An assessment of compliance with optimal fluoride levels for oral health benefit by New Zealand drinking water suppliers

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of public health dentistry Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1111/jphd.12548
Tim Chambers PhD, Matt Hobbs PhD, Jonathan M. Broadbent BDS, PhD, PGDipComDent
{"title":"An assessment of compliance with optimal fluoride levels for oral health benefit by New Zealand drinking water suppliers","authors":"Tim Chambers PhD,&nbsp;Matt Hobbs PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Broadbent BDS, PhD, PGDipComDent","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Community water fluoridation (CWF) has proven oral health benefits. We investigated whether drinking water suppliers are meeting New Zealand CWF targets (0.7–1.0 ppm) to ensure these benefits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrieved fluoride testing data from 25 supplies serving 2,059,000 people (82% of people on a fluoridated supply), for the years 1992–2022 (22,220 weekly observations). We descriptively assessed compliance with fluoride targets in this convenience sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean fluoride level was 0.66 ppm (SD 0.28). Water suppliers achieved fluoride targets 54.1% of the time (range 4.2%–77.9%). Fluoride concentration fell short of the target in 42.2<b>%</b> of observations, exceeded but under the maximum acceptable value (MAV) in 3.6%, and in excess of the MAV in 0.1%. The percentage of compliant observations was greater in larger than smaller supplies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Noncompliance with CWF targets was common. Epidemiological studies that rely on fluoridation status as their exposure may underestimate the oral health benefits of CWF. Our results highlight future challenges with the feasibility of expanding CWF under new legislation as well as the weaknesses in drinking water surveillance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jphd.12548","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

Community water fluoridation (CWF) has proven oral health benefits. We investigated whether drinking water suppliers are meeting New Zealand CWF targets (0.7–1.0 ppm) to ensure these benefits.

Methods

We retrieved fluoride testing data from 25 supplies serving 2,059,000 people (82% of people on a fluoridated supply), for the years 1992–2022 (22,220 weekly observations). We descriptively assessed compliance with fluoride targets in this convenience sample.

Results

The mean fluoride level was 0.66 ppm (SD 0.28). Water suppliers achieved fluoride targets 54.1% of the time (range 4.2%–77.9%). Fluoride concentration fell short of the target in 42.2% of observations, exceeded but under the maximum acceptable value (MAV) in 3.6%, and in excess of the MAV in 0.1%. The percentage of compliant observations was greater in larger than smaller supplies.

Conclusions

Noncompliance with CWF targets was common. Epidemiological studies that rely on fluoridation status as their exposure may underestimate the oral health benefits of CWF. Our results highlight future challenges with the feasibility of expanding CWF under new legislation as well as the weaknesses in drinking water surveillance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新西兰饮用水供应商遵守口腔健康最佳氟化物水平的情况
目的社区水氟化(CWF)已被证明对口腔健康有益。我们调查了饮用水供应商是否达到新西兰CWF目标(0.7-1.0 ppm)以确保这些效益。方法:我们检索了1992-2022年(每周22,220次观察)期间为2,059,000人(82%的人使用氟化供应)提供的25个供应的氟化物检测数据。我们描述性地评估了这个方便样本对氟化物目标的依从性。结果平均氟含量为0.66 ppm (SD 0.28)。供水商在54.1%的时间内实现了氟化物目标(范围为4.2%-77.9%)。42.2%的监测值未达到目标,3.6%的监测值超过但低于最大可接受值(MAV), 0.1%的监测值超过最大可接受值。在较大的供应中,依从性观察的百分比大于较小的供应。结论不符合CWF指标是常见的。依赖于氟化状态的流行病学研究可能低估了CWF对口腔健康的益处。我们的研究结果突出了在新立法下扩大CWF可行性的未来挑战以及饮用水监测方面的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Associations between disability type and untreated dental decay among community dwelling US adults Issue Information Change in parental knowledge and beliefs about early childhood dental caries following a pragmatic community‐based trial Age of first dental visits: A benefit of the pediatric medical home Patient safety climate research in primary care dentistry: A systematic scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1