The relationship between required physician letters of recommendation and decreasing diversity in osteopathic medical school admissions.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1515/jom-2022-0112
Justin Fox, John Burgess, Alexis M Stoner, Harold Garner, Heather Bendyk
{"title":"The relationship between required physician letters of recommendation and decreasing diversity in osteopathic medical school admissions.","authors":"Justin Fox,&nbsp;John Burgess,&nbsp;Alexis M Stoner,&nbsp;Harold Garner,&nbsp;Heather Bendyk","doi":"10.1515/jom-2022-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Some racial and ethnic groups are underrepresented in the medical field because they face unique barriers to admission to medical school. One admission requirement that can present a barrier for applicants is the physician letter of recommendation (PLOR). Undergraduate students report confusion with the application process and lack of mentorship to be two of their biggest challenges to becoming a doctor. It is especially challenging to those who already have limited access to practicing physicians. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the presence of a PLOR requirement, the diversity of students who apply and matriculate into medical school will be decreased.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine if a relationship exists between a PLOR requirement for the medical school application and the proportion of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students applying and matriculating to that school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted utilizing data published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Application Services (AACOMAS) on the race and ethnicity of applicants and matriculants to osteopathic medical schools during the years 2009-2019. In total, 35 osteopathic schools with 44 campuses were included in the study. Schools were grouped based on whether they required a PLOR. For each group of schools, descriptive statistics were performed for the following variables: number of total applicants, class size, application rate per ethnicity, matriculation rate per ethnicity, number of applicants per ethnicity, number of matriculants per ethnicity, and percentage of student body per ethnicity. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to detect differences between the two groups. Statistical significance was assessed at the α=0.05 level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Schools that required a PLOR showed decreases in the number of applicants across all races and ethnicities. Black students showed the greatest difference between groups and were the only ethnicity to show significant reductions across all outcomes in the presence of a PLOR requirement. On average, schools that required a PLOR have 37.3% (185 vs. 295; p<0.0001) fewer Black applicants and 51.2% (4 vs. 8.2; p<0.0001) fewer Black matriculants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study strongly suggests a relationship between requiring a PLOR's and decreasing racial and ethnic diversity in medical school matriculants, specifically the Black applicants. Based on this result, it is recommended that the requirement of a PLOR be discontinued for osteopathic medical schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2022-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Some racial and ethnic groups are underrepresented in the medical field because they face unique barriers to admission to medical school. One admission requirement that can present a barrier for applicants is the physician letter of recommendation (PLOR). Undergraduate students report confusion with the application process and lack of mentorship to be two of their biggest challenges to becoming a doctor. It is especially challenging to those who already have limited access to practicing physicians. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the presence of a PLOR requirement, the diversity of students who apply and matriculate into medical school will be decreased.

Objectives: This study aims to determine if a relationship exists between a PLOR requirement for the medical school application and the proportion of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students applying and matriculating to that school.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted utilizing data published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Application Services (AACOMAS) on the race and ethnicity of applicants and matriculants to osteopathic medical schools during the years 2009-2019. In total, 35 osteopathic schools with 44 campuses were included in the study. Schools were grouped based on whether they required a PLOR. For each group of schools, descriptive statistics were performed for the following variables: number of total applicants, class size, application rate per ethnicity, matriculation rate per ethnicity, number of applicants per ethnicity, number of matriculants per ethnicity, and percentage of student body per ethnicity. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to detect differences between the two groups. Statistical significance was assessed at the α=0.05 level.

Results: Schools that required a PLOR showed decreases in the number of applicants across all races and ethnicities. Black students showed the greatest difference between groups and were the only ethnicity to show significant reductions across all outcomes in the presence of a PLOR requirement. On average, schools that required a PLOR have 37.3% (185 vs. 295; p<0.0001) fewer Black applicants and 51.2% (4 vs. 8.2; p<0.0001) fewer Black matriculants.

Conclusions: This study strongly suggests a relationship between requiring a PLOR's and decreasing racial and ethnic diversity in medical school matriculants, specifically the Black applicants. Based on this result, it is recommended that the requirement of a PLOR be discontinued for osteopathic medical schools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要求医师推荐信与骨科医学院招生多样性下降之间的关系。
背景:一些种族和族裔群体在医学领域的代表性不足,因为他们在进入医学院时面临独特的障碍。一个可能给申请人带来障碍的入学要求是医生推荐信(PLOR)。本科生表示,申请过程中的困惑和缺乏指导是他们成为医生的两大挑战。对于那些已经有机会接触执业医生的人来说,这尤其具有挑战性。因此,我们假设在存在PLOR要求的情况下,申请和进入医学院的学生的多样性将会降低。目的:本研究旨在确定医学院申请的PLOR要求与申请和录取该学校的医学代表性不足(URM)学生比例之间是否存在关系。方法:利用美国骨科医学应用服务学院协会(AACOMAS)公布的数据,对2009-2019年骨科医学院申请者和毕业生的种族和民族进行回顾性研究。共有35所骨科学校44个校区参与了这项研究。学校根据是否需要PLOR进行分组。对于每一组学校,对以下变量进行了描述性统计:总申请人数、班级规模、每个种族的申请率、每个种族的入学率、每个种族的申请人数、每个种族的预科生人数和每个种族的学生总数百分比。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验检测两组间的差异。在α=0.05水平上评价差异有统计学意义。结果:要求PLOR的学校显示,所有种族和民族的申请人数量都在减少。黑人学生在组间表现出最大的差异,并且是唯一一个在PLOR要求下所有结果都显着降低的种族。平均而言,要求PLOR的学校占37.3%(185对295;结论:本研究强烈表明,要求PLOR与医学院新生,特别是黑人申请者的种族和民族多样性减少之间存在关系。基于这一结果,建议取消骨科医学院对PLOR的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings. Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion. Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey. The negative effects of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and implications for the presurgical examination. Reduction in deep organ-space infection in gynecologic oncology surgery with use of oral antibiotic bowel preparation: a retrospective cohort analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1