Value of Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Success of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.97658
Osman Kupik, Murat Tuncel, Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Kadri Altundağ, Figen Başaran Demirkazık, Belkıs Erbaş
{"title":"Value of Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Success of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Osman Kupik,&nbsp;Murat Tuncel,&nbsp;Pınar Özgen Kıratlı,&nbsp;Meltem Gülsün Akpınar,&nbsp;Kadri Altundağ,&nbsp;Figen Başaran Demirkazık,&nbsp;Belkıs Erbaş","doi":"10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.97658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective study was planned to compare the predictive value of dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty seven patients with LABC [median age: 47, (26-66)] underwent a dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET study at baseline, and after 2-3 cycles of (NAC) were included (interim). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) values and SUV ratios for the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 5<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup>, and 30<sup>th</sup> minutes and dynamic curve slope (SL) values and SL ratios were measured using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG dynamic data. In addition, the values of SUV<sub>mean</sub> (2minSUVmean), SULpeak (2minSULpeak), metabolic volume (2minVol), and total lesion glycolysis (2minTLG) were measured for the first 2 min. Percent changes between baseline and interim studies were calculated and compared with the pathological results as the pathological complete response (PCR) or the pathological non-complete response (non-PCR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to calculate the area under the curve to predict PCR. Optimal threshold values were calculated to discriminate between PCR and non-PCR groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline study SUV 30 (p=0.044), SUV 30/2 (p=0.041), SUV 30/5 (p=0.049), SUV 30/10 (p=0.021), SL 30/2 (p=0.029) and SL 30/5 (p=0.027) values were statistically significant different between PCR and non-PCR groups. The percentage changes of 2minVol between PCR and non-PCR groups were statistically significant. For the threshold value of -67.6% change in 2minVol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.2%, 77.8%, 63.6%, 93.3%, and 80.7%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.826, p=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Semiquantitative parameters for dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET can predict PCR. % changes in 2minVol can identify non-responding patients better than other parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":44681,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/61/MIRT-32-94.PMC10284189.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.97658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This prospective study was planned to compare the predictive value of dynamic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods: Twenty seven patients with LABC [median age: 47, (26-66)] underwent a dynamic 18F-FDG PET study at baseline, and after 2-3 cycles of (NAC) were included (interim). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values and SUV ratios for the 2nd, 5th, 10th, and 30th minutes and dynamic curve slope (SL) values and SL ratios were measured using 18F-FDG dynamic data. In addition, the values of SUVmean (2minSUVmean), SULpeak (2minSULpeak), metabolic volume (2minVol), and total lesion glycolysis (2minTLG) were measured for the first 2 min. Percent changes between baseline and interim studies were calculated and compared with the pathological results as the pathological complete response (PCR) or the pathological non-complete response (non-PCR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to calculate the area under the curve to predict PCR. Optimal threshold values were calculated to discriminate between PCR and non-PCR groups.

Results: Baseline study SUV 30 (p=0.044), SUV 30/2 (p=0.041), SUV 30/5 (p=0.049), SUV 30/10 (p=0.021), SL 30/2 (p=0.029) and SL 30/5 (p=0.027) values were statistically significant different between PCR and non-PCR groups. The percentage changes of 2minVol between PCR and non-PCR groups were statistically significant. For the threshold value of -67.6% change in 2minVol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.2%, 77.8%, 63.6%, 93.3%, and 80.7%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.826, p=0.009).

Conclusion: Semiquantitative parameters for dynamic 18F-FDG PET can predict PCR. % changes in 2minVol can identify non-responding patients better than other parameters.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态18F-FDG PET/CT预测局部晚期癌症患者新辅助化疗成功率的价值:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:本前瞻性研究旨在比较动态18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)对接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的局部晚期癌症患者(LABC)的预测价值,并且在2-3个周期(NAC)之后被包括在内(临时)。使用18F-FDG动态数据测量第2、5、10和30分钟的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)值和SUV比率以及动态曲线斜率(SL)值和SL比率。此外,在前2分钟测量SUVmean(2minSUVmeans)、SULpeak(2minSULpeak)、代谢量(2minVol)和总损伤糖酵解(2minTLG)的值。计算基线研究和中期研究之间的百分比变化,并将其与病理学结果进行比较,作为病理学完全反应(PCR)或病理学非完全反应(non-PCR)。获得受试者工作特性曲线,以计算曲线下的面积来预测PCR。计算最佳阈值以区分PCR组和非PCR组。结果:基线研究SUV 30(p=0.044)、SUV 30/2(p=0.041)、SUV 3/5(p=0.049)、SUV 30/10(p=0.021)、SL 30/2(p=0.029)和SL 30/5(p=0.027)值在PCR组和非PCR组之间具有统计学显著差异。2minVol在PCR组和非PCR组之间的百分比变化具有统计学意义。对于2minVol变化为-67.6%的阈值,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为87.2%、77.8%、63.6%、93.3%和80.7%(曲线下面积:0.826,p=0.009)2minVol的变化比其他参数更能识别无反应的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy (Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther, MIRT) is publishes original research articles, invited reviews, editorials, short communications, letters, consensus statements, guidelines and case reports with a literature review on the topic, in the field of molecular imaging, multimodality imaging, nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, radiopharmacy, medical physics, dosimetry and radiobiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Y-90 Radioembolization Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cases Using MRI Radiomics. Cooccurrence of Capsular Liver Lesions Along with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Hematogenous Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Patients on Consecutive 18F-FDG PET/CT Studies. Impacts of 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters on Differential Diagnosis and Outcome of Patients with Primary Invasive Mucinous and Lepidic Predominant Adenocarcinoma of the Lung. Prognostic Importance of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography in Uterine Cervical Cancer Deep-learning-based Attenuation Correction for 68Ga-DOTATATE Whole-body PET Imaging: A Dual-center Clinical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1