Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine International Journal of Trichology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-19 DOI:10.4103/ijt.ijt_5_22
Dharm Mansukh Sondagar, Hita H Mehta, Rashmiben Sabbirali Agharia, Milan K Jhavar
{"title":"Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia - A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Dharm Mansukh Sondagar,&nbsp;Hita H Mehta,&nbsp;Rashmiben Sabbirali Agharia,&nbsp;Milan K Jhavar","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_5_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is caused by the susceptibility of hair follicles to androgenic miniaturization, which leads to hair loss. The most common modalities for the treatment of AGA include the use of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a newer modality of treatment for AGA. We tried to evaluate the added benefit of LLLT in AGA compared with topical minoxidil 5% alone.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of LLLT combined with topical 5% minoxidil in AGA versus topical 5% minoxidil used alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After ethics committee approval, 54 patients of AGA were randomly divided into two groups. Group A participants received LLLT therapy twice a week plus topical 5% minoxidil and Group B participants received only minoxidil 5% solution. Both the groups were followed up for 16 weeks and evaluated with gross photographs, TrichoScan analysis, and dermoscopy to look for any improvement in hair density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 16 weeks, improvement in hair density of 14.78% ± 10.93% in Group A was recorded compared to 11.43% ± 6.43% in Group B. However, while comparing both means, <i>P</i> value was 0.45 which was not significant. The physician global assessment and patient satisfaction score revealed no significant difference between both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although LLLT appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of male pattern hair loss, we did not observe any significant difference in terms of improvement in hair density between both the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"15 1","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10251294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_5_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is caused by the susceptibility of hair follicles to androgenic miniaturization, which leads to hair loss. The most common modalities for the treatment of AGA include the use of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a newer modality of treatment for AGA. We tried to evaluate the added benefit of LLLT in AGA compared with topical minoxidil 5% alone.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of LLLT combined with topical 5% minoxidil in AGA versus topical 5% minoxidil used alone.

Materials and methods: After ethics committee approval, 54 patients of AGA were randomly divided into two groups. Group A participants received LLLT therapy twice a week plus topical 5% minoxidil and Group B participants received only minoxidil 5% solution. Both the groups were followed up for 16 weeks and evaluated with gross photographs, TrichoScan analysis, and dermoscopy to look for any improvement in hair density.

Results: After 16 weeks, improvement in hair density of 14.78% ± 10.93% in Group A was recorded compared to 11.43% ± 6.43% in Group B. However, while comparing both means, P value was 0.45 which was not significant. The physician global assessment and patient satisfaction score revealed no significant difference between both the groups.

Conclusion: Although LLLT appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of male pattern hair loss, we did not observe any significant difference in terms of improvement in hair density between both the groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低水平激光治疗雄激素性脱发的疗效——一项随机对照试验。
背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)是由于毛囊易发生雄激素小型化而导致脱发。AGA最常见的治疗方式包括局部使用米诺地尔和口服非那雄胺。低水平激光治疗(LLLT)是AGA的一种新的治疗方式。我们试图评估LLLT在AGA中与单独使用5%米诺地尔相比的额外益处。目的:本研究的目的是比较LLLT联合局部5%米诺地尔治疗AGA与单独局部5%米诺地尔的疗效。材料和方法:经伦理委员会批准,将54例AGA患者随机分为两组。A组参与者接受LLLT治疗,每周两次,外加局部5%米诺地尔,B组参与者仅接受米诺地尔5%溶液。这两组患者都接受了16周的随访,并通过大体照片、毛发扫描分析和皮肤镜检查进行评估,以寻找头发密度的任何改善。结果:16周后,A组的头发密度改善了14.78%±10.93%,而B组为11.43%±6.43%。然而,在比较两种平均值时,P值为0.45,这并不显著。医生的总体评估和患者满意度评分显示,两组之间没有显著差异。结论:尽管LLLT治疗男性型脱发是安全有效的,但我们没有观察到两组在改善头发密度方面有任何显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Cross-sectional Observational Study to Correlate the Trichoscopic Findings of Female Pattern Hair Loss with the Disease Severity and Underlying Histopathological Changes. A Study of Serum Ferritin and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels in Male Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia. Alopecia Areata with Renal Dysgenesis. Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur Syndrome with Mucosal Involvement: A Rare Case. Mucinous Lupus Alopecia with Papulonodular Mucinosis as a Sole Cutaneous Manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1