Perception of timbre in adult Cochlear implant users: Comparison of Iranian and Western musical instruments.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2022.2137909
Shayan Dasdar, Azam Nasresfahani, Nika Kianfar, Masoud Motesadi Zarandi, Farzad Mobedshahi, Sasan Dabiri, Ali Kouhi
{"title":"Perception of timbre in adult Cochlear implant users: Comparison of Iranian and Western musical instruments.","authors":"Shayan Dasdar,&nbsp;Azam Nasresfahani,&nbsp;Nika Kianfar,&nbsp;Masoud Motesadi Zarandi,&nbsp;Farzad Mobedshahi,&nbsp;Sasan Dabiri,&nbsp;Ali Kouhi","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2137909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants (CI) have dramatically improved speech perception for patients with sensorineural hearing impairment. However, listening to music is a great challenge for them. This study examined the perception and appraisal of Iranian musical instruments comparing with similar Western instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven adult CI users and 25 normal hearing (NH) individuals participated in this study. Musical stimuli of three commonly heard instrument pairs were prepared. Participants were asked to identify the instruments and rate their appraisal on a ten-point Likert scale (0 = dislike very much, 10 = like very much).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The instrument recognition rate was 40.6% among the CI users, and the mean appraisal score was 5.2 ± 2.7. NH listeners had none significant higher scores on both tasks with a recognition rate of 50.0% and the mean appraisal score of 6.9 ± 1.5. Iranian instruments were more recognized in both groups. Regarding their appraisal, the mean score for both types was almost equal in the NH group, while CI users more appraised Iranian instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to better recognition of Iranian instruments, they were particularly better appraised in the CI group. Iranian instruments provide suitable musical pieces for CI recipients that can be considered in rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2137909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cochlear implants (CI) have dramatically improved speech perception for patients with sensorineural hearing impairment. However, listening to music is a great challenge for them. This study examined the perception and appraisal of Iranian musical instruments comparing with similar Western instruments.

Methods: Eleven adult CI users and 25 normal hearing (NH) individuals participated in this study. Musical stimuli of three commonly heard instrument pairs were prepared. Participants were asked to identify the instruments and rate their appraisal on a ten-point Likert scale (0 = dislike very much, 10 = like very much).

Results: The instrument recognition rate was 40.6% among the CI users, and the mean appraisal score was 5.2 ± 2.7. NH listeners had none significant higher scores on both tasks with a recognition rate of 50.0% and the mean appraisal score of 6.9 ± 1.5. Iranian instruments were more recognized in both groups. Regarding their appraisal, the mean score for both types was almost equal in the NH group, while CI users more appraised Iranian instruments.

Conclusion: In addition to better recognition of Iranian instruments, they were particularly better appraised in the CI group. Iranian instruments provide suitable musical pieces for CI recipients that can be considered in rehabilitation programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年人工耳蜗使用者的音色感知:伊朗和西方乐器的比较。
目的:人工耳蜗(CI)显著改善了感音神经性听力障碍患者的语言感知能力。然而,听音乐对他们来说是一个巨大的挑战。本研究考察了伊朗乐器与类似西方乐器的感知和评价。方法:11名成年CI使用者和25名听力正常(NH)个体参与了本研究。准备了三组常用乐器对的音乐刺激。参与者被要求识别这些工具,并以10分的李克特量表(0 =非常不喜欢,10 =非常喜欢)对自己的评价进行评分。结果:CI使用者的器械识别率为40.6%,平均评价得分为5.2±2.7分。NH听者在两项任务上的得分均无显著提高,识别率为50.0%,平均评价得分为6.9±1.5分。伊朗乐器在两组中都得到了更多的认可。关于他们的评价,两种类型的平均得分在NH组几乎相等,而CI用户更多地评价伊朗仪器。结论:CI组除了对伊朗器械有更好的识别外,对伊朗器械的评价也更好。伊朗乐器为CI受者提供了合适的音乐作品,可以在康复计划中考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
Audiological profile in children with congenital inner ear anomalies. The effect of current amplitude and multi-electrode stimulation on eSRT for auditory fitting in cochlear implants with pulse-width loudness coding. The relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels revisited. Translation and validation of the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) questionnaire for preschool children in Dutch. Cochlear reimplantation rate, causes, and outcomes: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1