Culturally safe, appropriate, and high-quality breast cancer screening for transgender people: A scoping review.

IF 10.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Transgender Health Pub Date : 2023-01-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26895269.2022.2155289
Imogen Ramsey, Kate Kennedy, Greg Sharplin, Marion Eckert, Micah D J Peters
{"title":"Culturally safe, appropriate, and high-quality breast cancer screening for transgender people: A scoping review.","authors":"Imogen Ramsey, Kate Kennedy, Greg Sharplin, Marion Eckert, Micah D J Peters","doi":"10.1080/26895269.2022.2155289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a recognized need for evidence to inform breast cancer screening guidelines and services for transgender people, who face barriers to accessing appropriate and inclusive health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review summarized evidence for breast cancer risk and screening guidelines in transgender individuals, including the potential impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); factors that may influence screening decision-making and behaviors; and considerations for providing culturally safe, high-quality screening services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Searches were performed in Medline, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting information on the provision of culturally safe, high-quality breast cancer screening services for transgender people.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 57 sources for inclusion: 13 cross-sectional studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, 28 review or opinion articles, 6 systematic reviews, 1 qualitative study, and 1 book chapter. Evidence on rates of breast cancer screening among transgender people and the association between GAHT and breast cancer risk was inconclusive. Factors negatively associated with cancer screening behaviors included socioeconomic barriers, stigma, and lack of health provider awareness of transgender health issues. Breast cancer screening recommendations varied and were generally based on expert opinion due to the lack of clear evidence. Considerations for providing culturally safe care to transgender people were identified and mapped to the areas of workplace policies and procedures, patient information, clinic environment, professional conduct, communication, and knowledge and competency.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Screening recommendations for transgender individuals are complicated by the lack of robust epidemiological data and clear understanding of the role GAHT may play in breast cancer pathogenesis. Guidelines have been developed based on expert opinion and are subsequently not uniform or evidence based. Further work is required to clarify and consolidate recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgender Health","volume":"24 2","pages":"174-194"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2155289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a recognized need for evidence to inform breast cancer screening guidelines and services for transgender people, who face barriers to accessing appropriate and inclusive health care.

Aims: This review summarized evidence for breast cancer risk and screening guidelines in transgender individuals, including the potential impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); factors that may influence screening decision-making and behaviors; and considerations for providing culturally safe, high-quality screening services.

Methods: A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Searches were performed in Medline, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting information on the provision of culturally safe, high-quality breast cancer screening services for transgender people.

Results: We identified 57 sources for inclusion: 13 cross-sectional studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, 28 review or opinion articles, 6 systematic reviews, 1 qualitative study, and 1 book chapter. Evidence on rates of breast cancer screening among transgender people and the association between GAHT and breast cancer risk was inconclusive. Factors negatively associated with cancer screening behaviors included socioeconomic barriers, stigma, and lack of health provider awareness of transgender health issues. Breast cancer screening recommendations varied and were generally based on expert opinion due to the lack of clear evidence. Considerations for providing culturally safe care to transgender people were identified and mapped to the areas of workplace policies and procedures, patient information, clinic environment, professional conduct, communication, and knowledge and competency.

Discussion: Screening recommendations for transgender individuals are complicated by the lack of robust epidemiological data and clear understanding of the role GAHT may play in breast cancer pathogenesis. Guidelines have been developed based on expert opinion and are subsequently not uniform or evidence based. Further work is required to clarify and consolidate recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对变性人的文化上安全、适当和高质量的乳腺癌筛查:范围综述。
背景:目的:本综述总结了有关变性人乳腺癌风险和筛查指南的证据,包括性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)的潜在影响;可能影响筛查决策和行为的因素;以及提供文化安全、高质量筛查服务的注意事项:方法:根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围审查方法制定了一个方案。我们在 Medline、Emcare、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索了有关为变性人提供文化安全、高质量乳腺癌筛查服务的文章:我们确定了 57 个资料来源供纳入:13 项横断面研究、6 项病例报告、2 项系列病例、28 篇评论或观点文章、6 篇系统综述、1 项定性研究和 1 篇书籍章节。有关变性人乳腺癌筛查率以及变性人乳腺癌筛查与乳腺癌风险之间关系的证据尚无定论。与癌症筛查行为负相关的因素包括社会经济障碍、耻辱感以及医疗服务提供者对变性人健康问题缺乏认识。由于缺乏明确的证据,乳腺癌筛查建议各不相同,通常以专家意见为基础。为变性人提供文化安全护理的注意事项已被确定,并映射到工作场所政策和程序、患者信息、诊所环境、职业操守、沟通以及知识和能力等领域:由于缺乏可靠的流行病学数据,也不清楚 GAHT 在乳腺癌发病机制中可能扮演的角色,因此针对变性人的筛查建议非常复杂。指南是根据专家意见制定的,因此并不统一,也缺乏证据基础。需要进一步开展工作,以明确和巩固相关建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The gender congruences and life satisfaction scale for transgender and gender-diverse youth (GCLS-Y): a validation study with samples from the UK and US Parental perspectives on fertility preservation for their trans and gender-expansive children: Reflections on complexities of autonomy, support, and societal realities Knowledge and dispositions of caring professionals in school settings regarding trans, gender diverse and non-binary students: A scoping review of empirical research The impact of microaggressions on the mental health of trans and gender-diverse people: A scoping review “Your stress is mine too”: a qualitative exploration of couple-level minority stress in trans-inclusive couples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1