Influenza presentations and use of neuraminidase inhibitors by Australian general practice registrars: a cross-sectional analysis from the ReCEnT study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2022-002107
Chris Moller, Mieke van Driel, Andrew Davey, Amanda Tapley, Elizabeth G Holliday, Alison Fielding, Joshua Davis, Jean Ball, Anna Ralston, Alexandria Turner, Katie Mulquiney, Neil Spike, Kristen Fitzgerald, Parker Magin
{"title":"Influenza presentations and use of neuraminidase inhibitors by Australian general practice registrars: a cross-sectional analysis from the ReCEnT study.","authors":"Chris Moller, Mieke van Driel, Andrew Davey, Amanda Tapley, Elizabeth G Holliday, Alison Fielding, Joshua Davis, Jean Ball, Anna Ralston, Alexandria Turner, Katie Mulquiney, Neil Spike, Kristen Fitzgerald, Parker Magin","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-002107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to establish prevalence and associations of (1) influenza and influenza-like illness (IILI) presentations to Australian general practice (GP) registrars (trainees) and (2) the use of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) by GP registrars for new presentations of IILI, for the 10 years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia (2010-2019).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training ongoing inception cohort study of the in-consultation experience and clinical behaviours of GP registrars. Data are collected by individual registrars three times (from 60 consecutive consultations each time) at 6 monthly intervals. Data include diagnoses/problems managed and medicines prescribed, along with multiple other variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to establish associations of registrars seeing patients with IILI and of prescribing NAIs for IILI.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching practices within the Australian general practitioner specialist vocational training programme. Practices were located in five of the six Australian states (plus one territory).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>GP registrars in each of their three compulsory 6-month GP training terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010 to 2019, 0.2% of diagnoses/problems seen by registrars were IILI. 15.4% of new IILI presentations were prescribed an NAI. IILI diagnoses were less likely in younger (0-14) and older (65+) age groups, and more likely in an area of higher socioeconomic advantage. There was considerable variation in NAI prescribing between regions. There was no significant association of prescribing NAIs with age or Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IILI presentations were more likely among working-age adults and not among those groups at higher risk. Similarly, high-risk patient groups who would benefit most were not more likely to receive NAIs. The epidemiology and management of IILI has been distorted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the burden of influenza in vulnerable populations must not be overlooked. Appropriately targeted antiviral therapy with NAIs influences outcomes for vulnerable patients. General practitioners manage the majority of IILI in Australia, and understanding GP IILI presentation and NAI prescribing patterns is a key first step to enabling sound and rational prescribing decisions for better patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/4c/fmch-2022-002107.PMC10277129.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-002107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to establish prevalence and associations of (1) influenza and influenza-like illness (IILI) presentations to Australian general practice (GP) registrars (trainees) and (2) the use of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) by GP registrars for new presentations of IILI, for the 10 years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia (2010-2019).

Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training ongoing inception cohort study of the in-consultation experience and clinical behaviours of GP registrars. Data are collected by individual registrars three times (from 60 consecutive consultations each time) at 6 monthly intervals. Data include diagnoses/problems managed and medicines prescribed, along with multiple other variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to establish associations of registrars seeing patients with IILI and of prescribing NAIs for IILI.

Setting: Teaching practices within the Australian general practitioner specialist vocational training programme. Practices were located in five of the six Australian states (plus one territory).

Participants: GP registrars in each of their three compulsory 6-month GP training terms.

Results: From 2010 to 2019, 0.2% of diagnoses/problems seen by registrars were IILI. 15.4% of new IILI presentations were prescribed an NAI. IILI diagnoses were less likely in younger (0-14) and older (65+) age groups, and more likely in an area of higher socioeconomic advantage. There was considerable variation in NAI prescribing between regions. There was no significant association of prescribing NAIs with age or Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander patients.

Conclusions: IILI presentations were more likely among working-age adults and not among those groups at higher risk. Similarly, high-risk patient groups who would benefit most were not more likely to receive NAIs. The epidemiology and management of IILI has been distorted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the burden of influenza in vulnerable populations must not be overlooked. Appropriately targeted antiviral therapy with NAIs influences outcomes for vulnerable patients. General practitioners manage the majority of IILI in Australia, and understanding GP IILI presentation and NAI prescribing patterns is a key first step to enabling sound and rational prescribing decisions for better patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚全科注册医师的流感症状和神经氨酸酶抑制剂的使用情况:ReCEnT 研究的横断面分析。
研究目的本研究旨在确定:(1) 澳大利亚全科医生(GP)注册医师(受训者)的流感和流感样疾病(IILI)发病率和相关性;(2) COVID-19大流行前10年(2010-2019年)澳大利亚全科医生注册医师对新出现的IILI使用神经氨酸酶抑制剂(NAI)的情况:设计:这是对注册医师临床培训中遇到的问题进行的横断面分析,该研究是对全科医师注册医师的会诊经验和临床行为进行的持续性初始队列研究。数据由注册医师个人收集,每隔 6 个月收集 3 次(每次从 60 次连续会诊中收集)。数据包括诊断/问题处理、处方药物以及其他多个变量。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归法确定注册医师为 IILI 患者看病与为 IILI 开 NAI 处方之间的关联:环境:澳大利亚全科医生专科职业培训项目的教学实践。这些诊所位于澳大利亚六个州中的五个州(外加一个领地):结果:从 2010 年到 2019 年,0.2% 的澳大利亚全科医生在其三个为期 6 个月的全科医生必修培训期中的每一期都接受了培训:从 2010 年到 2019 年,注册医师接诊的诊断/问题中有 0.2% 是 IILI。15.4%的IILI新病例被开具了NAI处方。年轻(0-14 岁)和年长(65 岁以上)年龄组的 IILI 诊断率较低,社会经济优势较高的地区的 IILI 诊断率较高。不同地区的 NAI 处方差异很大。NAI处方与年龄或土著居民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民患者无明显关联:结论:在工作年龄段的成年人中更容易出现 IILI,而在高危人群中则不然。同样,受益最大的高风险患者群体接受非抗生素治疗的可能性也不大。COVID-19大流行扭曲了IFLI的流行病学和管理,但流感给弱势人群造成的负担不容忽视。使用非流感病毒药物进行有针对性的抗病毒治疗会影响易感患者的治疗效果。在澳大利亚,全科医生负责管理大多数IFLI患者,因此了解全科医生的IFLI表现和NAI处方模式是关键的第一步,只有这样才能做出正确合理的处方决定,改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
fRAP 2.0: a community engagement method applied to cervical cancer disparities among Hispanic women. Survey of international experts on research priorities to improve care for healthy ageing. Global lessons on delivery of primary healthcare services for people with non-communicable diseases: convergent mixed methods. Individual and geospatial factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a state-wide mixed-level analysis. Effectiveness of post-COVID-19 primary care attendance in improving survival in very old patients with multimorbidity: a territory-wide target trial emulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1