Pandemic-Induced Telework Challenges and Strategies.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1
Tomika W Greer, Stephanie C Payne, Rebecca J Thompson
{"title":"Pandemic-Induced Telework Challenges and Strategies.","authors":"Tomika W Greer,&nbsp;Stephanie C Payne,&nbsp;Rebecca J Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telework was an established discretionary practice with a considerable amount of research. However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced people who had never worked from home before to do so. Our two-wave descriptive investigation provides a historical snapshot of what approximately 400 teleworkers experienced in the first two to three months of the pandemic. We explored how this experience differed for those who had previously teleworked, those who had children in their home, and those who had supervisory responsibilities. The data exposed telework challenges and pandemic-specific challenges. The results support job crafting theories that teleworkers proactively implement strategies to adjust their boundaries and relationships to meet their need (Biron et al., <i>Personnel Review</i>, 2022). The data also revealed that employees were still struggling two months later, despite implementing strategies like self-care, taking breaks, and psychological reframing. This research provides detailed evidence of how pandemic-induced telework is not the same as traditional telework and some initial evidence of the pandemic-induced telework adjustment time period.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telework was an established discretionary practice with a considerable amount of research. However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced people who had never worked from home before to do so. Our two-wave descriptive investigation provides a historical snapshot of what approximately 400 teleworkers experienced in the first two to three months of the pandemic. We explored how this experience differed for those who had previously teleworked, those who had children in their home, and those who had supervisory responsibilities. The data exposed telework challenges and pandemic-specific challenges. The results support job crafting theories that teleworkers proactively implement strategies to adjust their boundaries and relationships to meet their need (Biron et al., Personnel Review, 2022). The data also revealed that employees were still struggling two months later, despite implementing strategies like self-care, taking breaks, and psychological reframing. This research provides detailed evidence of how pandemic-induced telework is not the same as traditional telework and some initial evidence of the pandemic-induced telework adjustment time period.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病引发的远程工作挑战和策略。
在新冠肺炎大流行之前,远程工作是一种既定的自由裁量做法,有大量的研究。然而,新冠肺炎大流行迫使以前从未在家工作过的人这样做。我们的两波描述性调查提供了大约400名远程工作者在大流行前两到三个月经历的历史快照。我们探讨了这种经历与那些以前做过远程工作的人、那些家里有孩子的人和那些负有监督责任的人有何不同。这些数据暴露了远程工作的挑战和特定于疫情的挑战。研究结果支持了远程工作者主动实施策略以调整他们的边界和关系以满足他们的需求的工作制定理论(Biron等人,《人事评论》,2022)。数据还显示,尽管实施了自我护理、休息和心理重建等策略,但两个月后,员工仍在挣扎。这项研究提供了详细的证据,证明了疫情导致的远程工作与传统的远程工作不同,并提供了疫情导致远程工作调整时间段的一些初步证据。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s41542-023-00151-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Workplace Substance Use Programs, Policies, and Practices on Current Substance Use Among A National Sample of Low-Income Workers: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Education Level An Evaluation of Indoor Sex Workers’ Psychosocial Occupational Health and Safety in Metro Vancouver, Canada Office Openess Affects Stress Regulation and Teamwork: A Neurophysiological Field Study Identifying Different Patterns of Citizenship Motives: A Latent Profile Analysis Methodological and Demographic Variation in Estimates of Economic Dependence Across Two Types of Gig Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1