Effect of quick simple exercise on non-specific low back pain in Japanese workers: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1265/ehpm.22-00203
Fuminari Asada, Takuo Nomura, Kenichiro Takano, Masashi Kubota, Motoki Iwasaki, Takayuki Oka, Ko Matsudaira
{"title":"Effect of quick simple exercise on non-specific low back pain in Japanese workers: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Fuminari Asada,&nbsp;Takuo Nomura,&nbsp;Kenichiro Takano,&nbsp;Masashi Kubota,&nbsp;Motoki Iwasaki,&nbsp;Takayuki Oka,&nbsp;Ko Matsudaira","doi":"10.1265/ehpm.22-00203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We designed a quick simple exercise program that can be performed in a short period of time in real-world occupational health settings and investigated the effects of three months of program implementation on non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 136 individuals working in the manufacturing industry. The quick simple exercise program was designed to be doable in three minutes and consisted of two exercises: a hamstring stretch and a lumbar spine rotation with forward, backward, and lateral flexion. This was a randomized controlled trial incorporating an intervention group to whom the exercises were recommended within a leaflet, and a control group to whom the exercises were not recommended. NSLBP was evaluated at baseline and after three months using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, ranging from 0 points (no pain at all) to 10 points (worst pain imaginable). The percentages of cases that improved by a minimal clinically important difference (two points or above) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 76.1% of the intervention group participants performed the quick simple exercises at least once every one or two days. Three months after baseline, a significantly higher percentage of participants in the intervention group (17 participants: 25%) had NSLBP improvement of two or more points on the NRS compared to that in the control group (8 participants, 12%) (P = 0.047). The average NRS score decreased significantly from 1.87 ± 1.86 to 1.33 ± 1.60 in the intervention group but showed no significant change in the control group, transitioning from 1.46 ± 1.73 to 1.52 ± 1.83. A significant interaction was also observed between the intervention and control groups (F = 6.550, P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three months of a quick simple exercise program among workers in the manufacturing industry increased the percentage of workers with improvement in the NRS scores. This suggests that the program is effective in managing NSLBP in workers in the manufacturing industry.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR UMIN000024117.</p>","PeriodicalId":11707,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10287985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.22-00203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We designed a quick simple exercise program that can be performed in a short period of time in real-world occupational health settings and investigated the effects of three months of program implementation on non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

Methods: Participants were 136 individuals working in the manufacturing industry. The quick simple exercise program was designed to be doable in three minutes and consisted of two exercises: a hamstring stretch and a lumbar spine rotation with forward, backward, and lateral flexion. This was a randomized controlled trial incorporating an intervention group to whom the exercises were recommended within a leaflet, and a control group to whom the exercises were not recommended. NSLBP was evaluated at baseline and after three months using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, ranging from 0 points (no pain at all) to 10 points (worst pain imaginable). The percentages of cases that improved by a minimal clinically important difference (two points or above) were compared.

Results: Overall, 76.1% of the intervention group participants performed the quick simple exercises at least once every one or two days. Three months after baseline, a significantly higher percentage of participants in the intervention group (17 participants: 25%) had NSLBP improvement of two or more points on the NRS compared to that in the control group (8 participants, 12%) (P = 0.047). The average NRS score decreased significantly from 1.87 ± 1.86 to 1.33 ± 1.60 in the intervention group but showed no significant change in the control group, transitioning from 1.46 ± 1.73 to 1.52 ± 1.83. A significant interaction was also observed between the intervention and control groups (F = 6.550, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: Three months of a quick simple exercise program among workers in the manufacturing industry increased the percentage of workers with improvement in the NRS scores. This suggests that the program is effective in managing NSLBP in workers in the manufacturing industry.

Trial registration: UMIN-CTR UMIN000024117.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速简单运动对日本工人非特异性腰痛的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:我们设计了一个可以在现实职业健康环境中短时间内进行的快速简单的锻炼计划,并调查了三个月的计划实施对非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)的影响。方法:参与者为136名在制造业工作的个人。这个快速简单的运动项目被设计成在三分钟内完成,包括两个练习:拉伸腿筋和腰椎旋转,向前、向后和侧向弯曲。这是一项随机对照试验,其中包括一组干预组,他们在传单中推荐锻炼,另一组对照组不推荐锻炼。在基线和三个月后使用数值评定量表(NRS)评分对NSLBP进行评估,评分范围从0分(完全没有疼痛)到10分(可想象的最严重疼痛)。通过最小临床重要差异(2分或以上)改善的病例百分比进行比较。结果:总体而言,76.1%的干预组参与者至少每一天或两天进行一次快速简单练习。基线后3个月,干预组(17名参与者:25%)的NSLBP在NRS上改善2分或以上的比例明显高于对照组(8名参与者,12%)(P = 0.047)。干预组NRS平均评分由1.87±1.86下降至1.33±1.60,对照组无明显变化,由1.46±1.73下降至1.52±1.83。干预组与对照组之间也存在显著的交互作用(F = 6.550, P = 0.012)。结论:在制造业工人中进行三个月的快速简单锻炼计划增加了NRS得分改善的工人的百分比。这表明该计划在管理制造业工人的非slbp方面是有效的。试验注册号:UMIN-CTR UMIN000024117。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese Society for Hygiene, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (EHPM) brings a comprehensive approach to prevention and environmental health related to medical, biological, molecular biological, genetic, physical, psychosocial, chemical, and other environmental factors. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine features definitive studies on human health sciences and provides comprehensive and unique information to a worldwide readership.
期刊最新文献
Association between urinary metallothionein concentration and causes of death among cadmium-exposed residents in Japan: a 35-year follow-up study. Application of machine learning algorithms in predicting new onset hypertension: a study based on the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among students under school supervision in Japan: a descriptive epidemiological study (2008-2021). Impact of fear of coronavirus disease 2019 on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits associated with depressive symptoms, functional impairment, and low self-esteem in university students: a cross-sectional study with mediation analysis. Regional adipose distribution and metabolically unhealthy phenotype in Chinese adults: evidence from China National Health Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1