Athletes with mild post-COVID-19 symptoms experience increased respiratory and metabolic demands: Α cross-sectional study

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2022.10.004
Vasileios T. Stavrou , Astara Kyriaki , George D. Vavougios , Ioannis G. Fatouros , George S. Metsios , Konstantinos Kalabakas , Dimitrios Karagiannis , Zoe Daniil , Konstantinos I. Gourgoulianis , George Βasdekis
{"title":"Athletes with mild post-COVID-19 symptoms experience increased respiratory and metabolic demands: Α cross-sectional study","authors":"Vasileios T. Stavrou ,&nbsp;Astara Kyriaki ,&nbsp;George D. Vavougios ,&nbsp;Ioannis G. Fatouros ,&nbsp;George S. Metsios ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kalabakas ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Karagiannis ,&nbsp;Zoe Daniil ,&nbsp;Konstantinos I. Gourgoulianis ,&nbsp;George Βasdekis","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2022.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly affected different physiological systems, with a potentially profound effect on athletic performance. However, to date, such an effect has been neither addressed nor investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate fitness indicators, along with the respiratory and metabolic profile, in post-COVID-19 athletes. Forty male soccer players, were divided into two groups: non-hospitalized COVID-19 (<em>n</em> = 20, Age: [25.2 ± 4.1] years, Body Surface Area [BSA]: [1.9 ± 0.2] m<sup>2</sup>, body fat: 11.8% ± 3.4%) versus [vs] healthy (<em>n</em> = 20, Age: [25.1 ± 4.4] years, BSA: [2.0 ± 0.3] m<sup>2</sup>, body fat: 10.8% ± 4.5%). For each athlete, prior to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), body composition, spirometry, and lactate blood levels, were recorded. Differences between groups were assessed with the independent samples <em>t</em>-test (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Several differences were detected between the two groups: ventilation (<span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mi>E</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>: Resting: [14.7 ± 3.1] L·min<sup>−1</sup> vs. [11.5 ± 2.6] L·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.001; Maximal Effort: [137.1 ± 15.5] L·min<sup>−1</sup> vs. [109.1 ± 18.4] L·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), ratio V<sub>E</sub>/maximal voluntary ventilation (Resting: 7.9% ± 1.8% vs. 5.7% ± 1.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; Maximal Effort: 73.7% ± 10.8% vs. 63.1% ± 9.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.002), ratioV<sub>E</sub>/BSA (Resting: 7.9% ± 2.0% vs. 5.9% ± 1.4%, <em>p</em> = 0.001; Maximal Effort: 73.7% ± 11.1% vs. 66.2% ± 9.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.026), heart rate (Maximal Effort: [191.6 ± 7.8] bpm vs. [196.6 ± 8.6] bpm, <em>p</em> = 0.041), and lactate acid (Resting: [1.8 ± 0.8] mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> vs. [0.9 ± 0.1] mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; Maximal Effort: [11.0 ± 1.6] mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> vs. [9.8 ± 1.2] mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.009), during CPET. No significant differences were identified regarding maximal oxygen uptake ([55.7 ± 4.4] ml·min<sup>−1</sup>·kg<sup>−1</sup> vs. [55.4 ± 4.6] ml·min<sup>−1</sup>·kg<sup>−1</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.831). Our findings demonstrate a pattern of compromised respiratory function in post-COVID-19 athletes characterized by increased respiratory work at both rest and maximum effort as well as hyperventilation during exercise, which may explain the reported increased metabolic needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595388/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337622000634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly affected different physiological systems, with a potentially profound effect on athletic performance. However, to date, such an effect has been neither addressed nor investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate fitness indicators, along with the respiratory and metabolic profile, in post-COVID-19 athletes. Forty male soccer players, were divided into two groups: non-hospitalized COVID-19 (n = 20, Age: [25.2 ± 4.1] years, Body Surface Area [BSA]: [1.9 ± 0.2] m2, body fat: 11.8% ± 3.4%) versus [vs] healthy (n = 20, Age: [25.1 ± 4.4] years, BSA: [2.0 ± 0.3] m2, body fat: 10.8% ± 4.5%). For each athlete, prior to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), body composition, spirometry, and lactate blood levels, were recorded. Differences between groups were assessed with the independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). Several differences were detected between the two groups: ventilation (V˙E: Resting: [14.7 ± 3.1] L·min−1 vs. [11.5 ± 2.6] L·min−1, p = 0.001; Maximal Effort: [137.1 ± 15.5] L·min−1 vs. [109.1 ± 18.4] L·min−1, p < 0.001), ratio VE/maximal voluntary ventilation (Resting: 7.9% ± 1.8% vs. 5.7% ± 1.7%, p < 0.001; Maximal Effort: 73.7% ± 10.8% vs. 63.1% ± 9.0%, p = 0.002), ratioVE/BSA (Resting: 7.9% ± 2.0% vs. 5.9% ± 1.4%, p = 0.001; Maximal Effort: 73.7% ± 11.1% vs. 66.2% ± 9.2%, p = 0.026), heart rate (Maximal Effort: [191.6 ± 7.8] bpm vs. [196.6 ± 8.6] bpm, p = 0.041), and lactate acid (Resting: [1.8 ± 0.8] mmol·L-1 vs. [0.9 ± 0.1] mmol·L-1, p < 0.001; Maximal Effort: [11.0 ± 1.6] mmol·L-1 vs. [9.8 ± 1.2] mmol·L-1, p = 0.009), during CPET. No significant differences were identified regarding maximal oxygen uptake ([55.7 ± 4.4] ml·min−1·kg−1 vs. [55.4 ± 4.6] ml·min−1·kg−1, p = 0.831). Our findings demonstrate a pattern of compromised respiratory function in post-COVID-19 athletes characterized by increased respiratory work at both rest and maximum effort as well as hyperventilation during exercise, which may explain the reported increased metabolic needs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有轻度covid -19后症状的运动员呼吸和代谢需求增加:Α横断面研究
2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)显著影响了不同的生理系统,对运动成绩有潜在的深远影响。然而,迄今为止,这种影响既没有得到解决,也没有得到调查。因此,本研究的目的是调查COVID-19后运动员的体能指标以及呼吸和代谢状况。40名男性足球运动员被分为两组:未患病的新冠肺炎(n = 20岁,年龄:[25.2 ± 4.1]年,体表面积[BSA]:[1.9 ± 0.2]m2,体脂:11.8% ± 3.4%)与健康(n = 20岁,年龄:[25.1 ± 4.4]年,BSA:[2.0 ± 0.3]m2,体脂10.8% ± 4.5%)。在心肺运动测试(CPET)之前,记录每位运动员的身体成分、肺活量测定和乳酸血水平。各组之间的差异采用独立样本t检验进行评估(p <; 0.05)。两组之间存在一些差异:通气(V*E:静息:[14.7] ± 3.1]L·min−1与[11.5 ± 2.6]L·min−1,p = 0.001;最大作用力:[137.1 ± 15.5]L·min−1与[109.1 ± 18.4]L·min−1,p <; 0.001),比值VE/最大自主通气(静息:7.9% ± 1.8%对5.7% ± 1.7%,p <; 0.001;最大努力:73.7% ± 10.8%对63.1% ± 9.0%,p = 0.002),VE/BSA比率(静息:7.9% ± 2.0%对5.9% ± 1.4%,p = 0.001;最大努力:73.7% ± 11.1%对66.2% ± 9.2%,p = 0.026),心率(最大努力:[191.6 ± 7.8]bpm与[196.6 ± 8.6]bpm,p = 0.041)和乳酸(静息:[1.8 ± 0.8]毫摩尔·L-1与[0.9 ± 0.1]mmol·L-1,p <; 0.001;最大作用力:[11.0 ± 1.6]mmol·L-1与[9.8 ± 1.2]毫摩尔·L-1,p = 0.009)。在最大摄氧量方面没有发现显著差异([55.7 ± 4.4]ml·min−1·kg−1与[55.4 ± 4.6]ml·min−1·kg−1,p = 0.831)。我们的研究结果表明,COVID-19后运动员的呼吸功能受损模式的特征是在休息和最大努力时呼吸工作增加,以及在运动中过度换气,这可能解释了所报道的代谢需求增加的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular health in sedentary and athletes: Consensus, uncertainties, and ways for mitigation The effects of prolonged sitting behavior on resting-state brain functional connectivity in college students post-COVID-19 rehabilitation: A study based on fNIRS technology Effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system: A mendelian randomization study Exercise self-efficacy in older adults with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a latent profile analysis Failed Single-Leg Assessment of Postural Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1