Platelets and the Lectin Pathway of Complement Activation in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Signe Risbøl Vils, Anne Troldborg, Anne-Mette Hvas, Steffen Thiel
{"title":"Platelets and the Lectin Pathway of Complement Activation in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Antiphospholipid Syndrome.","authors":"Signe Risbøl Vils,&nbsp;Anne Troldborg,&nbsp;Anne-Mette Hvas,&nbsp;Steffen Thiel","doi":"10.1055/a-2087-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of thrombosis even when they do not have antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Interactions between complement activation and activated platelets have been suggested in SLE and APS and could play a role in the increased thrombosis risk. <b>Objectives</b>  To explore factors potentially related to the prothrombotic pathophysiology in patients with SLE, primary APS, and healthy controls, by investigating lectin pathway proteins (LPPs), complement activation, platelet aggregation, and platelet activation. <b>Methods</b>  This cross-sectional cohort study included 20 SLE patients, 17 primary APS, and 39 healthy controls. Flow cytometry and light transmission aggregometry were used to assess platelet activation and aggregation. Using time-resolved immunofluorometric assays, the plasma concentrations of 11 LPPs and C3dg, reflecting complement activation, were measured. <b>Results</b>  H-ficolin plasma concentrations were higher in SLE and APS patients than in controls ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01 and <i>p</i>  = 0.03). M-ficolin was lower in SLE than in APS ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01) and controls ( <i>p</i>  = 0.03). MAp19 was higher in APS patients than in SLE patients ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01) and controls ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). In APS patients, MASP-2 and C3dg correlated negatively with platelet activation. Platelet-bound fibrinogen after agonist stimulation and C3dg concentrations correlated negatively with platelet activation. <b>Conclusion</b>  We observed significant differences between SLE and APS patients regarding complement proteins and platelet activation. Particularly the negative correlations between MASP-2 and C3dg with platelet activation only observed in APS patients suggest that interactions between complement activation and platelets differ in SLE and APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/61/10-1055-a-2087-0314.PMC10270747.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2087-0314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of thrombosis even when they do not have antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Interactions between complement activation and activated platelets have been suggested in SLE and APS and could play a role in the increased thrombosis risk. Objectives  To explore factors potentially related to the prothrombotic pathophysiology in patients with SLE, primary APS, and healthy controls, by investigating lectin pathway proteins (LPPs), complement activation, platelet aggregation, and platelet activation. Methods  This cross-sectional cohort study included 20 SLE patients, 17 primary APS, and 39 healthy controls. Flow cytometry and light transmission aggregometry were used to assess platelet activation and aggregation. Using time-resolved immunofluorometric assays, the plasma concentrations of 11 LPPs and C3dg, reflecting complement activation, were measured. Results  H-ficolin plasma concentrations were higher in SLE and APS patients than in controls ( p  = 0.01 and p  = 0.03). M-ficolin was lower in SLE than in APS ( p  = 0.01) and controls ( p  = 0.03). MAp19 was higher in APS patients than in SLE patients ( p  = 0.01) and controls ( p  < 0.001). In APS patients, MASP-2 and C3dg correlated negatively with platelet activation. Platelet-bound fibrinogen after agonist stimulation and C3dg concentrations correlated negatively with platelet activation. Conclusion  We observed significant differences between SLE and APS patients regarding complement proteins and platelet activation. Particularly the negative correlations between MASP-2 and C3dg with platelet activation only observed in APS patients suggest that interactions between complement activation and platelets differ in SLE and APS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性红斑狼疮或抗磷脂综合征患者的血小板和补体激活凝集素途径。
背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者即使没有抗磷脂综合征(APS),血栓形成的风险也会增加。在SLE和APS中,补体活化和活化血小板之间存在相互作用,并可能在血栓形成风险增加中发挥作用。目的通过研究凝集素途径蛋白(LPPs)、补体活化、血小板聚集和血小板活化,探讨SLE患者、原发性APS患者和健康对照者血栓形成前病理生理的潜在相关因素。方法本横断面队列研究包括20例SLE患者、17例原发性APS患者和39例健康对照。采用流式细胞术和光透射聚集法观察血小板活化和聚集情况。采用时间分辨免疫荧光测定法,测定反映补体活化的11种LPPs和C3dg的血浆浓度。结果SLE和APS患者H-ficolin血药浓度高于对照组(p = 0.01和p = 0.03)。SLE患者M-ficolin水平低于APS患者(p = 0.01)和对照组(p = 0.03)。APS患者的MAp19水平高于SLE患者(p = 0.01)和对照组(p)。结论SLE与APS患者在补体蛋白和血小板活化方面存在显著差异。特别是,仅在APS患者中观察到的MASP-2和C3dg与血小板活化之间的负相关表明,补体活化和血小板之间的相互作用在SLE和APS中有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Urgent Bleeding in Patients with Hemophilia A: Focus on the Use of Emicizumab Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs TH Open Continues to Highlight the State-of-the-Art on Thrombosis and Hemostasis with a Renewed Editorial Board The Effect of Rituximab on Antiphospholipid Titers in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1