Effect of humeral rotation on the reliability of radiographic measurements for proximal humerus fractures

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.06.006
Aresh Sepehri , David J. Stockton , Darren M. Roffey , Kelly A. Lefaivre , Jeffrey M. Potter , Pierre Guy
{"title":"Effect of humeral rotation on the reliability of radiographic measurements for proximal humerus fractures","authors":"Aresh Sepehri ,&nbsp;David J. Stockton ,&nbsp;Darren M. Roffey ,&nbsp;Kelly A. Lefaivre ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Potter ,&nbsp;Pierre Guy","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are concerns as to the reliability of proximal humerus radiographic measurements, particularly regarding the rotational position of the humerus when obtaining radiographs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Twenty-four patients with proximal humerus fractures fixed surgically with locked plates received postoperative anteroposterior radiographs with the humerus in neutral rotation and in 30° of internal and external rotation. Radiographic measurements for head shaft angle, humeral offset and </span>humeral head height were performed in each humeral rotation position. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Mean differences (md) in measurements between humeral positions was evaluated using one-way ANOVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Head shaft angle demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability; the highest estimates for inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) were achieved in neutral rotation. There were significant differences in measurement values between each rotational position, with mean head shaft angle of 133.1° in external rotation, and increasingly valgus measurements in neutral (md: 7.6°; 95% CI: 5.0, 10.3°; p &lt; 0.001) and internal rotation (md: 26.4°; 95% CI: 21.8, 30.9°; p &lt; 0.001). Humeral head height and humeral offset showed good-to-excellent reliability in neutral and external rotation, but poor inter-rater reliability in internal rotation. Humeral head height was significantly greater using internal compared to external rotation (md: 4.5 mm; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.3 mm; p = 0.002). Humeral offset was significantly greater in external compared to internal rotation (md: 4.6 mm; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6 mm; p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Views of the humerus in neutral rotation and 30° of external rotation displayed superior reliability. Differences in radiographic measurement values, depending on humeral rotation views, can make for problematic correlations with patient outcome measures. Studies assessing radiographic outcomes following proximal humerus fractures should ensure standardized humeral rotation for obtaining anteroposterior shoulder radiographs, with neutral rotation and external rotation views likely yielding the most reliable results.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823001793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are concerns as to the reliability of proximal humerus radiographic measurements, particularly regarding the rotational position of the humerus when obtaining radiographs.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with proximal humerus fractures fixed surgically with locked plates received postoperative anteroposterior radiographs with the humerus in neutral rotation and in 30° of internal and external rotation. Radiographic measurements for head shaft angle, humeral offset and humeral head height were performed in each humeral rotation position. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Mean differences (md) in measurements between humeral positions was evaluated using one-way ANOVA.

Results

Head shaft angle demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability; the highest estimates for inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) were achieved in neutral rotation. There were significant differences in measurement values between each rotational position, with mean head shaft angle of 133.1° in external rotation, and increasingly valgus measurements in neutral (md: 7.6°; 95% CI: 5.0, 10.3°; p < 0.001) and internal rotation (md: 26.4°; 95% CI: 21.8, 30.9°; p < 0.001). Humeral head height and humeral offset showed good-to-excellent reliability in neutral and external rotation, but poor inter-rater reliability in internal rotation. Humeral head height was significantly greater using internal compared to external rotation (md: 4.5 mm; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.3 mm; p = 0.002). Humeral offset was significantly greater in external compared to internal rotation (md: 4.6 mm; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6 mm; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Views of the humerus in neutral rotation and 30° of external rotation displayed superior reliability. Differences in radiographic measurement values, depending on humeral rotation views, can make for problematic correlations with patient outcome measures. Studies assessing radiographic outcomes following proximal humerus fractures should ensure standardized humeral rotation for obtaining anteroposterior shoulder radiographs, with neutral rotation and external rotation views likely yielding the most reliable results.

Level of Evidence

Level IV

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肱骨旋转对肱骨近端骨折影像学测量可靠性的影响。
背景:肱骨近端X光片测量的可靠性令人担忧,尤其是拍摄X光片时肱骨的旋转位置:24名肱骨近端骨折患者接受了锁定钢板固定手术,术后在肱骨中性旋转和内外旋转30°的情况下接受了前胸X光片检查。在每个肱骨旋转位置对肱骨头轴角、肱骨偏移和肱骨头高度进行射线测量。采用类内相关系数评估评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。采用单因素方差分析评估不同肱骨位置测量值的平均差(md):头轴角度显示出良好至极佳的可靠性;中立旋转时的评分者间可靠性(ICC:0.85;95% CI:0.76,0.94)和评分者内部可靠性(ICC:0.96;95% CI:0.93,0.98)估计值最高。每个旋转位置的测量值之间存在明显差异,外旋时的平均头轴角为 133.1°,而中立位时的外翻测量值越来越大(md:7.6°;95% CI:5.0,10.3°;p 结论:外旋时的平均头轴角为 133.1°,而中立位时的外翻测量值越来越大(md:7.6°;95% CI:5.0,10.3°;p):肱骨在中立位旋转和外旋30°时的视图显示出卓越的可靠性。肱骨旋转角度不同,放射学测量值也不同,这可能导致与患者预后测量结果的相关性出现问题。对肱骨近端骨折后的放射学结果进行评估的研究应确保采用标准化的肱骨旋转视图来获取肩关节前方X光片,其中中性旋转和外旋视图可能会产生最可靠的结果:证据等级:IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Assessing subscapularis tears: Relationship between special tests and pain & tear severity. Analysis of orthopedic surgery-related incidents in operating rooms using a nationwide incident reporting database. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer versus open complete repair for symptomatic massive rotator cuff tear. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 and SF-36 instruments in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1