Measuring Intellectual Curiosity across Cultures: Validity and Comparability of a New Scale in Six Languages.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/00223891.2023.2199863
Matthias Bluemke, Lukas Engel, David J Grüning, Clemens M Lechner
{"title":"Measuring Intellectual Curiosity across Cultures: Validity and Comparability of a New Scale in Six Languages.","authors":"Matthias Bluemke, Lukas Engel, David J Grüning, Clemens M Lechner","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2023.2199863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intellectual curiosity-the tendency to seek out and engage in opportunities for effortful cognitive activity-is a crucial construct in educational research and beyond. Measures of intellectual curiosity vary widely in psychometric quality, and few measures have demonstrated validity and comparability of scores across multiple languages. We analyzed a novel, six-item intellectual curiosity scale (ICS) originally developed for cross-national comparisons in the context of the OECD's Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Samples from six countries representing six national languages (U.S. Germany, France, Spain, Poland, and Japan; total <i>N</i> = 5,557) confirmed that the ICS possesses very good psychometric properties. The scale is essentially unidimensional and showed excellent reliability estimates. On top of factorial validity, the scale demonstrated strict measurement invariance across demographic segments (gender, age groups, and educational strata) and at least partial scalar invariance across countries. As per its convergent and divergent associations with a broad range of constructs (e.g., Open-Mindedness and other Big Five traits, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Job Orientations, and Vocational Interests), it also showed convincing construct validity. Given its internal and external relationships, we recommend the ICS for assessing intellectual curiosity, especially in cross-cultural research applications, yet we also point out future research areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"156-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2199863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intellectual curiosity-the tendency to seek out and engage in opportunities for effortful cognitive activity-is a crucial construct in educational research and beyond. Measures of intellectual curiosity vary widely in psychometric quality, and few measures have demonstrated validity and comparability of scores across multiple languages. We analyzed a novel, six-item intellectual curiosity scale (ICS) originally developed for cross-national comparisons in the context of the OECD's Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Samples from six countries representing six national languages (U.S. Germany, France, Spain, Poland, and Japan; total N = 5,557) confirmed that the ICS possesses very good psychometric properties. The scale is essentially unidimensional and showed excellent reliability estimates. On top of factorial validity, the scale demonstrated strict measurement invariance across demographic segments (gender, age groups, and educational strata) and at least partial scalar invariance across countries. As per its convergent and divergent associations with a broad range of constructs (e.g., Open-Mindedness and other Big Five traits, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Job Orientations, and Vocational Interests), it also showed convincing construct validity. Given its internal and external relationships, we recommend the ICS for assessing intellectual curiosity, especially in cross-cultural research applications, yet we also point out future research areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量跨文化的求知欲:新量表在六种语言中的有效性和可比性。
求知欲--寻找并参与努力认知活动机会的倾向--是教育研究及其他领域的一个重要概念。对求知欲的测量在心理测量质量方面存在很大差异,很少有测量能证明其有效性和多语言分数的可比性。我们分析了一种新颖的、包含六个项目的求知欲量表(ICS),该量表最初是在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的成人能力国际评估项目(PIAAC)中为进行跨国比较而开发的。来自六个国家、代表六种民族语言的样本(美国、德国、法国、西班牙、波兰和日本;总人数 = 5,557)证实,ICS 具有非常好的心理测量特性。该量表基本上是单维度的,并显示出极佳的可靠性。除了因子效度之外,该量表在不同的人口统计群体(性别、年龄组和教育阶层)之间表现出严格的测量不变性,在不同国家之间至少表现出部分标度不变性。该量表与一系列广泛的构念(如开放心态和其他大五特质、毅力、感觉寻求、工作取向和职业兴趣)之间的收敛和发散关联也显示出令人信服的构念效度。鉴于其内部和外部关系,我们推荐用 ICS 来评估求知欲,尤其是在跨文化研究应用中,同时我们也指出了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
期刊最新文献
Patience and Patience Regulation: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Complementary Scales with Alternate Forms. Developing an Italian Adaptation of the Interpersonal Sensitivities Circumplex (ISC-IT) Using Ant Colony Optimization. A Latent Structural Comparison Between the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Problems (CSIP) and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C). Assessing Vulnerable and Antagonistic Traits Using the Five-Factor Model Measures. Two-Dimensional Machiavellianism: Shortening the Scale and Expanding the Nomological Network to Political Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1