Evaluation of frequentist test statistics using constrained statistical inference in the context of the generalized linear model.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2023.2222164
Caroline Keck, Axel Mayer, Yves Rosseel
{"title":"Evaluation of frequentist test statistics using constrained statistical inference in the context of the generalized linear model.","authors":"Caroline Keck,&nbsp;Axel Mayer,&nbsp;Yves Rosseel","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2222164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When faced with a binary or count outcome, informative hypotheses can be tested in the generalized linear model using the distance statistic as well as modified versions of the Wald, the Score and the likelihood-ratio test (LRT). In contrast to classical null hypothesis testing, informative hypotheses allow to directly examine the direction or the order of the regression coefficients. Since knowledge about the practical performance of informative test statistics is missing in the theoretically oriented literature, we aim at closing this gap using simulation studies in the context of logistic and Poisson regression. We examine the effect of the number of constraints as well as the sample size on type I error rates when the hypothesis of interest can be expressed as a linear function of the regression parameters. The LRT shows the best performance in general, followed by the Score test. Furthermore, both the sample size and especially the number of constraints impact the type I error rates considerably more in logistic compared to Poisson regression. We provide an empirical data example together with R code that can be easily adapted by applied researchers. Moreover, we discuss informative hypothesis testing about effects of interest, which are a non-linear function of the regression parameters. We demonstrate this by means of a second empirical data example.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/26/RHPB_11_2222164.PMC10288922.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2222164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When faced with a binary or count outcome, informative hypotheses can be tested in the generalized linear model using the distance statistic as well as modified versions of the Wald, the Score and the likelihood-ratio test (LRT). In contrast to classical null hypothesis testing, informative hypotheses allow to directly examine the direction or the order of the regression coefficients. Since knowledge about the practical performance of informative test statistics is missing in the theoretically oriented literature, we aim at closing this gap using simulation studies in the context of logistic and Poisson regression. We examine the effect of the number of constraints as well as the sample size on type I error rates when the hypothesis of interest can be expressed as a linear function of the regression parameters. The LRT shows the best performance in general, followed by the Score test. Furthermore, both the sample size and especially the number of constraints impact the type I error rates considerably more in logistic compared to Poisson regression. We provide an empirical data example together with R code that can be easily adapted by applied researchers. Moreover, we discuss informative hypothesis testing about effects of interest, which are a non-linear function of the regression parameters. We demonstrate this by means of a second empirical data example.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广义线性模型下使用约束统计推断的频率检验统计量的评估。
当面对二进制或计数结果时,信息假设可以在广义线性模型中使用距离统计量以及修改版本的Wald, Score和似然比检验(LRT)进行检验。与经典的零假设检验相反,信息性假设允许直接检查回归系数的方向或顺序。由于在理论导向的文献中缺少关于信息检验统计的实际性能的知识,我们的目标是在逻辑和泊松回归的背景下使用模拟研究来缩小这一差距。当感兴趣的假设可以表示为回归参数的线性函数时,我们检查约束数量以及样本量对I型错误率的影响。LRT总体上表现最好,其次是Score测试。此外,与泊松回归相比,在逻辑分析中,样本量,特别是约束条件的数量对I型错误率的影响要大得多。我们提供了一个经验数据示例以及R代码,可以很容易地被应用研究人员使用。此外,我们还讨论了关于兴趣效应的信息假设检验,这是回归参数的非线性函数。我们通过第二个经验数据例子来证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive emotional regulation in physiotherapy students in Croatia. Look, over there! A streaker! - Qualitative study examining streaking as a behaviour change technique for habit formation in recreational runners. Factors influencing health-related quality of life of children with overweight and obesity in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Navigating post-ICU care: understanding family members' experiences - a qualitative study. Supporting General Practitioners and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: the contribution of Collective Intelligence to the development of the 'Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia' (MIAMI) intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1