A Systematic Review of the Heterogeneity of Schema Therapy.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Personality Disorders Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.262
Silvia D M van Dijk, Martine S Veenstra, Rob H S van den Brink, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Richard C Oude Voshaar
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Heterogeneity of Schema Therapy.","authors":"Silvia D M van Dijk,&nbsp;Martine S Veenstra,&nbsp;Rob H S van den Brink,&nbsp;Sebastiaan P J van Alphen,&nbsp;Richard C Oude Voshaar","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to explore the heterogeneity of schema therapy regarding (a) patient characteristics, (b) content, and (c) way of delivering schema therapy. A search was conducted of the electronic databases EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and COCHRANE up to June 15, 2022. Treatment studies were eligible if they (a) used schema therapy as (component of) the intervention examined, and (b) reported an outcome measure quantitatively. A total of 101 studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 30), non-randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 8), pre-post designs (<i>n</i> = 22), cases series (<i>n</i> = 13), and case reports <i>(n</i> = 28), including 4006 patients. Good feasibility was consistently reported irrespective of format (group versus individual), setting (outpatient, day-treatment, inpatient), intensity of treatment, and the specific therapeutic components included. Schema therapy was applied to various (psychiatric) disorders. All studies presented promising results. Effectiveness of the different models of schema therapy as well as application beyond personality disorders should be examined more rigorously.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 2","pages":"233-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We aimed to explore the heterogeneity of schema therapy regarding (a) patient characteristics, (b) content, and (c) way of delivering schema therapy. A search was conducted of the electronic databases EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and COCHRANE up to June 15, 2022. Treatment studies were eligible if they (a) used schema therapy as (component of) the intervention examined, and (b) reported an outcome measure quantitatively. A total of 101 studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (n = 30), non-randomized controlled trials (n = 8), pre-post designs (n = 22), cases series (n = 13), and case reports (n = 28), including 4006 patients. Good feasibility was consistently reported irrespective of format (group versus individual), setting (outpatient, day-treatment, inpatient), intensity of treatment, and the specific therapeutic components included. Schema therapy was applied to various (psychiatric) disorders. All studies presented promising results. Effectiveness of the different models of schema therapy as well as application beyond personality disorders should be examined more rigorously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图式治疗异质性的系统回顾。
我们旨在探讨图式治疗在以下方面的异质性:(a)患者特征,(b)内容,以及(c)提供图式治疗的方式。检索截止到2022年6月15日的电子数据库EMBASE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、MEDLINE和COCHRANE。如果治疗研究(a)使用图式治疗作为所检查的干预措施的(组成部分),并且(b)定量地报告了结果测量,则治疗研究是合格的。101项研究符合纳入标准,包括随机对照试验(n = 30)、非随机对照试验(n = 8)、前后设计(n = 22)、病例系列(n = 13)和病例报告(n = 28),共纳入4006例患者。无论治疗形式(群体与个体)、治疗环境(门诊、日间治疗、住院)、治疗强度和具体治疗成分如何,均一致报告了良好的可行性。图式疗法应用于各种(精神)疾病。所有的研究都提出了令人鼓舞的结果。不同模式的图式治疗的有效性以及在人格障碍之外的应用应该得到更严格的检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Exploration of Help-Seeking and Experiences of Diagnosis Among Men With Borderline Personality Disorder. Alexithymia and Personality Pathology. Erratum. Increasing Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. The Role of Diagnostic Models in Prejudice Toward People With Borderline Personality Disorder: An Experimental Investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1