The Telehealth Tradeoff: A Multimethod Study of the Benefits and Challenges Associated With Maintaining Treatment Outcomes Using a Hybrid Model of Pediatric Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001120
Samantha P Bento, Catherine Stewart, Caitlin Conroy, Allison Smith, Leah Reece, Kelsey Jervis, Yasmin Cole-Lewis, Deirdre Logan, Edin T Randall
{"title":"The Telehealth Tradeoff: A Multimethod Study of the Benefits and Challenges Associated With Maintaining Treatment Outcomes Using a Hybrid Model of Pediatric Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment.","authors":"Samantha P Bento,&nbsp;Catherine Stewart,&nbsp;Caitlin Conroy,&nbsp;Allison Smith,&nbsp;Leah Reece,&nbsp;Kelsey Jervis,&nbsp;Yasmin Cole-Lewis,&nbsp;Deirdre Logan,&nbsp;Edin T Randall","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic required intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) programs to shift to virtual models of care. This study used a multimethod approach to examine outcomes of a pediatric hybrid IIPT program (50% in-person treatment and 50% synchronous video-based telehealth) and assessed staff experiences while treating within this model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (M=14.73, SD=2.04; 79% female) reported pain intensity, functional disability, and psychological factors (anxiety, depressive symptoms, fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, social functioning) at admission, discharge, and short-term follow-up. Differences in treatment outcomes at discharge and short-term follow-up between patients who participated in the hybrid IIPT model (n=42) during the pandemic and those who participated in the traditional in-person model before the pandemic (n=42) were examined. Quantitative assessments of staff burnout and perceived effort and qualitative assessments exploring staff perspectives about the challenges and advantages of the hybrid IIPT model were gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth in both groups made significant improvements across the majority of treatment outcomes; however, the hybrid group reported higher levels of pain at discharge and anxiety at follow-up. The majority of IIPT staff reported moderate to high levels of overall burnout, and almost half reported high levels of emotional exhaustion. Staff highlighted various challenges and benefits associated with treating within the hybrid model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When considering telehealth as a treatment tool for youth with complex chronic pain, it is crucial to leverage its benefits while addressing its challenges for patients and providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"39 7","pages":"307-318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic required intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) programs to shift to virtual models of care. This study used a multimethod approach to examine outcomes of a pediatric hybrid IIPT program (50% in-person treatment and 50% synchronous video-based telehealth) and assessed staff experiences while treating within this model.

Materials and methods: Patients (M=14.73, SD=2.04; 79% female) reported pain intensity, functional disability, and psychological factors (anxiety, depressive symptoms, fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, social functioning) at admission, discharge, and short-term follow-up. Differences in treatment outcomes at discharge and short-term follow-up between patients who participated in the hybrid IIPT model (n=42) during the pandemic and those who participated in the traditional in-person model before the pandemic (n=42) were examined. Quantitative assessments of staff burnout and perceived effort and qualitative assessments exploring staff perspectives about the challenges and advantages of the hybrid IIPT model were gathered.

Results: Youth in both groups made significant improvements across the majority of treatment outcomes; however, the hybrid group reported higher levels of pain at discharge and anxiety at follow-up. The majority of IIPT staff reported moderate to high levels of overall burnout, and almost half reported high levels of emotional exhaustion. Staff highlighted various challenges and benefits associated with treating within the hybrid model.

Discussion: When considering telehealth as a treatment tool for youth with complex chronic pain, it is crucial to leverage its benefits while addressing its challenges for patients and providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗的权衡:使用儿科强化跨学科疼痛治疗混合模型维持治疗结果的益处和挑战的多方法研究。
目的:COVID-19大流行需要密集的跨学科疼痛治疗(ipt)项目向虚拟护理模式转变。本研究采用多方法方法检查儿科混合ipt项目(50%面对面治疗和50%基于同步视频的远程医疗)的结果,并评估在该模式下治疗的工作人员经验。材料与方法:患者(M=14.73, SD=2.04;(79%女性)在入院、出院和短期随访时报告了疼痛强度、功能残疾和心理因素(焦虑、抑郁症状、疼痛恐惧、疼痛灾难化、社会功能)。研究了大流行期间参加混合ipt模型的患者(n=42)与大流行前参加传统面对面模型的患者(n=42)在出院时治疗结果和短期随访方面的差异。收集了员工倦怠和感知努力的定量评估和定性评估,探讨了员工对混合ipt模式的挑战和优势的看法。结果:两组青少年在大多数治疗结果上都有显著改善;然而,混合组在出院时的疼痛程度和随访时的焦虑程度更高。大多数ipt员工报告了中度到高度的整体倦怠,几乎一半的人报告了高度的情绪衰竭。工作人员强调了在混合模式下治疗的各种挑战和好处。讨论:在考虑将远程医疗作为青年复杂慢性疼痛的治疗工具时,利用其好处,同时解决其对患者和提供者的挑战至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Pain Self-Efficacy as a Moderator and Modifiable Factor for Health-Related Quality of Life in Preoperative Setting. Diagnostic Criteria for Centralized Pain Following Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review. Letter to the Editor regarding "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)". Longitudinal Outcomes for a 10-Week Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program. Mid-Life Social and Health Outcomes Associated With Early-Onset Chronic Noncancer Pain: Findings from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1