Century-Long Trends in the Financing and Ownership of American Health Care.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12647
Adam Gaffney, Steffie Woolhandler, David U Himmelstein
{"title":"Century-Long Trends in the Financing and Ownership of American Health Care.","authors":"Adam Gaffney, Steffie Woolhandler, David U Himmelstein","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Over the past century, the tax-financed share of health care spending has risen from 9% in 1923 to 69% in 2020; a large part of this tax financing is now the subsidization of private health insurance. For-profit ownership of health care facilities has also increased in recent decades and now predominates for many health subsectors. A rising share of physicians are now employees. US health care is, increasingly, publicly financed yet investor owned, a trend that has been accompanied by rising medical costs and, in recent years, stagnating or even worsening population health. A reconsideration of US health care financing and ownership appears warranted.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Who pays for health care-and who owns it-determine what care is delivered, who receives it, and who profits from it. We examined trends in health care ownership and financing over a century.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used multiple historical and current data sources (including data from the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association, government publications and surveys, and analyses of Medicare Provider of Services files) to classify health care provider ownership as: public, private (for-profit), and private (not-for-profit). We used US Census data to classify physicians' employers as public, not-for-profit, or for-profit entities or \"self-employed.\" We combined estimates from the official National Health Expenditures Accounts with other data sources to determine the public vs. private share of health care spending since 1923; we calculated a \"comprehensive\" public share metric that accounted for public subsidization of private health expenditures, mostly via the tax exemption for employer-sponsored insurance plans or government purchase of such plans for public employees.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>For-profit ownership of most health care subsectors has risen in recent decades and now predominates in several (including nursing facilities, ambulatory surgical facilities, dialysis facilities, hospices, and home health agencies). However, most community hospitals remain not-for-profit. Additionally, over the past century, a growing share of physicians identify as employees. Meanwhile, the comprehensive taxpayer-financed share of health care spending has increased dramatically from 9% in 1923 to 69% in 2020, with taxpayer-financed subsidies to private expenditures accounting for much of the recent growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>American health care is increasingly publicly financed yet investor owned, a trend accompanied by rising costs and, recently, worsening population health. A reassessment of the US mode of health care financing and ownership appears warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":"101 2","pages":"325-348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy Points Over the past century, the tax-financed share of health care spending has risen from 9% in 1923 to 69% in 2020; a large part of this tax financing is now the subsidization of private health insurance. For-profit ownership of health care facilities has also increased in recent decades and now predominates for many health subsectors. A rising share of physicians are now employees. US health care is, increasingly, publicly financed yet investor owned, a trend that has been accompanied by rising medical costs and, in recent years, stagnating or even worsening population health. A reconsideration of US health care financing and ownership appears warranted.

Context: Who pays for health care-and who owns it-determine what care is delivered, who receives it, and who profits from it. We examined trends in health care ownership and financing over a century.

Methods: We used multiple historical and current data sources (including data from the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association, government publications and surveys, and analyses of Medicare Provider of Services files) to classify health care provider ownership as: public, private (for-profit), and private (not-for-profit). We used US Census data to classify physicians' employers as public, not-for-profit, or for-profit entities or "self-employed." We combined estimates from the official National Health Expenditures Accounts with other data sources to determine the public vs. private share of health care spending since 1923; we calculated a "comprehensive" public share metric that accounted for public subsidization of private health expenditures, mostly via the tax exemption for employer-sponsored insurance plans or government purchase of such plans for public employees.

Findings: For-profit ownership of most health care subsectors has risen in recent decades and now predominates in several (including nursing facilities, ambulatory surgical facilities, dialysis facilities, hospices, and home health agencies). However, most community hospitals remain not-for-profit. Additionally, over the past century, a growing share of physicians identify as employees. Meanwhile, the comprehensive taxpayer-financed share of health care spending has increased dramatically from 9% in 1923 to 69% in 2020, with taxpayer-financed subsidies to private expenditures accounting for much of the recent growth.

Conclusions: American health care is increasingly publicly financed yet investor owned, a trend accompanied by rising costs and, recently, worsening population health. A reassessment of the US mode of health care financing and ownership appears warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医疗保健的融资和所有权的百年趋势》(Century-Long Trends in the Financing and Ownership of American Health Care)。
政策要点 在过去的一个世纪里,税收资助在医疗支出中所占的比例从 1923 年的 9% 上升到 2020 年的 69%;其中很大一部分税收资助是对私人医疗保险的补贴。近几十年来,医疗机构的营利性所有权也在增加,目前在许多医疗子行业中占主导地位。现在,越来越多的医生是雇员。美国的医疗保健越来越多地由公共财政和投资者共同拥有,这一趋势伴随着医疗成本的上升,以及近年来人口健康状况的停滞甚至恶化。看来有必要重新考虑美国的医疗融资和所有权问题:谁支付医疗费用--谁拥有医疗所有权--决定了医疗服务的内容、接受医疗服务的人、以及从中获利的人。我们研究了一个世纪以来医疗所有权和融资的趋势:我们利用多种历史和当前数据来源(包括来自美国医学协会、美国医院协会、政府出版物和调查的数据,以及对医疗保险服务提供者档案的分析),将医疗服务提供者所有权分为:公共、私营(营利性)和私营(非营利性)。我们使用美国人口普查数据将医生的雇主分为公共、非营利、营利实体或 "自雇"。我们将官方的 "全国医疗支出账户 "与其他数据来源的估算结合起来,以确定自 1923 年以来公共与私人在医疗支出中所占的份额;我们计算了一个 "综合 "公共份额指标,该指标考虑了公共对私人医疗支出的补贴,主要是通过对雇主赞助的保险计划免税或政府为公职人员购买此类计划:近几十年来,大多数医疗保健子行业的营利性所有权都有所上升,目前在一些子行业(包括护理机构、非住院手术机构、透析机构、临终关怀机构和家庭保健机构)中占主导地位。然而,大多数社区医院仍然是非营利性的。此外,在过去的一个世纪中,越来越多的医生将自己视为雇员。与此同时,纳税人资助的医疗支出占医疗支出的综合比例从 1923 年的 9% 大幅增至 2020 年的 69%,纳税人资助的私人支出补贴占近期增长的大部分:美国的医疗保健越来越多地由公共财政提供资金,但却由投资者拥有,这一趋势伴随着成本的上升,以及最近人口健康状况的恶化。看来有必要重新评估美国的医疗融资和所有权模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
期刊最新文献
When the Bough Breaks: The Financial Burden of Childbirth and Postpartum Care by Insurance Type. Launching Financial Incentives for Physician Groups to Improve Equity of Care by Patient Race and Ethnicity. Population Health Implications of Medicaid Prerelease and Transition Services for Incarcerated Populations. Overcoming the Impact of Students for Fair Admission v Harvard to Build a More Representative Health Care Workforce: Perspectives from Ending Unequal Treatment. A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Implementation of Policies That Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1