Ideological values are parametrically associated with empathy neural response to vicarious suffering.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Social cognitive and affective neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1093/scan/nsad029
Niloufar Zebarjadi, Eliyahu Adler, Annika Kluge, Mikko Sams, Jonathan Levy
{"title":"Ideological values are parametrically associated with empathy neural response to vicarious suffering.","authors":"Niloufar Zebarjadi,&nbsp;Eliyahu Adler,&nbsp;Annika Kluge,&nbsp;Mikko Sams,&nbsp;Jonathan Levy","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies in political psychology reported higher levels of empathy among political leftists (i.e. liberals) as compared to political rightists (i.e. conservatives). Yet, all those studies lean on self-reports, which are often limited by subjective bias and conformity to social norms. Here, we tested this putative asymmetry using neuroimaging: we recorded oscillatory neural activity using magnetoencephalography while 55 participants completed a well-validated neuroimaging paradigm for empathy to vicarious suffering. The findings revealed a typical rhythmic alpha-band 'empathy response' in the temporal-parietal junction. This neural empathy response was significantly stronger in the leftist than in the rightist group. In addition to this dichotomous division, the neural response was parametrically associated with both self-reported political inclination and right-wing ideological values. This is the first study to reveal an asymmetry in the neural empathy response as a function of political ideology. The findings reported in this study are in line with the current literature in political psychology and provide a novel neural perspective to support the ideological asymmetry in empathy. This study opens new vistas for addressing questions in political psychology by using neuroimaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":21789,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies in political psychology reported higher levels of empathy among political leftists (i.e. liberals) as compared to political rightists (i.e. conservatives). Yet, all those studies lean on self-reports, which are often limited by subjective bias and conformity to social norms. Here, we tested this putative asymmetry using neuroimaging: we recorded oscillatory neural activity using magnetoencephalography while 55 participants completed a well-validated neuroimaging paradigm for empathy to vicarious suffering. The findings revealed a typical rhythmic alpha-band 'empathy response' in the temporal-parietal junction. This neural empathy response was significantly stronger in the leftist than in the rightist group. In addition to this dichotomous division, the neural response was parametrically associated with both self-reported political inclination and right-wing ideological values. This is the first study to reveal an asymmetry in the neural empathy response as a function of political ideology. The findings reported in this study are in line with the current literature in political psychology and provide a novel neural perspective to support the ideological asymmetry in empathy. This study opens new vistas for addressing questions in political psychology by using neuroimaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识形态价值观与移情神经对替代痛苦的反应参数相关。
政治心理学的几项研究表明,政治左派(即自由派)比政治右派(即保守派)有更高的同理心水平。然而,所有这些研究都依赖于自我报告,而自我报告往往受到主观偏见和对社会规范的遵从的限制。在这里,我们使用神经成像来测试这种假定的不对称性:我们使用脑磁图记录振荡神经活动,同时55名参与者完成了一个经过验证的神经成像范式,用于对替代性痛苦的共情。研究结果显示,在颞-顶叶交界处有一种典型的有节奏的α带“共情反应”。这种神经共情反应在左派中明显强于右派。除了这种二分法之外,神经反应还与自我报告的政治倾向和右翼意识形态价值观参数化相关。这是第一个揭示神经共情反应作为政治意识形态函数的不对称性的研究。本研究结果与当前政治心理学文献一致,为共情的意识形态不对称提供了新的神经学视角。这项研究为利用神经成像技术解决政治心理学中的问题开辟了新的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SCAN will consider research that uses neuroimaging (fMRI, MRI, PET, EEG, MEG), neuropsychological patient studies, animal lesion studies, single-cell recording, pharmacological perturbation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. SCAN will also consider submissions that examine the mediational role of neural processes in linking social phenomena to physiological, neuroendocrine, immunological, developmental, and genetic processes. Additionally, SCAN will publish papers that address issues of mental and physical health as they relate to social and affective processes (e.g., autism, anxiety disorders, depression, stress, effects of child rearing) as long as cognitive neuroscience methods are used.
期刊最新文献
The role of the Somatosensory system in the feeling of emotions: a neurostimulation study Increased sensitivity to social hierarchy during social competition versus cooperation Exposure to Community Violence as a Mechanism Linking Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Neural Responses to Reward The SocialVidStim: a video database of positive and negative social evaluation stimuli for use in social cognitive neuroscience paradigms Disrupted cognitive and affective empathy network interactions in autistic children viewing social animation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1