Comparison of Radioactive Iodine Activities in Terms of Short- and Long-term Results in Ablation Therapy in Patients with Low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

IF 1.1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.05826
Seray Saraçoğlu, Osman Güven, Gündüzalp Buğrahan Babacan, Savaş Karyağar, Tamer Özülker, Sadık Ergür, Sevda Sağlampınar Karyağar
{"title":"Comparison of Radioactive Iodine Activities in Terms of Short- and Long-term Results in Ablation Therapy in Patients with Low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.","authors":"Seray Saraçoğlu, Osman Güven, Gündüzalp Buğrahan Babacan, Savaş Karyağar, Tamer Özülker, Sadık Ergür, Sevda Sağlampınar Karyağar","doi":"10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.05826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment responses after ablation with 30-50 mCi radioactive iodine (RAI) and 100 mCi RAI in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who were in the low-risk group according to 2015 American Thyroid Associations Classification (ATA 2015) criteria. Methods: Between February 2016 and August 2018, 100 patients who received RAI treatment in our clinic after total thyroidectomy and who were in the low-risk group DTC were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: low-activity (30-50 mCi) (group 1) and high-activity (100 mCi) (group 2). While 54 patients were treated with low activity, 46 patients received high activity RAI. The 2 groups were compared according to the 1st- and 3rd-year treatment response status. Results: According to the first-year follow-up, 15 patients were accepted as indeterminate response and 85 patients as excellent response. Three (5.5%) of the patients who were accepted as indeterminate response were in group 1 and 12 (26%) were in group 2. According to the third year follow-up, 1 patient in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 were accepted as indeterminate response. No biochemical incomplete response or recurrent disease was detected. In the chi-square analysis performed to investigate the relationship between the first-year treatment response and RAI activities, a significant relationship was found (p=0.004). In the Mann-Whitney U test performed to investigate the parameters that may be effective in the treatment response, only the preablative serum thyroglobulin value was shown to have a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.01). In the long-term follow-up of the patients, based on the third year treatment response data, chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate the two groups in terms of treatment responses, and no statistically significant relationship was found (p=0.73). Conclusion: Ablation with 30-50 mCi can be safely applied in DTC patients who are in the ATA 2015 low-risk group and are planned for RAI ablation treatment.","PeriodicalId":44681,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","volume":"32 2","pages":"112-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/47/MIRT-32-112.PMC10284181.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.05826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment responses after ablation with 30-50 mCi radioactive iodine (RAI) and 100 mCi RAI in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who were in the low-risk group according to 2015 American Thyroid Associations Classification (ATA 2015) criteria. Methods: Between February 2016 and August 2018, 100 patients who received RAI treatment in our clinic after total thyroidectomy and who were in the low-risk group DTC were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: low-activity (30-50 mCi) (group 1) and high-activity (100 mCi) (group 2). While 54 patients were treated with low activity, 46 patients received high activity RAI. The 2 groups were compared according to the 1st- and 3rd-year treatment response status. Results: According to the first-year follow-up, 15 patients were accepted as indeterminate response and 85 patients as excellent response. Three (5.5%) of the patients who were accepted as indeterminate response were in group 1 and 12 (26%) were in group 2. According to the third year follow-up, 1 patient in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 were accepted as indeterminate response. No biochemical incomplete response or recurrent disease was detected. In the chi-square analysis performed to investigate the relationship between the first-year treatment response and RAI activities, a significant relationship was found (p=0.004). In the Mann-Whitney U test performed to investigate the parameters that may be effective in the treatment response, only the preablative serum thyroglobulin value was shown to have a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.01). In the long-term follow-up of the patients, based on the third year treatment response data, chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate the two groups in terms of treatment responses, and no statistically significant relationship was found (p=0.73). Conclusion: Ablation with 30-50 mCi can be safely applied in DTC patients who are in the ATA 2015 low-risk group and are planned for RAI ablation treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低危分化型甲状腺癌消融治疗中放射性碘活性的短期和长期效果比较
目的:比较2015年美国甲状腺协会分类(ATA 2015)低危组分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者应用30-50 mCi放射性碘(RAI)和100 mCi放射性碘(RAI)消融后的治疗反应。方法:选取2016年2月至2018年8月在我院接受甲状腺全切除术后RAI治疗的低危组DTC患者100例进行回顾性研究。这些患者被分为2组:低活性(30-50 mCi)(1组)和高活性(100 mCi)(2组)。54例患者接受低活性治疗,46例患者接受高活性RAI治疗。比较两组患者1年、3年治疗反应情况。结果:经1年随访,15例为不确定缓解,85例为优缓解。1组有3例(5.5%)被认为反应不确定,2组有12例(26%)。经3年随访,1组1例,2组3例为反应不确定。未发现生化反应不完全或疾病复发。在卡方分析中,研究第一年治疗反应与RAI活性之间的关系,发现显著相关(p=0.004)。在研究可能对治疗反应有效的参数的Mann-Whitney U检验中,两组之间只有消融前血清甲状腺球蛋白值有显著差异(p=0.01)。在对患者的长期随访中,以第3年治疗反应数据为基础,采用卡方分析对两组治疗反应进行评价,无统计学意义(p=0.73)。结论:在ATA 2015低危组中计划进行RAI消融治疗的DTC患者中,30-50 mCi消融可以安全应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy (Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther, MIRT) is publishes original research articles, invited reviews, editorials, short communications, letters, consensus statements, guidelines and case reports with a literature review on the topic, in the field of molecular imaging, multimodality imaging, nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, radiopharmacy, medical physics, dosimetry and radiobiology.
期刊最新文献
Aortic Calcifications Mimicking Lymph Nodes on 18F-PSMA1007 PET. The Complementary Roles of 18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in an Evaluation of A Patient With Parathyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Truncation Artifact Presenting as Cropped Projections and Wedge Defect in Sinogram During Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Isolated Unilateral Ovarian Metastasis from Breast Cancer Demonstrated by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Unusual Soft Tissue and Muscle Metastases in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Insights from 131I Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1