支持者研究(CSS)结果应用于实践:背景:开展转化研究,推进设计标准,并将 "分娩支持者研究"(CSS)结果应用于实践:背景:自最初搬迁到医院以来,分娩环境的物理设计在布局或氛围方面一直没有实质性的改进。合作的、持续存在的分娩支持者是有益的,也是大多数现代分娩实践的期望,但建筑环境并没有为支持者提供支持:为了推进设计标准,我们采用了比较案例研究的方法来创造转化结果。具体来说,我们将 CSS 研究结果作为指标,以促进出生单元设计空间评估工具(BUDSET)设计特征的发展,从而在医院分娩环境中为分娩支持者提供更好的支持:结果:这项比较案例研究提供了八项新的 BUDSET 设计领域建议,使支持者-妇女二人组以及婴儿和护理人员从中受益:结论:需要以研究为基础的设计要领来指导分娩支持者作为支持者和个体融入分娩空间。结论:需要以研究为基础的设计要领来指导将分娩支持者作为支持者和个体纳入分娩空间,并加深对特定设计特征与分娩支持者的体验和反应之间关系的理解。为提高 BUDSET 在分娩室设计设施开发中的适用性提出了建议,特别是能更好地接纳分娩支持者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Design of a Cancer Infusion Center: Results from a Pre- and Post-Occupancy Evaluation. Perspectives of Families and Healthcare Staff on the Design of Inpatient Hospital Rooms in Saudi Arabia. Blue Space: Extracting the Sensory Characteristics of Waterscapes as a Potential Tool for Anxiety Mitigation Emergency Department Environmental Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study Harmony in Nature: Exploring the Multisensory Impact of Classical Gardens on Individuals' Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1