Cochlear implantation through intracochlear fibrosis: A comparison of surgical techniques.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2022.2153968
Anne K Maxwell, Jacob B Kahane, Rahul Mehta, Moises A Arriaga
{"title":"Cochlear implantation through intracochlear fibrosis: A comparison of surgical techniques.","authors":"Anne K Maxwell,&nbsp;Jacob B Kahane,&nbsp;Rahul Mehta,&nbsp;Moises A Arriaga","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2153968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the implications of ossification on cochlear implantation (CI) have been extensively described, there is a paucity of data regarding the fibrotic stage. We examined the outcomes of different insertion techniques for managing intracochlear fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of case series with case-control comparison.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based tertiary-referral otology-neurotology practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Between 2009 to 2020, 384 patients underwent CI. Of those, 7 patients (8 ears) demonstrated intracochlear fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI performed 1-4 months following meningitis/labyrinthitis and 12-24 months after idiopathic sudden SNHL. Fibrosis removal (38%) or dilation (63%) permitted implantation. A styleted-electrode was used in 63% due to dense fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative audiometry with CI in place, additional comparisons with audiometric outcomes in age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full insertion achieved in all except one ear with partial ossification. Mean ipsilateral pure tone average (PTA) improved to 29 ± 15 dB and speech discrimination to 72 ± 28%. Fibrosis removal vs. dilation resulted in no PTA differences (<i>p</i> = 0.76). Poorest outcomes occurred with the longest time to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Good CI audiologic outcomes in the setting of cochlear fibrosis can be achieved and are independent of technique. Instead, they vary with time to implantation. Every attempt should be made to intervene as early as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 2","pages":"73-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2153968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: While the implications of ossification on cochlear implantation (CI) have been extensively described, there is a paucity of data regarding the fibrotic stage. We examined the outcomes of different insertion techniques for managing intracochlear fibrosis.

Study design: Retrospective review of case series with case-control comparison.

Setting: University-based tertiary-referral otology-neurotology practice.

Patients: Between 2009 to 2020, 384 patients underwent CI. Of those, 7 patients (8 ears) demonstrated intracochlear fibrosis.

Interventions: CI performed 1-4 months following meningitis/labyrinthitis and 12-24 months after idiopathic sudden SNHL. Fibrosis removal (38%) or dilation (63%) permitted implantation. A styleted-electrode was used in 63% due to dense fibrosis.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative audiometry with CI in place, additional comparisons with audiometric outcomes in age-matched controls.

Results: Full insertion achieved in all except one ear with partial ossification. Mean ipsilateral pure tone average (PTA) improved to 29 ± 15 dB and speech discrimination to 72 ± 28%. Fibrosis removal vs. dilation resulted in no PTA differences (p = 0.76). Poorest outcomes occurred with the longest time to surgery.

Conclusions: Good CI audiologic outcomes in the setting of cochlear fibrosis can be achieved and are independent of technique. Instead, they vary with time to implantation. Every attempt should be made to intervene as early as possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳蜗内纤维化人工耳蜗植入术:手术技术的比较。
目的:虽然骨化对人工耳蜗植入(CI)的影响已被广泛描述,但关于纤维化阶段的数据缺乏。我们检查了不同插入技术治疗耳蜗内纤维化的结果。研究设计:对病例系列进行回顾性研究,并进行病例-对照比较。背景:以大学为基础的三级转诊耳科-神经科实践。患者:2009年至2020年间,384例患者接受了CI。其中7例(8耳)表现为耳蜗内纤维化。干预措施:CI在脑膜炎/迷路炎后1-4个月和特发性突发性SNHL后12-24个月进行。纤维化去除(38%)或扩张(63%)允许植入。由于致密纤维化,63%的患者使用了固定电极。主要结果测量:术后CI听力学,与年龄匹配对照组的听力学结果进行比较。结果:除1耳部分骨化外,其余均成功植入。平均同侧纯音平均值(PTA)提高到29±15 dB,语音识别率提高到72±28%。纤维化切除与扩张无PTA差异(p = 0.76)。手术时间越长,预后越差。结论:在耳蜗纤维化的情况下,良好的CI听力学结果是可以实现的,并且与技术无关。相反,它们随着时间的推移而变化。应尽一切努力尽早进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
Audiological profile in children with congenital inner ear anomalies. The effect of current amplitude and multi-electrode stimulation on eSRT for auditory fitting in cochlear implants with pulse-width loudness coding. The relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels revisited. Translation and validation of the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) questionnaire for preschool children in Dutch. Cochlear reimplantation rate, causes, and outcomes: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1